Literature DB >> 23070922

Pathological subtrochanteric fractures in 194 patients: a comparison of outcome after surgical treatment of pathological and non-pathological fractures.

Rüdiger J Weiss1, Wilhelmina Ekström, Bjarne H Hansen, Johnny Keller, Minna Laitinen, Clement Trovik, Olga Zaikova, Rikard Wedin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of pathological subtrochanteric fractures has been associated with technical difficulties and frequent failures. We analyzed survival, risk factors for death, and outcome after surgical treatment.
METHODS: The study group consisted of 194 patients with pathological subtrochanteric femur fractures operated during 1999-2009. Cox multiple-regression analysis was performed to study risk factors and results were expressed as hazard ratios (HR). We included a control group with non-pathological subtrochanteric fractures (n = 87) for comparison.
RESULTS: The median age at surgery was 68 (29-96) years in the study group and 82 (66-101) in the controls. The 1-year survival rate after surgery was 33% (95% CI: 26-40) in the study group and 85% (79-93) in the controls. In the study group, the risk of death after surgery was increased for patients ≥65 years of age (HR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1), with a moderate (HR 2.2, 1.5-3.4) and poor (HR 2.9, 1.6-5.2) Karnofsky score, with visceral metastases (HR 1.6, 1.1-2.3), and perioperative hemoglobin levels <100 g/L (HR 2.2, 1.3-3.7). In patients with pathological fractures, there was no statistically significant difference concerning reoperation rates comparing intramedullary nails (9%) with endoprostheses (6%; P = 0.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for pathological subtrochanteric femur fractures is a relatively safe and effective procedure.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23070922     DOI: 10.1002/jso.23277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  10 in total

1.  What Factors Are Associated With Implant Breakage and Revision After Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Metastases?

Authors:  Julie J Willeumier; Mustafa Kaynak; Peer van der Zwaal; Sven A G Meylaerts; Nina M C Mathijssen; Paul C Jutte; Panagiotis Tsagozis; Rikard Wedin; Michiel A J van de Sande; Marta Fiocco; P D Sander Dijkstra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  CORR Insights®: What Factors Are Associated With Implant Breakage and Revision After Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Metastases?

Authors:  Ying-Lee Lam
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  C-reactive protein and tumour diagnosis predict survival in patients treated surgically for long bone metastases.

Authors:  Costantino Errani; Monica Cosentino; Giovanni Ciani; Lorenzo Ferra; Patricio A Alfaro; Barbara Bordini; Davide M Donati
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Real-life management and outcome of thyroid carcinoma-related bone metastases: results from a nationwide multicenter experience.

Authors:  G Mazziotti; A M Formenti; M B Panarotto; E Arvat; A Chiti; A Cuocolo; M E Dottorini; C Durante; L Agate; S Filetti; F Felicetti; A Filice; L Pace; T Pellegrino; M Rodari; M Salvatori; C Tranfaglia; A Versari; D Viola; S Frara; A Berruti; A Giustina; R Giubbini
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Treatment for long bone metastases based on a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Costantino Errani; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Luca Cevolani; Silvia Spinelli; Andrea Piccioli; Giulio Maccauro; Nicola Baldini; Davide Donati
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-20

Review 6.  Fractures in bone tumour prosthesis.

Authors:  Andrea Piccioli; Barbara Rossi; Federico Maria Sacchetti; Maria Silvia Spinelli; Alberto Di Martino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Do Cohabitants Reliably Complete Questionnaires for Patients in a Terminal Cancer Stage when Assessing Quality of Life, Pain, Depression, and Anxiety?

Authors:  Olivier Q Groot; Nuno Rui Paulino Pereira; Michiel E R Bongers; Paul T Ogink; Erik T Newman; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; Kevin A Raskin; Santiago A Lozano-Calderon; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [Subtrochanteric femur fractures-epidemiology, surgical procedures, influence of time to surgery and comorbidities on complications : A risk-adjusted regression analysis of routine data from 2124 cases].

Authors:  C M Müller-Mai; D Deitert; S Hörter; U S Schulze Raestrup; C Zwillich; R Smektala
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Case report demonstrating effectiveness of sorafenib in multiple lung and bone metastases of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Manabu Hoshi; Naoto Oebisu; Jun Takada; Tdashi Iwai; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Intramedullary nailing has sufficient durability for metastatic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Takaaki Tanaka; Jungo Imanishi; Chris Charoenlap; Peter F M Choong
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.754

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.