Literature DB >> 33389409

A clinical calculator to predict disease outcomes in women with triple-negative breast cancer.

Mei-Yin C Polley1, Roberto A Leon-Ferre2, Samuel Leung3, Angela Cheng3, Dongxia Gao3, Jason Sinnwell4, Heshan Liu4, David W Hillman4, Abraham Eyman-Casey4, Judith A Gilbert5, Vivian Negron5, Judy C Boughey6, Minetta C Liu2, James N Ingle2, Krishna Kalari4, Fergus Couch5, Jodi M Carter5, Daniel W Visscher5, Torsten O Nielsen3, Matthew P Goetz2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, characterized by substantial risks of early disease recurrence and mortality. We constructed and validated clinical calculators for predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for TNBC.
METHODS: Data from 605 women with centrally confirmed TNBC who underwent primary breast cancer surgery at Mayo Clinic during 1985-2012 were used to train risk models. Variables included age, menopausal status, tumor size, nodal status, Nottingham grade, surgery type, adjuvant radiation therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, Ki67, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) score, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Final models were internally validated for calibration and discrimination using ten-fold cross-validation and compared with their base-model counterparts which include only tumor size and nodal status. Independent external validation was performed using data from 478 patients diagnosed with stage II/III invasive TNBC during 1986-1992 in the British Columbia Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit database.
RESULTS: Final RFS and OS models were well calibrated and associated with C-indices of 0.72 and 0.73, as compared with 0.64 and 0.62 of the base models (p < 0.001). In external validation, the discriminant ability of the final models was comparable to the base models (C-index: 0.59-0.61). The RFS model demonstrated greater accuracy than the base model both overall and within patient subgroups, but the advantages of the OS model were less profound.
CONCLUSIONS: This TNBC clinical calculator can be used to predict patient outcomes and may aid physician's communication with TNBC patients regarding their long-term disease outlook and planning treatment strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical calculator; Prognosis; Prognostic factors; Triple-negative breast cancer

Year:  2021        PMID: 33389409      PMCID: PMC7925385          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06030-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  37 in total

1.  Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker.

Authors:  P J Heagerty; T Lumley; M S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014.

Authors:  R Salgado; C Denkert; S Demaria; N Sirtaine; F Klauschen; G Pruneri; S Wienert; G Van den Eynden; F L Baehner; F Penault-Llorca; E A Perez; E A Thompson; W F Symmans; A L Richardson; J Brock; C Criscitiello; H Bailey; M Ignatiadis; G Floris; J Sparano; Z Kos; T Nielsen; D L Rimm; K H Allison; J S Reis-Filho; S Loibl; C Sotiriou; G Viale; S Badve; S Adams; K Willard-Gallo; S Loi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Impact of histopathology, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and adjuvant chemotherapy on prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Roberto A Leon-Ferre; Mei-Yin Polley; Heshan Liu; Judith A Gilbert; Victoria Cafourek; David W Hillman; Ahmed Elkhanany; Margaret Akinhanmi; Jenna Lilyquist; Abigail Thomas; Vivian Negron; Judy C Boughey; Minetta C Liu; James N Ingle; Krishna R Kalari; Fergus J Couch; Daniel W Visscher; Matthew P Goetz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Genes associated with histopathologic features of triple negative breast tumors predict molecular subtypes.

Authors:  Kristen S Purrington; Daniel W Visscher; Chen Wang; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; Ute Hamann; Heli Nevanlinna; Angela Cox; Graham G Giles; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Sotiris Lakis; Vassiliki Kotoula; George Fountzilas; Maria Kabisch; Thomas Rüdiger; Päivi Heikkilä; Carl Blomqvist; Simon S Cross; Melissa C Southey; Janet E Olson; Judy Gilbert; Sandra Deming-Halverson; Veli-Matti Kosma; Christine Clarke; Rodney Scott; J Louise Jones; Wei Zheng; Arto Mannermaa; Diana M Eccles; Celine M Vachon; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  A population-based validation of the prognostic model PREDICT for early breast cancer.

Authors:  G C Wishart; C D Bajdik; E M Azzato; E Dicks; D C Greenberg; J Rashbass; C Caldas; P D P Pharoah
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis.

Authors:  Sue Harnan; Paul Tappenden; Katy Cooper; John Stevens; Alice Bessey; Rachid Rafia; Sue Ward; Ruth Wong; Robert C Stein; Janet Brown
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts response to chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  S Chae; K M Kang; H J Kim; E Kang; S Y Park; J H Kim; S H Kim; S W Kim; E K Kim
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Triple negative breast cancer - prognostic factors and survival.

Authors:  Tanja Ovcaricek; Snjezana Grazio Frkovic; Erika Matos; Barbara Mozina; Simona Borstnar
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancers from two phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trials: ECOG 2197 and ECOG 1199.

Authors:  Sylvia Adams; Robert J Gray; Sandra Demaria; Lori Goldstein; Edith A Perez; Lawrence N Shulman; Silvana Martino; Molin Wang; Vicky E Jones; Thomas J Saphner; Antonio C Wolff; William C Wood; Nancy E Davidson; George W Sledge; Joseph A Sparano; Sunil S Badve
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ellen R Copson; Tom C Maishman; Will J Tapper; Ramsey I Cutress; Stephanie Greville-Heygate; Douglas G Altman; Bryony Eccles; Sue Gerty; Lorraine T Durcan; Louise Jones; D Gareth Evans; Alastair M Thompson; Paul Pharoah; Douglas F Easton; Alison M Dunning; Andrew Hanby; Sunil Lakhani; Ros Eeles; Fiona J Gilbert; Hisham Hamed; Shirley Hodgson; Peter Simmonds; Louise Stanton; Diana M Eccles
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of financial support on the prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer from 2002 to 2020: a prospective cohort from western China.

Authors:  Dan Zheng; Linlin Song; Xu Liu; Xiaorong Zhong; Yuxin Xie; Chengshi Wang; Ping He; Xi Yan; Tinglun Tian; Hong Zheng; Ting Luo
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-05

2.  Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival and Assessing the Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Treatment in pT1-2N0M0 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Based Study.

Authors:  Qixin Mao; Shanqing Liu; Minhao Lv; Yadong Sun; Chongjian Zhang; Lianfang Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Survival prediction in triple negative breast cancer using multiple instance learning of histopathological images.

Authors:  Piumi Sandarenu; Ewan K A Millar; Yang Song; Lois Browne; Julia Beretov; Jodi Lynch; Peter H Graham; Jitendra Jonnagaddala; Nicholas Hawkins; Junzhou Huang; Erik Meijering
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Multiplexed imaging analysis of the tumor-immune microenvironment reveals predictors of outcome in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Aalok Patwa; Rikiya Yamashita; Jin Long; Tyler Risom; Michael Angelo; Leeat Keren; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-07-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.