Literature DB >> 33386969

Relation between auditory memory and global memory in young and older adults.

Shubhaganga Dhrruvakumar1, Asha Yathiraj2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Controversy exists as to whether auditory memory is modality-specific or not. To determine this, the study investigated the relation between the scores obtained on an auditory memory test with that obtained on a global memory test in adults. The study also aimed to compare the scores of young and older adults on the two memory tests.
METHODS: Thirty young adults aged 18 to 30 years and 30 older adults aged 58 to 70 years, having normal hearing sensitivity, were studied. Auditory memory was evaluated using the 'Kannada auditory memory and sequencing test', while global memory was assessed using the memory domain of the 'Cognitive linguistic assessment protocol for Adults' and the 'Memory ability checklist'.
RESULTS: No significant correlation was seen between the scores obtained on the auditory memory and the global memory tests in both young adults as well as older adults. Also, the scores on the memory ability checklist did not show any correlation with either global memory scores or auditory memory scores in both participant groups. Additionally, the scores of the three memory measures were found to be significantly different from each other. The older adults obtained significantly poorer scores on all three memory tools compared to young adults.
CONCLUSION: The findings indicated that auditory memory is modality-specific and is independent of global memory. Additionally, all three measures were sensitive in detecting age-related decline in memory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ageing; Auditory memory; Global memory; Modality-specificity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33386969     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06512-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  16 in total

1.  Subjective memory beliefs and cognitive performance in normal and mildly impaired older adults.

Authors:  S Cook; M Marsiske
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.658

Review 2.  The importance of modality specificity in diagnosing central auditory processing disorder.

Authors:  Anthony T Cacace; Dennis J McFarland
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Serial report and item recognition of novel visual patterns.

Authors:  S E Avons
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1998-05

4.  Modality specificity of auditory and visual pattern recognition: implications for the assessment of central auditory processing disorders.

Authors:  D J McFarland; A T Cacace
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

5.  Auditory, visual and auditory-visual memory and sequencing performance in typically developing children.

Authors:  Roshni Pillai; Asha Yathiraj
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  The validity of new memory complaints in the elderly.

Authors:  P W Schofield; D Jacobs; K Marder; M Sano; Y Stern
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1997-06

7.  Memory complaints in healthy young and elderly adults: reliability of memory reporting.

Authors:  Tiago Mendes; Sandra Ginó; Filipa Ribeiro; Manuela Guerreiro; Gracinda de Sousa; Karen Ritchie; Alexandre de Mendonça
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.658

8.  Subjective memory complaints and objective memory impairment in the Vienna-Transdanube aging community.

Authors:  Susanne Jungwirth; Peter Fischer; Silvia Weissgram; Walter Kirchmeyr; Peter Bauer; Karl-Heinz Tragl
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Memory complaints and test performance in healthy elderly persons.

Authors:  Paulo Mattos; Valéria Lino; Luciana Rizo; Angela Alfano; Cátia Araújo; Ronir Raggio
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  2004-01-06       Impact factor: 1.420

10.  Auditory short-term memory behaves like visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Kristina M Visscher; Elina Kaplan; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.