Literature DB >> 33388057

CNFE-SE: a novel approach combining complex network-based feature engineering and stacked ensemble to predict the success of intrauterine insemination and ranking the features.

Sima Ranjbari1, Toktam Khatibi2, Ahmad Vosough Dizaji3, Hesamoddin Sajadi4, Mehdi Totonchi5,6, Firouzeh Ghaffari7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) outcome prediction is a challenging issue which the assisted reproductive technology (ART) practitioners are dealing with. Predicting the success or failure of IUI based on the couples' features can assist the physicians to make the appropriate decision for suggesting IUI to the couples or not and/or continuing the treatment or not for them. Many previous studies have been focused on predicting the in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome using machine learning algorithms. But, to the best of our knowledge, a few studies have been focused on predicting the outcome of IUI. The main aim of this study is to propose an automatic classification and feature scoring method to predict intrauterine insemination (IUI) outcome and ranking the most significant features.
METHODS: For this purpose, a novel approach combining complex network-based feature engineering and stacked ensemble (CNFE-SE) is proposed. Three complex networks are extracted considering the patients' data similarities. The feature engineering step is performed on the complex networks. The original feature set and/or the features engineered are fed to the proposed stacked ensemble to classify and predict IUI outcome for couples per IUI treatment cycle. Our study is a retrospective study of a 5-year couples' data undergoing IUI. Data is collected from Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute describing 11,255 IUI treatment cycles for 8,360 couples. Our dataset includes the couples' demographic characteristics, historical data about the patients' diseases, the clinical diagnosis, the treatment plans and the prescribed drugs during the cycles, semen quality, laboratory tests and the clinical pregnancy outcome.
RESULTS: Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms the compared methods with Area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.84 ± 0.01, sensitivity of 0.79 ± 0.01, specificity of 0.91 ± 0.01, and accuracy of 0.85 ± 0.01 for the prediction of IUI outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: The most important predictors for predicting IUI outcome are semen parameters (sperm motility and concentration) as well as female body mass index (BMI).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex networks; Feature engineering; Feature selection; IUI outcome prediction; Stacked ensemble classifier

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33388057      PMCID: PMC7778826          DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01362-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak        ISSN: 1472-6947            Impact factor:   2.796


  37 in total

1.  Cascaded classifiers and stacking methods for classification of pulmonary nodule characteristics.

Authors:  Aydin Kaya
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Predictive value of sperm morphology and progressively motile sperm count for pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Louise Lemmens; Snjezana Kos; Cornelis Beijer; Jacoline W Brinkman; Frans A L van der Horst; Leonie van den Hoven; Dorit C Kieslinger; Netty J van Trooyen-van Vrouwerff; Albert Wolthuis; Jan C M Hendriks; Alex M M Wetzels
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Intrauterine insemination: evaluation of the results according to the woman's age, sperm quality, total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis.

Authors:  A Campana; D Sakkas; A Stalberg; P G Bianchi; I Comte; T Pache; D Walker
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Effect of sperm morphology and motile sperm count on outcome of intrauterine insemination in oligozoospermia and/or asthenozoospermia.

Authors:  F Francavilla; R Romano; R Santucci; G Poccia
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Cancer gene search with data-mining and genetic algorithms.

Authors:  Shital Shah; Andrew Kusiak
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 6.  Machine Learning in Medicine.

Authors:  Rahul C Deo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  The evaluation of pre and post processing semen analysis parameters at the time of intrauterine insemination in couples diagnosed with male factor infertility and pregnancy rates based on stimulation agent. A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Stephanie M Luco; Chioma Agbo; Barry Behr; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Factors affecting live birth rate in intrauterine insemination cycles with recombinant gonadotrophin stimulation.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdem; Mehmet Erdem; Songul Atmaca; Umit Korucuoglu; Onur Karabacak
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  Patient-specific predictions of outcome after gonadotropin ovulation induction/intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Randi H Goldman; Maria Batsis; John C Petrozza; Irene Souter
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination: A prospective study of factors affecting outcome.

Authors:  Mohan S Kamath; Priya Bhave; Tk Aleyamma; Raju Nair; A Chandy; Ann M Mangalaraj; K Muthukumar; Korula George
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2010-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Utilization of Random Forest and Deep Learning Neural Network for Predicting Factors Affecting Perceived Usability of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing Mobile Application in Thailand "ThaiChana".

Authors:  Ardvin Kester S Ong; Thanatorn Chuenyindee; Yogi Tri Prasetyo; Reny Nadlifatin; Satria Fadil Persada; Ma Janice J Gumasing; Josephine D German; Kirstien Paola E Robas; Michael N Young; Thaninrat Sittiwatethanasiri
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  The Barriers of the Assistive Robotics Market-What Inhibits Health Innovation?

Authors:  Gabriel Aguiar Noury; Andreas Walmsley; Ray B Jones; Swen E Gaudl
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.