Literature DB >> 14653280

Failure risk of posterior composites with post-operative sensitivity.

M Hayashi1, N H F Wilson.   

Abstract

Post-operative sensitivity (POS) may be observed in recently placed posterior composites. Evidence-based guidelines for the management of posterior composites with POS have yet to be determined. This study examined a retrospective analysis of the findings of a unique multi-center clinical trial to investigate the five-year risk of failure of posterior composites with POS and to determine the factors likely to have an important impact on the prognosis of the restorations. Longitudinal five-year data from the multi-center trial of Occlusin were analyzed. Data pertaining to a total of 1,101 restorations were included in the study. The failure rate at five years was calculated by means of three selected methods for all the restorations included in the study and for restorations with POS. Risk of failure for restorations with POS was analyzed by calculating an odds ratio along with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Logistic regression was carried out in order to identify those factors most likely to have had an important impact on the prognosis of restorations with POS. The analysis revealed that the restorations of Occlusin with POS were found to have been more likely to have failed at five years than the restorations of Occlusin without POS, with odds ratios ranging from 1.73 (95% CI: 1.04, 2.87) to 1.97 (95% CI: 1.36, 2.85). Distributions of patient age and cavity size were significantly different for successful and failed restorations (chi-square test, p < 0.05). Logistic regression indicated that cavity size was the only factor likely to have influenced the prognosis of the restorations with POS (p = 0.041, odds ratio 3.21, 95% CI 1.05: 9.70). Restorations with POS in large cavities were more likely to have failed by five years than restorations in small cavities. It was concluded that the restorations with Occlusin included in the Occlusin trial program were more likely to have failed at five years if POS occurred within one month of placement. Cavity size has been shown to have been an important factor in the prognosis of Occlusin trial restorations with POS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14653280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  9 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials.

Authors:  R Hickel; J-F Roulet; S Bayne; S D Heintze; I A Mjör; M Peters; V Rousson; R Randall; G Schmalz; M Tyas; G Vanherle
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Postoperative hypersensitivity in class I resin-based composite restorations in general practice: interim results.

Authors:  Gary S Berkowitz; Allan J Horowitz; Fredrick A Curro; Ronald G Craig; Jonathan A Ship; Donald Vena; Van P Thompson
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

3.  Two-year clinical performance of two one-step self-etching adhesives in the restoration of cervical lesions.

Authors:  A Schattenberg; U Werling; B Willershausen; C-P Ernst
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  [Evaluation of wear property of Giomer and universal composite in vivo].

Authors:  H L Mu; F C Tian; X Y Wang; X J Gao
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-12-21

5.  Effect of 940 nm laser diode irradiation prior to bonding procedure on postoperative sensitivity following class II composite restorations: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Loghman Rezaei-Soufi; Mojgan Taheri; Reza Fekrazadas; Maryam Farhadian
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.

Authors:  Bruno Baracco; M Victoria Fuentes; Laura Ceballos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  A prospective 8-year follow-up of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth of children and adolescents in Public Dental Health Service: reasons for replacement.

Authors:  Ulla Pallesen; Jan W V van Dijken; Jette Halken; Anna-Lena Hallonsten; Ruth Höigaard
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  A comparative evaluation of dentinal hypersensitivity and microleakage associated with composite restorations in cavities preconditioned with air abrasion - An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ankit Arora; Shashi Rashmi Acharya; Saraswathi M Vidya; Padmaja Sharma
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-07

9.  Postoperative sensitivity in Class V composite restorations: Comparing soft start vs. constant curing modes of LED.

Authors:  Fahad Umer; Frahan Raza Khan
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.