Literature DB >> 33384674

Influence of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound on the Microstructure and c-di-GMP Signaling of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms.

Lakshmi Deepika Bharatula1,2, Enrico Marsili2,3, Scott A Rice2,4, James J Kwan5.   

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms are typically more tolerant to antimicrobials compared to bacteria in the planktonic phase and therefore require alternative treatment approaches. Mechanical biofilm disruption from ultrasound may be such an alternative by circumventing rapid biofilm adaptation to antimicrobial agents. Although ultrasound facilitates biofilm dispersal and may enhance the effectiveness of antimicrobial agents, the resulting biological response of bacteria within the biofilms remains poorly understood. To address this question, we investigated the microstructural effects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms exposed to high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) at different acoustic pressures and the subsequent biological response. Confocal microscopy images indicated a clear microstructural response at peak negative pressures equal to or greater than 3.5 MPa. In this pressure amplitude range, HIFU partially reduced the biomass of cells and eroded exopolysaccharides from the biofilm. These pressures also elicited a biological response; we observed an increase in a biomarker for biofilm development (cyclic-di-GMP) proportional to ultrasound induced biofilm removal. Cyclic-di-GMP overproducing mutant strains were also more resilient to disruption from HIFU at these pressures. The biological response was further evidenced by an increase in the relative abundance of cyclic-di-GMP overproducing variants present in the biofilm after exposure to HIFU. Our results, therefore, suggest that both physical and biological effects of ultrasound on bacterial biofilms must be considered in future studies.
Copyright © 2020 Bharatula, Marsili, Rice and Kwan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIFU; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; biofilm; cyclic-di-GMP; microstructural effect

Year:  2020        PMID: 33384674      PMCID: PMC7769819          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.599407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


  55 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal genetics of Pseudomonas.

Authors:  B W Holloway; V Krishnapillai; A F Morgan
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1979-03

Review 2.  The accurate use of impedance analysis for the study of microbial electrochemical systems.

Authors:  Xochitl Dominguez-Benetton; Surajbhan Sevda; Karolien Vanbroekhoven; Deepak Pant
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  Minimization of treatment time for in vitro 1.1 MHz destruction of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Timothy A Bigelow; Larry J Halverson; Jill M Middendorf; Ben Rusk
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Surface attachment induces Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence.

Authors:  Albert Siryaporn; Sherry L Kuchma; George A O'Toole; Zemer Gitai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The effect of ultrasonic frequency upon enhanced killing of P. aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  Z Qian; R D Sagers; W G Pitt
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Inactivation of Planktonic Escherichia coli by Focused 2-MHz Ultrasound.

Authors:  Andrew A Brayman; Brian E MacConaghy; Yak-Nam Wang; Keith T Chan; Wayne L Monsky; Anna J McClenny; Thomas J Matula
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 7.  Ultrasound-enhanced drug delivery for cancer.

Authors:  Steven Mo; Constantin-C Coussios; Len Seymour; Robert Carlisle
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 6.648

8.  Evaluation and optimization of multiple fluorophore analysis of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm.

Authors:  Fiona J Baird; Marilyn P Wadsworth; Jane E Hill
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 9.  Sonobactericide: An Emerging Treatment Strategy for Bacterial Infections.

Authors:  Kirby R Lattwein; Himanshu Shekhar; Joop J P Kouijzer; Willem J B van Wamel; Christy K Holland; Klazina Kooiman
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 10.  Ultrasound-mediated therapies for the treatment of biofilms in chronic wounds: a review of present knowledge.

Authors:  Gareth LuTheryn; Peter Glynne-Jones; Jeremy S Webb; Dario Carugo
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.813

View more
  2 in total

1.  Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment.

Authors:  Cyrill Slezak; Karaleen Anderson; Tyson Hillock; Mariel Miller; Peter Dungel; Olga Kopp; Katja Sterflinger; Paul Slezak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  Applications of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy against Bacterial Biofilms.

Authors:  Sandile Phinda Songca; Yaw Adjei
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.