Literature DB >> 33384609

Heart Rate Dependency and Inter-Lead Variability of the T Peak - T End Intervals.

Irena Andršová1, Katerina Hnatkova2, Martina Šišáková1, Ondřej Toman1, Peter Smetana3, Katharina M Huster4, Petra Barthel4, Tomáš Novotný1, Georg Schmidt4, Marek Malik2.   

Abstract

The electrocardiographic (ECG) assessment of the T peak-T end (Tpe) intervals has been used in many clinical studies, but several related physiological aspects have not been reported. Specifically, the sources of the Tpe differences between different ECG leads have not been systematically researched, the relationship of Tpe duration to underlying heart rate has not been firmly established, and little is known about the mutual correspondence of Tpe intervals measured in different ECG leads. This study evaluated 796,620 10-s 12-lead ECGs obtained from long-term Holters recorded in 639 healthy subjects (311 female) aged 33.8 ± 9.4 years. For each ECG, transformation to orthogonal XYZ lead was used to measure Tpe in the orthogonal vector magnitude (used as a reference for lead-to-lead comparisons) and to construct a three-dimensional T wave loop. The loop roundness was expressed by a ratio between its circumference and length. These ratios were significantly related to the standard deviation of Tpe durations in different ECG leads. At the underlying heart rate of 60 beats per minute, Tpe intervals were shorter in female than in male individuals (82.5 ± 5.6 vs 90.0 ± 6.5 ms, p < 0.0001). When studying linear slopes between Tpe intervals measured in different leads and the underlying heart rate, we found only minimal heart rate dependency, which was not systematic across the ECG leads and/or across the population. For any ECG lead, positive Tpe/RR slope was found in some subjects (e.g., 79 and 25% of subjects for V2 and V4 measurements, respectively) and a negative Tpe/RR slope in other subjects (e.g., 40 and 65% for V6 and V5, respectively). The steepest positive and negative Tpe/RR slopes were found for measurements in lead V2 and V4, respectively. In all leads, the Tpe/RR slope values were close to zero, indicating, on average, Tpe changes well below 2 ms for RR interval changes of 100 ms. On average, longest Tpe intervals were measured in lead V2, the shortest in lead III. The study concludes that the Tpe intervals measured in different leads cannot be combined. Irrespective of the measured ECG lead, the Tpe interval is not systematically heart rate dependent, and no heart rate correction should be used in clinical Tpe investigations.
Copyright © 2020 Andršová, Hnatkova, Šišáková, Toman, Smetana, Huster, Barthel, Novotný, Schmidt and Malik.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECG lead comparison; T wave peak; T wave spatial loop; heart rate dependency; sex differences

Year:  2020        PMID: 33384609      PMCID: PMC7769826          DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.595815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Physiol        ISSN: 1664-042X            Impact factor:   4.566


  52 in total

Review 1.  Genotype-specific ECG patterns in long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Wojciech Zareba
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  Reconstruction of the Frank vectorcardiogram from standard electrocardiographic leads: diagnostic comparison of different methods.

Authors:  J A Kors; G van Herpen; A C Sittig; J H van Bemmel
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Subject-specific profiles of QT/RR hysteresis.

Authors:  Marek Malik; Katerina Hnatkova; Tomas Novotny; Georg Schmidt
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Measurement error as a source of QT dispersion: a computerised analysis.

Authors:  J A Kors; G van Herpen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Proarrhythmic safety of repeat doses of mirabegron in healthy subjects: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-, and active-controlled thorough QT study.

Authors:  M Malik; E M van Gelderen; J H Lee; D L Kowalski; M Yen; R Goldwater; S K Mujais; M P Schaddelee; P de Koning; A Kaibara; S S Moy; J J Keirns
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 6.  Drug-induced torsades de pointes and implications for drug development.

Authors:  Robert R Fenichel; Marek Malik; Charles Antzelevitch; Michael Sanguinetti; Dan M Roden; Silvia G Priori; Jeremy N Ruskin; Raymond J Lipicky; Louis R Cantilena
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-04

7.  QT and Tpeak-Tend intervals in shift workers.

Authors:  Ioana Mozos; Liliana Filimon
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.438

8.  Universal Correction for QT/RR Hysteresis.

Authors:  Marek Malik; Lars Johannesen; Katerina Hnatkova; Norman Stockbridge
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Beat-to-beat vectorcardiographic analysis of ventricular depolarization and repolarization in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Muhammad A Hasan; Derek Abbott; Mathias Baumert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Detection of T Wave Peak for Serial Comparisons of JTp Interval.

Authors:  Katerina Hnatkova; Jose Vicente; Lars Johannesen; Christine Garnett; David G Strauss; Norman Stockbridge; Marek Malik
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  3 in total

1.  Examination of New Electrocardiographic Repolarization Markers in Diabetic Patients with Noncritical Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Müjgan Gürler; Mehmet İnanır
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.149

2.  Demographic and Methodological Heterogeneity in Electrocardiogram Signals From Guinea Pigs.

Authors:  Kazi T Haq; Blake L Cooper; Fiona Berk; Anysja Roberts; Luther M Swift; Nikki Gillum Posnack
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Sex and Rate Change Differences in QT/RR Hysteresis in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Irena Andršová; Katerina Hnatkova; Martina Šišáková; Ondřej Toman; Peter Smetana; Katharina M Huster; Petra Barthel; Tomáš Novotný; Georg Schmidt; Marek Malik
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.