Literature DB >> 33384579

Deep Neural Network Model of Hearing-Impaired Speech-in-Noise Perception.

Stephanie Haro1,2, Christopher J Smalt1, Gregory A Ciccarelli1, Thomas F Quatieri1,2.   

Abstract

Many individuals struggle to understand speech in listening scenarios that include reverberation and background noise. An individual's ability to understand speech arises from a combination of peripheral auditory function, central auditory function, and general cognitive abilities. The interaction of these factors complicates the prescription of treatment or therapy to improve hearing function. Damage to the auditory periphery can be studied in animals; however, this method alone is not enough to understand the impact of hearing loss on speech perception. Computational auditory models bridge the gap between animal studies and human speech perception. Perturbations to the modeled auditory systems can permit mechanism-based investigations into observed human behavior. In this study, we propose a computational model that accounts for the complex interactions between different hearing damage mechanisms and simulates human speech-in-noise perception. The model performs a digit classification task as a human would, with only acoustic sound pressure as input. Thus, we can use the model's performance as a proxy for human performance. This two-stage model consists of a biophysical cochlear-nerve spike generator followed by a deep neural network (DNN) classifier. We hypothesize that sudden damage to the periphery affects speech perception and that central nervous system adaptation over time may compensate for peripheral hearing damage. Our model achieved human-like performance across signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) under normal-hearing (NH) cochlear settings, achieving 50% digit recognition accuracy at -20.7 dB SNR. Results were comparable to eight NH participants on the same task who achieved 50% behavioral performance at -22 dB SNR. We also simulated medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) and auditory nerve fiber (ANF) loss, which worsened digit-recognition accuracy at lower SNRs compared to higher SNRs. Our simulated performance following ANF loss is consistent with the hypothesis that cochlear synaptopathy impacts communication in background noise more so than in quiet. Following the insult of various cochlear degradations, we implemented extreme and conservative adaptation through the DNN. At the lowest SNRs (<0 dB), both adapted models were unable to fully recover NH performance, even with hundreds of thousands of training samples. This implies a limit on performance recovery following peripheral damage in our human-inspired DNN architecture.
Copyright © 2020 Haro, Smalt, Ciccarelli and Quatieri.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear modeling; cochlear synapatopathy; deep neural network (DNN); medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents; speech-in-noise (SIN)

Year:  2020        PMID: 33384579      PMCID: PMC7770113          DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.588448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-453X            Impact factor:   4.677


  46 in total

1.  Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Ken W Grant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectro-temporal modulation transfer function of single voxels in the human auditory cortex measured with high-resolution fMRI.

Authors:  Marc Schönwiesner; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Hidden Hearing Injury: The Emerging Science and Military Relevance of Cochlear Synaptopathy.

Authors:  Victoria Tepe; Christopher Smalt; Jeremy Nelson; Thomas Quatieri; Kenneth Pitts
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Audiomotor Perceptual Training Enhances Speech Intelligibility in Background Noise.

Authors:  Jonathon P Whitton; Kenneth E Hancock; Jeffrey M Shannon; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Noise-induced hearing loss: Translating risk from animal models to real-world environments.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Tanisha L Hammill; William J Murphy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-15

8.  The relationship of speech intelligibility with hearing sensitivity, cognition, and perceived hearing difficulties varies for different speech perception tests.

Authors:  Antje Heinrich; Helen Henshaw; Melanie A Ferguson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-16

9.  Reference-Free Assessment of Speech Intelligibility Using Bispectrum of an Auditory Neurogram.

Authors:  Mohammad E Hossain; Wissam A Jassim; Muhammad S A Zilany
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A dynamic network model of temporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Monzilur Rahman; Ben D B Willmore; Andrew J King; Nicol S Harper
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  2 in total

1.  The impairment of speech perception in noise following pure tone hearing recovery in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Tongxiang Diao; Maoli Duan; Xin Ma; Jinjun Liu; Lisheng Yu; Yuanyuan Jing; Mengyuan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  The hunt for hidden hearing loss in humans: From preclinical studies to effective interventions.

Authors:  Joaquin T Valderrama; Angel de la Torre; David McAlpine
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 5.152

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.