Literature DB >> 3338886

Disparity range for binocular summation.

D Rose1, R Blake, D L Halpern.   

Abstract

Binocular summation of contrast and stereopsis have been linked because they both disappear under certain pathological conditions. The dependence of stereopsis on spatial frequency prompted us to examine how binocular summation varies with both spatial frequency and binocular disparity. We therefore measured binocular summation at different disparities using spatially localized stimuli which were also restricted in their Fourier composition. Contrast thresholds were measured using three interleaved forced-choice staircases for left and right eye monocular stimuli and a binocular stimulus composed of the two monocular stimuli presented simultaneously. At zero disparity binocular thresholds were 1.4 to 1.6 times lower than monocular. As disparity was increased the ratio between the thresholds became smaller, such that at large disparities it was near 1.2, the value expected from probability summation. The range of disparities over which probability summation was exceeded varied with the spatial frequency of the stimulus. At 6.0 cpd the range was 2-3 deg, but at 2.0 cpd or 0.75 cpd the range increased to 4-6 deg. These values closely parallel the range of disparities over which stereoscopic depth sensations occur, but they exceed the limits within which disparate images of an object can be fused into a single percept. The results support the contentions that "neural" summation occurs in the mechanism for stereopsis, that this mechanism uses spatial frequency selective channels, and that this mechanism is separate from the mechanism which mediates fusion.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3338886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  9 in total

1.  Panum's fusional area estimated with a criterion-free technique.

Authors:  T Heckmann; C M Schor
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-04

2.  Neuronal convergence in early contrast vision: binocular summation is followed by response nonlinearity and area summation.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Robert J Summers
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Binocular contrast summation and inhibition depends on spatial frequency, eccentricity and binocular disparity.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The effect of interocular phase difference on perceived contrast.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Stuart A Wallis; Mark A Georgeson; Tim S Meese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Binocular visual function and fixational control in patients with macular disease: A review.

Authors:  Irina Sverdlichenko; Mark S Mandelcorn; Galia Issashar Leibovitzh; Efrem D Mandelcorn; Samuel N Markowitz; Luminita Tarita-Nistor
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 3.992

6.  Binocular fusion disorders impair basic visual processing.

Authors:  Laura Benhaim-Sitbon; Maria Lev; Uri Polat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Impact on stereo-acuity of two presbyopia correction approaches: monovision and small aperture inlay.

Authors:  Enrique J Fernández; Christina Schwarz; Pedro M Prieto; Silvestre Manzanera; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Binocular summation revisited: Beyond √2.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Freya A Lygo; Tim S Meese; Mark A Georgeson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Perceptual enhancement of suprathreshold luminance modulation in stereoscopic patterns.

Authors:  Goro Maehara; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.