Literature DB >> 2773795

Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults.

M J Roman1, R B Devereux, R Kramer-Fox, J O'Loughlin.   

Abstract

Two-dimensional echocardiography is increasingly used to measure aortic root dimensions, which provide prognostic information in aortic regurgitation and the Marfan syndrome. Aortic root dilatation is currently detected by nomograms based on M-mode echocardiographic data. Aortic root diameters measured by 2-dimensional echocardiography at the anulus, sinuses of Valsalva, supra-aortic ridge and proximal ascending aorta in 135 normal adults and 52 normal children were compared with age, gender, body habitus, blood pressure and stroke volume, and with M-mode findings and normal limits. Two-dimensional measurements at the sinuses of Valsalva were larger than M-mode aortic root values (p less than 0.001), and use of 2-dimensional values with M-mode nomograms falsely diagnosed aortic dilatation in 40% of normal children and 19% of normal adults. Two-dimensional measurements at the sinuses closely correlated with body surface area in children (r = 0.93, p less than 0.0005), moderately in adults younger than 40 years of age (r = 0.71, p less than 0.0005) and weakly in older adults (r = 0.40, p less than 0.0005). In adults, gender influenced aortic root size at all levels (p less than 0.001), but dimensions were similar when indexed for body surface area. Age strongly influenced supraaortic ridge and ascending aortic diameters; blood pressure and stroke volume had no independent effect on aortic size. In conclusion, (1) 2-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions are influenced by age and body size but not by blood pressure; (2) aortic root dilatation is overdiagnosed when aortic diameter at the sinuses of Valsalva is compared with M-mode nomograms; (3) nomograms comparing aortic diameter with body surface area should be used in children; and (4) although use of nomograms based on body size in adults should maximize sensitivity for aortic dilatation, 98% specificity is attained by use of an upper normal limit of 2.1 cm/m2 for aortic diameter at the sinuses of Valsalva in both men and women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2773795     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90430-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  187 in total

1.  Survival and complication free survival in Marfan's syndrome: implications of current guidelines.

Authors:  M Groenink; T A Lohuis; J G Tijssen; M S Naeff; R C Hennekam; E E van der Wall; B J Mulder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of cardiac output with exercise.

Authors:  Thomas Rowland; Philippe Obert
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Normal limits in relation to age, body size and gender of two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in persons ≥15 years of age.

Authors:  Richard B Devereux; Giovanni de Simone; Donna K Arnett; Lyle G Best; Eric Boerwinkle; Barbara V Howard; Dalane Kitzman; Elisa T Lee; Thomas H Mosley; Alan Weder; Mary J Roman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Marfan's syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel P Judge; Harry C Dietz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-03       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Multimodality imaging assessment of bicuspid aortic valve disease, thoracic aortic ectasia, and thoracic aortic aneurysmal disease.

Authors:  Preethi Mani; Reza Reyaldeen; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

Review 6.  A measured approach to managing the aortic root in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Ismail El-Hamamsy; Magdi H Yacoub
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Bicuspid valve-related aortic disease: flow assessment with conventional phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Nicholas S Burris; Michael D Hope
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Prevalence data on all Ghent features in a cross-sectional study of 87 adults with proven Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Svend Rand-Hendriksen; Rigmor Lundby; Lena Tjeldhorn; Kai Andersen; Jon Offstad; Svein Ove Semb; Hans-Jørgen Smith; Benedicte Paus; Odd Geiran
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Distribution, determinants, and normal reference values of thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters by computed tomography (from the Framingham Heart Study).

Authors:  Ian S Rogers; Joseph M Massaro; Quynh A Truong; Amir A Mahabadi; Matthias F Kriegel; Caroline S Fox; George Thanassoulis; Eric M Isselbacher; Udo Hoffmann; Christopher J O'Donnell
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 10.  Echocardiographic methods, quality review, and measurement accuracy in a randomized multicenter clinical trial of Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Elif Seda Selamet Tierney; Jami C Levine; Shan Chen; Timothy J Bradley; Gail D Pearson; Steven D Colan; Lynn A Sleeper; M Jay Campbell; Meryl S Cohen; Julie De Backer; Lin T Guey; Haleh Heydarian; Wyman W Lai; Mark B Lewin; Edward Marcus; Christopher R Mart; Ricardo H Pignatelli; Beth F Printz; Angela M Sharkey; Girish S Shirali; Shubhika Srivastava; Ronald V Lacro
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.