Literature DB >> 33392607

Definitions of Computer-Assisted Surgery and Intervention, Image-Guided Surgery and Intervention, Hybrid Operating Room, and Guidance Systems: Strasbourg International Consensus Study.

Mariano Giménez1,2,3, Benôit Gallix2,4, Guido Costamagna5, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey6, Michael Moche7, Go Wakabayashi8, Reto Bale9, Lee Swanström2, Jürgen Futterer10, David Geller11, Juan M Verde1,2,3, Alain García Vazquez1,2,3, Ivo Boškoski5, Nicolas Golse12, Beat Müller-Stich13, Bernard Dallemagne1,2,14, Mårten Falkenberg15, Sven Jonas16, Carina Riediger17, Michele Diana1, Niklas Kvarnström18, Bruno C Odisio19, Edgardo Serra3, Christiaan Overduin20, Mariano Palermo3, Didier Mutter1,2,14, Silvana Perretta1,2,14, Patrick Pessaux1,2,14, Luc Soler21, Alexandre Hostettler1, Toby Collins2, Stéphane Cotin22, Michael Kostrzewa2, Amilcar Alzaga23, Martin Smith24, Jacques Marescaux1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus definitions of image-guided surgery, computer-assisted surgery, hybrid operating room, and surgical navigation systems. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The use of minimally invasive procedures has increased tremendously over the past 2 decades, but terminology related to image-guided minimally invasive procedures has not been standardized, which is a barrier to clear communication.
METHODS: Experts in image-guided techniques and specialized engineers were invited to engage in a systematic process to develop consensus definitions of the key terms listed above. The process was designed following review of common consensus-development methodologies and included participation in 4 online surveys and a post-surveys face-to-face panel meeting held in Strasbourg, France.
RESULTS: The experts settled on the terms computer-assisted surgery and intervention, image-guided surgery and intervention, hybrid operating room, and guidance systems and agreed-upon definitions of these terms, with rates of consensus of more than 80% for each term. The methodology used proved to be a compelling strategy to overcome the current difficulties related to data growth rates and technological convergence in this field.
CONCLUSIONS: Our multidisciplinary collaborative approach resulted in consensus definitions that may improve communication, knowledge transfer, collaboration, and research in the rapidly changing field of image-guided minimally invasive techniques.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer assistance; guidance systems; hybrid operating room; image guidance; minimal invasion

Year:  2020        PMID: 33392607      PMCID: PMC7771637          DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Open        ISSN: 2691-3593


  13 in total

1.  Society of Cardiovascular & Interventional Radiology position statement on radiation safety.

Authors:  J F Cardella; D L Miller; P E Cole; C A Lewis
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Is There a Consensus on Consensus Methodology? Descriptions and Recommendations for Future Consensus Research.

Authors:  Jane Waggoner; Jan D Carline; Steven J Durning
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Gastric access temporary for endoscopy (GATE): a proposed algorithm for EUS-directed transgastric ERCP in gastric bypass patients.

Authors:  Thomas J Wang; Christopher C Thompson; Marvin Ryou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Using the consensus development conference method in healthcare research.

Authors:  Elizabeth Halcomb; Patricia Davidson; Laura Hardaker
Journal:  Nurse Res       Date:  2008

5.  An innovative technique using a percutaneously placed guidewire allows for higher success rate for ERCP compared to balloon enteroscopy assistance in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy.

Authors:  Tarek Sawas; Andrew C Storm; Fateh Bazerbachi; Chad J Fleming; Eric J Vargas; Vinay Chandrasekhara; James C Andrews; Michael J Levy; John A Martin; Bret T Petersen; Mark D Topazian; Barham K Abu Dayyeh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Evolving techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in gastric bypass patients.

Authors:  Thomas J Wang; Marvin Ryou
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.287

Review 7.  The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review.

Authors:  Susan Humphrey-Murto; Lara Varpio; Timothy J Wood; Carol Gonsalves; Lee-Anne Ufholz; Kelly Mascioli; Carol Wang; Thomas Foth
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  EUS-directed Transgastric ERCP (EDGE) Versus Laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP) for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Anatomy: A Multicenter Early Comparative Experience of Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Prashant Kedia; Paul R Tarnasky; Jose Nieto; Stephen L Steele; Ali Siddiqui; Ming-Ming Xu; Amy Tyberg; Monica Gaidhane; Michel Kahaleh
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.062

9.  Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy and lithotripsy in treating difficult biliary ductal stones: Two case reports.

Authors:  Edward Alabraba; Simon Travis; Ian Beckingham
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-04-16

10.  Overall outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted ERCP after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction subgroup analysis.

Authors:  David May; Ellen Vogels; David Parker; Anthony Petrick; David Diehl; Jon Gabrielsen
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-10-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Image-guided procedures in the hybrid operating room: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Ilse M Spenkelink; Jan Heidkamp; Jurgen J Fütterer; Maroeska M Rovers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Augmented Reality and Image-Guided Robotic Liver Surgery.

Authors:  Fabio Giannone; Emanuele Felli; Zineb Cherkaoui; Pietro Mascagni; Patrick Pessaux
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 6.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.