Literature DB >> 33392782

Effect of 940 nm laser diode irradiation prior to bonding procedure on postoperative sensitivity following class II composite restorations: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Loghman Rezaei-Soufi1, Mojgan Taheri2, Reza Fekrazadas3,4,5, Maryam Farhadian6.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of 940 nm laser diode on class II composite cavities prior to bonding and restoration process on the postoperative sensitivity (POS). Thirty patients with two bilateral premolars with mesio or disto-occlusal carious lesions were evaluated. In each patient, the teeth were randomly divided into the control and laser groups. After cavity preparation and isolation and before the bonding process, the laser group was subjected to 940 nm irradiation (Epic 10, Biolase, USA) by 400 μ tip continuously at 100 mW with 398 J/cm2 energy density of tip, which was applied for 5 s at a distance of 2 mm on the axial wall of the cavity. In the control group, irradiation was performed by using the aiming beam. Access cavity was then restored with a composite resin. Cold sensitivity was measured using a cold spray application on the middle third of teeth buccal surface at baseline (before the intervention), 1, 14, and 30 days after the restoration by visual analog scale (VAS) criteria. The mean Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for data analysis. It was shown that in both laser and control groups, the VAS was significantly decreased at all times compared to the baseline (p ≤ 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean VAS of two groups at baseline and first day (p ≤ 0.05), but at 14 and 30 days after the intervention, it was significantly lower in the laser group (p ≤ 0.05). The results of this study demonstrated that the cavity pretreatment with laser diode (940 nm) effectively reduces the postoperative sensitivity in class II composite restorations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Composite resins; Dental restoration; Laser; Operative dentistry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33392782     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-020-03213-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  7 in total

1.  Post-operative sensitivity in glass-ionomer versus adhesive resin-lined posterior composites.

Authors:  E S Akpata; W Sadiq
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.522

2.  Failure risk of posterior composites with post-operative sensitivity.

Authors:  M Hayashi; N H F Wilson
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.440

3.  Energy and Power Density: A Key Factor in Lasers Studies.

Authors:  Jacek Matys; Marzena Dominiak; Rafal Flieger
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-12-01

4.  Effect of bonding systems on post-operative sensitivity from posterior composites.

Authors:  Enosakhare S Akpata; Jawad Behbehani
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  Influence of multi-step etch-and-rinse versus self-etch adhesive systems on the post-operative sensitivity in medium-depth carious lesions: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Nicola Scotti; Emanuele Bergantin; Roberta Giovannini; Laura Delbosco; Lorenzo Breschi; Giuseppe Migliaretti; Damiano Pasqualini; Elio Berutti
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.522

6.  Effect of LED curing modes on postoperative sensitivity after Class II resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Qasem Alomari; Ridwaan Omar; Enosakhare Akpata
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Prevalence and distribution of cervical dentine hypersensitivity in a population in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  C Fischer; R G Fischer; A Wennberg
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.