PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, characterized by substantial risks of early disease recurrence and mortality. We constructed and validated clinical calculators for predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for TNBC. METHODS: Data from 605 women with centrally confirmed TNBC who underwent primary breast cancer surgery at Mayo Clinic during 1985-2012 were used to train risk models. Variables included age, menopausal status, tumor size, nodal status, Nottingham grade, surgery type, adjuvant radiation therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, Ki67, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) score, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Final models were internally validated for calibration and discrimination using ten-fold cross-validation and compared with their base-model counterparts which include only tumor size and nodal status. Independent external validation was performed using data from 478 patients diagnosed with stage II/III invasive TNBC during 1986-1992 in the British Columbia Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit database. RESULTS: Final RFS and OS models were well calibrated and associated with C-indices of 0.72 and 0.73, as compared with 0.64 and 0.62 of the base models (p < 0.001). In external validation, the discriminant ability of the final models was comparable to the base models (C-index: 0.59-0.61). The RFS model demonstrated greater accuracy than the base model both overall and within patient subgroups, but the advantages of the OS model were less profound. CONCLUSIONS: This TNBC clinical calculator can be used to predict patient outcomes and may aid physician's communication with TNBC patients regarding their long-term disease outlook and planning treatment strategies.
PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, characterized by substantial risks of early disease recurrence and mortality. We constructed and validated clinical calculators for predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for TNBC. METHODS: Data from 605 women with centrally confirmed TNBC who underwent primary breast cancer surgery at Mayo Clinic during 1985-2012 were used to train risk models. Variables included age, menopausal status, tumor size, nodal status, Nottingham grade, surgery type, adjuvant radiation therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, Ki67, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) score, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Final models were internally validated for calibration and discrimination using ten-fold cross-validation and compared with their base-model counterparts which include only tumor size and nodal status. Independent external validation was performed using data from 478 patients diagnosed with stage II/III invasive TNBC during 1986-1992 in the British Columbia Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit database. RESULTS: Final RFS and OS models were well calibrated and associated with C-indices of 0.72 and 0.73, as compared with 0.64 and 0.62 of the base models (p < 0.001). In external validation, the discriminant ability of the final models was comparable to the base models (C-index: 0.59-0.61). The RFS model demonstrated greater accuracy than the base model both overall and within patient subgroups, but the advantages of the OS model were less profound. CONCLUSIONS: This TNBC clinical calculator can be used to predict patient outcomes and may aid physician's communication with TNBC patients regarding their long-term disease outlook and planning treatment strategies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clinical calculator; Prognosis; Prognostic factors; Triple-negative breast cancer
Authors: R Salgado; C Denkert; S Demaria; N Sirtaine; F Klauschen; G Pruneri; S Wienert; G Van den Eynden; F L Baehner; F Penault-Llorca; E A Perez; E A Thompson; W F Symmans; A L Richardson; J Brock; C Criscitiello; H Bailey; M Ignatiadis; G Floris; J Sparano; Z Kos; T Nielsen; D L Rimm; K H Allison; J S Reis-Filho; S Loibl; C Sotiriou; G Viale; S Badve; S Adams; K Willard-Gallo; S Loi Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Roberto A Leon-Ferre; Mei-Yin Polley; Heshan Liu; Judith A Gilbert; Victoria Cafourek; David W Hillman; Ahmed Elkhanany; Margaret Akinhanmi; Jenna Lilyquist; Abigail Thomas; Vivian Negron; Judy C Boughey; Minetta C Liu; James N Ingle; Krishna R Kalari; Fergus J Couch; Daniel W Visscher; Matthew P Goetz Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kristen S Purrington; Daniel W Visscher; Chen Wang; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; Ute Hamann; Heli Nevanlinna; Angela Cox; Graham G Giles; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Sotiris Lakis; Vassiliki Kotoula; George Fountzilas; Maria Kabisch; Thomas Rüdiger; Päivi Heikkilä; Carl Blomqvist; Simon S Cross; Melissa C Southey; Janet E Olson; Judy Gilbert; Sandra Deming-Halverson; Veli-Matti Kosma; Christine Clarke; Rodney Scott; J Louise Jones; Wei Zheng; Arto Mannermaa; Diana M Eccles; Celine M Vachon; Fergus J Couch Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: G C Wishart; C D Bajdik; E M Azzato; E Dicks; D C Greenberg; J Rashbass; C Caldas; P D P Pharoah Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Sue Harnan; Paul Tappenden; Katy Cooper; John Stevens; Alice Bessey; Rachid Rafia; Sue Ward; Ruth Wong; Robert C Stein; Janet Brown Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Sylvia Adams; Robert J Gray; Sandra Demaria; Lori Goldstein; Edith A Perez; Lawrence N Shulman; Silvana Martino; Molin Wang; Vicky E Jones; Thomas J Saphner; Antonio C Wolff; William C Wood; Nancy E Davidson; George W Sledge; Joseph A Sparano; Sunil S Badve Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ellen R Copson; Tom C Maishman; Will J Tapper; Ramsey I Cutress; Stephanie Greville-Heygate; Douglas G Altman; Bryony Eccles; Sue Gerty; Lorraine T Durcan; Louise Jones; D Gareth Evans; Alastair M Thompson; Paul Pharoah; Douglas F Easton; Alison M Dunning; Andrew Hanby; Sunil Lakhani; Ros Eeles; Fiona J Gilbert; Hisham Hamed; Shirley Hodgson; Peter Simmonds; Louise Stanton; Diana M Eccles Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Piumi Sandarenu; Ewan K A Millar; Yang Song; Lois Browne; Julia Beretov; Jodi Lynch; Peter H Graham; Jitendra Jonnagaddala; Nicholas Hawkins; Junzhou Huang; Erik Meijering Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-08-25 Impact factor: 4.996