| Literature DB >> 33384767 |
Vadim V Klimontov1, Anton I Korbut2, Iuliia S Taskaeva3, Nataliya P Bgatova3, Maksim V Dashkin2, Nikolai B Orlov4, Anna S Khotskina5, Evgenii L Zavyalov5, Thomas Klein6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Modern guidelines recommend sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors as the preferred antihyperglycemic agents for patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. However, the mechanisms underlying the renal protective effect of SGLT2 inhibitors are not fully understood. AIM: To estimate the effect of the SGLT2 inhibitor, empagliflozin (EMPA), on the structure of podocytes and nephrin expression in glomeruli in db/db diabetic mice.Entities:
Keywords: Albuminuria; Chronic kidney disease; Diabetes; Empagliflozin; Podocyte; Sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors
Year: 2020 PMID: 33384767 PMCID: PMC7754166 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v11.i12.596
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Diabetes ISSN: 1948-9358
Figure 1Design of the experiment. The db/db diabetic mice were randomized into vehicle and empagliflozin groups. Heterozygous non-diabetic db/+ mice were included as controls. The studied drug or vehicle was administered by gavage once per day from 8 to 16 wk of age. Procedure 1 at wk 8: Weight measurement, body composition assessment, blood and urine sampling. Procedure 2 at wk 12: Weight measurement, body composition assessment, blood sampling. Procedure 3 at wk 16: Weight measurement, body composition assessment, blood and urine sampling, sacrifice and kidney sampling. EMPA: Empagliflozin.
Body weight and fat mass in db/db and db/+ mice
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
| Body weight (g) | 8 | 26.8 (25.0-31.1) | 37.1 (32.1–41.6) | 37.4 (28.5–41.5) |
| 12 | 26.2 (23.5–28.2) | 37.5 (35.8–40.5) | 46.2 (38.8–53.0) | |
| 16 | 24.8 (21.6–27.7) | 37.8 (34.3–40.4) | 52.6 (42.5–62.2) | |
| Fat mass (g) | 8 | 3.1 (1.9–4.1) | 18.3 (16.2–22.5) | 18.4 (13.5–20.6) |
| 12 | 2.7 (1.9–3.3) | 19.5 (17.0–22.7) | 25.3 (21.7–30.9) | |
| 16 | 2.7 (2.1–4.5) | 19.6 (17.4–22.7) | 28.0 (22.2–35.3) | |
| Fat mass (%) | 8 | 11.4 (8.5–16.1) | 50.6 (46.6–55.3) | 49.3 (46.8–50.0) |
| 12 | 10.7 (8.1–12.4) | 52.5 (45.2–57.0) | 55.5 (51.5–58.3) | |
| 16 | 11.7 (7.6–13.2) | 55.0 (42.5–62.8) | 53.4 (49.1–56.7) | |
P< 0.01 vs non–diabetic control (db/+ mice, Mann-Whitney U-test).
P< 0.001 vs non–diabetic control (db/+ mice, Mann-Whitney U-test).
P< 0.01 vs placebo (Mann-Whitney U-test).
P< 0.001 vs placebo (Mann-Whitney U-test).
P< 0.01 vs wk 8 and 12 (ANOVA-χ2 test).
P < 0.001 vs wk 8 and 12 (ANOVA-χ2 test). Data are presented as medians (min–max values). EMPA: Empagliflozin.
Plasma biochemistry in db/+ and db/db mice
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
| Glucose (mmoL/L) | 8 | 9.50 (5.10–11.4) | 28.5 (16.8–40.1) | 23.1 (15.3–35.4) |
| 12 | 9.20 (6.10–9.50) | 30.4 (22.7–48.0) | 16.3 (13.6–20.7) | |
| 16 | 9.50 (8.50–12.2) | 32.7 (22.5–53.1) | 16.1 (9.9–23.6) | |
| Fructosamine (µmoL/L) | 8 | 237 (217–249) | 456 (424–511) | 480 (425–579) |
| 16 | 239 (222–296) | 622 (524–672) | 468 (341–491) | |
| Glycated albumin (µmoL/L) | 8 | 107 (103–127) | 227 (206–239) | 235 (217–261) |
| 16 | 117 (109–133) | 283 (252–349) | 210 (166–245) | |
| Total cholesterol (mmoL/L) | 8 | 2.76 (1.80–3.96) | 2.72 (1.48–4.86) | 2.76 (1.60–4.05) |
| 16 | 2.37 (1.98–2.97) | 3.57 (1.68–4.86) | 4.05 (2.10–5.22) | |
| HDL-cholesterol (mmoL/L) | 8 | 1.17 (0.50–1.62) | 1.20 (0.51–2.01) | 1.40 (0.93–1.89) |
| 16 | 1.26 (0.45–1.80) | 1.50 (0.48–2.19) | 2.31 (1.05–2.88) | |
| LDL-cholesterol (mmoL/L) | 8 | 1.32 (0.81–2.10) | 1.02 (0.84–2.72) | 1.07 (0.84–2.60) |
| 16 | 0.81(0.75–1.11) | 0.81 (0.72–1.14) | 1.05 (0.60–1.41) | |
| Triglycerides (mmoL/L) | 8 | 1.74 (0.90–2.70) | 1.14 (0.51–2.30) | 1.25 (0.87–2.30) |
| 16 | 1.35 (0.81–2.58) | 1.79 (1.17–3.54) | 1.77 (1.29–3.87) | |
| Creatinine (µmoL/L) | 8 | 67.0 (47.0–78.0) | 76.4 (70.2–84.2) | 70.5 (54.0–82.2) |
| 12 | 68.6 (48.5–74.5) | 76.5 (64.5–100.5) | 74.7 (46.2–85.8) | |
| 16 | 61.8 (54.0–71.7) | 75.6 (63.9–89.4) | 81.3 (55.8–91.2) | |
| Uric acid (µmoL/L) | 8 | 273 (104–420) | 173 (143–341) | 281 (165–507) |
| 16 | 235 (159–271) | 170 (143–187) | 204 (179-242) | |
P < 0.01 vs non-diabetic control (db/+ mice, Mann-Whitney U-test).
