Xiaofeng Xu1, Dongdong Li1, Lan Yang1, Xiujuan Jing1, Xiangyi Kong1, Dezhu Chen2, Tong Ru1, Huaijun Zhou3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China. zhouhj2007@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To summarize the outcomes of different surgical treatment modalities for cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) at a single institution over 8 years. METHODS: A case series of patients diagnosed with CSP who were admitted to Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2011 to December 2018 was retrospectively studied. Medical records of all the patients were carefully reviewed. Data on patient demographics, pregnancy characteristics, treatment modalities, response to therapy, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients undergoing surgical treatments for CSP were included. Thirty-three patients (28.21%) underwent ultrasound-guided curettage; while, 74 (63.25%) and 10 (8.55%) patients received laparoscopy-monitored curettage and laparoscopic CSP resection, respectively. Most of the patients (21/33) who underwent ultrasound-guided surgery had type I CSP; while, 54 out of 84 patients who opted for laparoscopic surgeries had type II CSP. Eleven women underwent a uterine artery embolization procedure before the operation. There was no difference in the use of an intrauterine balloon for hemostasis among the three groups. Only 8 patients needed additional systemic methotrexate treatment. Twenty-four out of 57 women (42.11%) succeeded in conceiving again and gave birth to 21 healthy babies. Only 1 woman (1/24, 4.17%) experienced recurrence of CSP. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicated the safety and efficiency of ultrasound-guided curettage, laparoscopy-monitored curettage, and laparoscopic CSP resection for the treatment of CSP.
PURPOSE: To summarize the outcomes of different surgical treatment modalities for cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) at a single institution over 8 years. METHODS: A case series of patients diagnosed with CSP who were admitted to Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2011 to December 2018 was retrospectively studied. Medical records of all the patients were carefully reviewed. Data on patient demographics, pregnancy characteristics, treatment modalities, response to therapy, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients undergoing surgical treatments for CSP were included. Thirty-three patients (28.21%) underwent ultrasound-guided curettage; while, 74 (63.25%) and 10 (8.55%) patients received laparoscopy-monitored curettage and laparoscopic CSP resection, respectively. Most of the patients (21/33) who underwent ultrasound-guided surgery had type I CSP; while, 54 out of 84 patients who opted for laparoscopic surgeries had type II CSP. Eleven women underwent a uterine artery embolization procedure before the operation. There was no difference in the use of an intrauterine balloon for hemostasis among the three groups. Only 8 patients needed additional systemic methotrexate treatment. Twenty-four out of 57 women (42.11%) succeeded in conceiving again and gave birth to 21 healthy babies. Only 1 woman (1/24, 4.17%) experienced recurrence of CSP. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicated the safety and efficiency of ultrasound-guided curettage, laparoscopy-monitored curettage, and laparoscopic CSP resection for the treatment of CSP.
Authors: G Cali; F Forlani; I E Timor-Tritsch; J Palacios-Jaraquemada; G Minneci; F D'Antonio Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Olga Grechukhina; Uma Deshmukh; Linda Fan; Katherine Kohari; Sonya Abdel-Razeq; Mert Ozan Bahtiyar; Anna K Sfakianaki Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 7.661