Literature DB >> 30303911

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy, Incidence, and Recurrence: Five-Year Experience at a Single Tertiary Care Referral Center.

Olga Grechukhina1, Uma Deshmukh, Linda Fan, Katherine Kohari, Sonya Abdel-Razeq, Mert Ozan Bahtiyar, Anna K Sfakianaki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the treatment and subsequent pregnancy outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancies at a single institution over 5 years.
METHODS: This is a case series of all cesarean scar pregnancies diagnosed from May 2013 to March 2018 at Yale-New Haven Hospital. Data were collected on each patient using electronic medical record review and included patient demographics; medical, surgical, and obstetric history; pregnancy characteristics; treatment modalities used; response to therapy; complications; and subsequent pregnancy outcomes.
RESULTS: Thirty cases of cesarean scar pregnancies were diagnosed in 26 patients, including one recurrence in one patient and three recurrences in another. Forty-six percent of cesarean scar pregnancies were in Hispanic women. The median number of prior cesarean deliveries was two. Mean gestational age at the time of diagnosis was 46 days (SD±10). Fetal cardiac activity was detected in 18 cases. Three patients initially were erroneously diagnosed with a viable intrauterine pregnancy and failed medical termination. Others opted for termination through systemic methotrexate alone (n=4), systemic and local methotrexate (n=12), systemic and local methotrexate with potassium chloride injected into the gestational sac (n=3), potassium chloride injection with laparotomy and wedge resection (n=1), methotrexate with bilateral uterine artery embolization (n=2), or intrauterine balloon (n=4). Five patients who underwent expectant management or methotrexate therapy had retained products of conception and required hysteroscopy and curettage. One patient opted for hysterectomy after failed curettage. After complete resolution of cesarean scar pregnancies, there were 10 subsequent spontaneous conceptions in eight patients, including four recurrent cesarean scar pregnancies, four term pregnancies, and one spontaneous abortion. One viable normally located pregnancy is ongoing.
CONCLUSION: There is a wide array of treatment modalities available for cesarean scar pregnancies. Women with a cesarean scar pregnancy are at risk for its recurrence in the future, although normal pregnancy after a cesarean scar pregnancy is also possible. Safe outcomes depend on timely diagnosis and multidisciplinary care by skilled clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30303911     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  14 in total

1.  The Importance of Ectopic Mindedness: Scar Ectopic Pregnancy, a Diagnostic Dilemma.

Authors:  Vina Kumari; Himanshu Kumar; Mamta R Datta
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-02-02

2.  Exclusive use of intrasac potassium chloride and methotrexate for treating cesarean scar pregnancy: effectiveness and subsequent fecundity.

Authors:  Tejas Gundewar; Monna Pandurangi; N Sanjeeva Reddy; Radha Vembu; Chitra Andrews; Siddharth Nagireddy; Ashish Soni; Vivek Kakkad
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-05-18

3.  Surgical outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy: an 8-year experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Xu; Dongdong Li; Lan Yang; Xiujuan Jing; Xiangyi Kong; Dezhu Chen; Tong Ru; Huaijun Zhou
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Ultrasonographic technique to differentiate enhanced myometrial vascularity/arteriovenous malformation from retained products of conception.

Authors:  Mili Thakur; Michael R Strug; Jessica Garcia De Paredes; Anupama Rambhatla; Marcos I Cordoba Munoz
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-03-02

5.  Clinical Efficacy of Combined Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Surgery and Reversible Ligation of the Uterine Artery for Excision and Repair of Uterine Scar in Patients with Type II and III Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Lina Huang; Lingjun Zhao; Huiwei Shi
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-06-29

6.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Evaluation of Mifepristone for Treatment of Low-Risk Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Xi Xiong; Chun-Yan Gao; De-Mei Ying; Ping Yan; Zhi-Jia Zhang; Na Kuang; Hong-Ju Tian; Li Luo; Shu-Yu Long; Zheng-Qiong Chen
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  A study on the timing of uterine artery embolization followed by pregnancy excision for cesarean scar pregnancy: a prospective study in China.

Authors:  Liping Yu; Zhuowei Xue; Bikang Yang; Qinyang Xu; Yincheng Teng
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  A Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Curettage With and Without Uterine Artery Embolization on Controlling Intraoperative Blood Loss for a Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treatment: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Yunhui Tang; Yi Zhang; Hanqing Tang; Jiahui Che; Hua Feng; Xiaoying Yao; Qi Chen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Cesarean scar pregnancy with devastating profuse vaginal bleeding.

Authors:  Brahmana Askandar Tjokroprawiro; Muhammad Ilham Aldika Akbar
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-15

10.  Subsequent Fertility in Women Treated for Caesarean Scar Pregnancy With Hysteroscopy: A 5-Year Follow-Up Descriptive Study in a Tertiary Hospital.

Authors:  Xinyi Sun; Yang Liu; Yunhui Tang; Hongying Yu; Min Zhao; Qi Chen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.