P < 0.001 vs non-diabetic control (db/+ mice, Mann-Whitney U-test).
P < 0.01 vs placebo db/db group (Mann-Whitney U-test).
P < 0.001 vs placebo db/db group (Mann-Whitney U-test).
P < 0.05 vs placebo db/db group (Mann-Whitney U-test).
P < 0.01 compared with wk 8 (Wilcoxon test). Data are presented as medians (min–max values). EMPA: Empagliflozin.
Plasma levels of leptin and insulin in db/+ and db/db mice
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 8 | 3.3 (1.4–6.54) | 97.1 (53.2–114.4) | 93.4 (80.8–133.1) |
| 16 | 3.8 (1.5–6.3) | 90.0 (21.2–151.4) | 136.4 (53.0–171.2) | |
| Insulin (ng/mL) | 8 | 5.6 (3.4–18.0) | 25.6 (11.5–45.2) | 21.2 (10.8–40.8) |
| 16 | 10.0 (2.1–22.2) | 22.1 (9.8–33.2) | 20.8 (6.0–56.7) | |
| Glucagon (ng/mL) | 8 | 370 (250–2670) | 660 (190–2760) | 450 (290–2180) |
| 16 | 370 (150–2120) | 605 (260–2960) | 390 (240–860) | |
P < 0.01 vs non-diabetic control (db/+ mice, Mann-Whitney U-test).
P < 0.001 vs non-diabetic control (db/+ mice, Mann-Whitney U-test).
P < 0.05 vs placebo (Mann-Whitney U-test).
P < 0.05 vs wk 8 (Wilcoxon test). Data are presented as medians (min–max values). EMPA: Empagliflozin.
Figure 2Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio at week 0 and week 8 of the experiment in non-diabetic The data are presented as medians, lower and upper quartiles. aP < 0.001 vs non-diabetic control (db/+ mice); bP < 0.001 vs placebo(Mann-Whitney U-test); cP < 0.01 vs week 8 (Wilcoxon test). EMPA: Empagliflozin.
Renal structural parameters in db/+ and db/db mice
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
| Mesangium, fractional volume (%) | 14.4 (9.8–18.5) | 38.6 (34.5–42.7) | 25.5 (20.4–35.8) |
| Capillaries, fractional volume (%) | 31.3 (28.9–38.7) | 34.6 (30.9–36.1) | 33.3 (29.5–37.0) |
| GBM, mean width (nm) | 135 (116–157) | 163 (135–203) | 139 (116–225) |
| Podocyte FPs, mean width (nm) | 220 (191–242) | 372 (299–426) | 203 (162–317) |
| Podocyte FPs (NA, nm–1) | 3.39 (3.00–3.79) | 2.73 (1.92–3.51) | 3.31 (2.32–4.18) |
P < 0.01 vs non-diabetic control (db/+ mice, Mann-Whitney U-test).
P < 0.05 vs non-diabetic control (db/+ mice, Mann-Whitney U-test).
P < 0.01 vs non-diabetic control (db/+ mice, Mann-Whitney U-test).
P < 0.001 vs placebo (Mann-Whitney U-test). Data are presented as medians (min–max values). GBM: Glomerular basement membrane; FPs: Foot processes; EMPA: Empagliflozin.
Figure 3Podocyte foot processes. A: Non-diabetic db/+ mice; B: Vehicle-treated db/db diabetic mice demonstrate effacement of podocyte foot processes(FPs); C: Empagliflozin restores the structure of FPs in db/db mice. Transmission electron microscopy: ×100000.
Figure 4Glomerular staining for nephrin. A:Non-diabetic db/+ mice; B: Vehicle-treated db/db mice; C: Empagliflozin-treated db/db mice; A-C: Immunohistochemistry with anti-nephrin antibody; D: Negative control.
Figure 6Volumetric density of nephrin-positive areas and TGF-β-positive areas in glomeruli of nondiabetic A: Nephrin-positive areas; B: TGF-β-positive areas. aP < 0.001 vs non-diabetic db/+ mice; bP < 0.01; cP < 0.001 vs vehicle treated db/db mice (Wilcoxon test). Vv: Volumetric density; TGF-β: Transforming growth factor β; EMPA: Empagliflozin.
Figure 5Glomerular staining for TGF-β. A:Non-diabetic db/+ mice; B: Vehicle-treated db/db mice; C: Empagliflozin-treated db/db mice; A-C: Immunohistochemistry with anti-TGF-β antibody; D: Negative control.
The relationships of glycemic control indicators, plasma creatinine and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio with renal structural parameters
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mesangial volume, VV | ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Capillary volume, VV | ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| GBM width | ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Podocyte FPs, width | ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Podocyte FPs, NA | ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Nephrin-positive areas in glomeruli, VV | ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| TGF-β positive areas in glomeruli, VV | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
UACR: Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio; GBM: Glomerular basement membrane; FPs: Foot processes; Vv: Volumetric density; TGF-β: Transforming growth factor β. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients are shown.