Literature DB >> 33384446

Swedish intrauterine growth reference ranges of biometric measurements of fetal head, abdomen and femur.

Linda Lindström1, Mårten Ageheim2, Ove Axelsson2,3, Laith Hussain-Alkhateeb4, Alkistis Skalkidou2, Eva Bergman2.   

Abstract

Ultrasonic assessment of fetal growth is an important part of obstetric care to prevent adverse pregnancy outcome. However, lack of reliable reference ranges is a major barrier for accurate interpretation of the examinations. The aim of this study was to create updated Swedish national reference ranges for intrauterine size and growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur from gestational week 12 to 42. This prospective longitudinal multicentre study included 583 healthy pregnant women with low risk of aberrant fetal growth. Each woman was examined up to five times with ultrasound from gestational week 12 + 3 to 41 + 6. The assessed intrauterine fetal biometric measurements were biparietal diameter (outer-inner), head circumference, mean abdominal diameter, abdominal circumference and femur length. A two-level hierarchical regression model was employed to account for the individual measurements of the fetus and the number of repeated visits for measurements while accounting for the random effect of the identified parameterization of gestational age. The expected median and variance, expressed in both standard deviations and percentiles, for each individual biometric measurement was calculated. The presented national reference ranges can be used for assessment of intrauterine size and growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur in the second and third trimester of pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33384446      PMCID: PMC7775468          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79797-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  32 in total

1.  Longitudinal reference ranges for estimated fetal weight.

Authors:  Synnøve Lian Johnsen; Svein Rasmussen; Tom Wilsgaard; Rita Sollien; Torvid Kiserud
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 2.  Pregnancy dating by fetal crown-rump length: a systematic review of charts.

Authors:  R Napolitano; J Dhami; E O Ohuma; C Ioannou; A Conde-Agudelo; S H Kennedy; J Villar; A T Papageorghiou
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Are selection criteria for healthy pregnancies responsible for the gap between fetal growth in the French national Elfe birth cohort and the Intergrowth-21st fetal growth standards?

Authors:  Barbara Heude; Morgane Le Guern; Anne Forhan; Pauline Scherdel; Manik Kadawathagedara; Marie-Noëlle Dufourg; Corinne Bois; Marie Cheminat; François Goffinet; Jérémie Botton; Marie-Aline Charles; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Effects of applying universal fetal growth standards in a Scandinavian multi-ethnic population.

Authors:  Line Sletner; Torvid Kiserud; Siri Vangen; Britt Nakstad; Anne K Jenum
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Birth-weight differences at term are explained by placental dysfunction and not by maternal ethnicity.

Authors:  J Morales-Roselló; T Dias; A Khalil; V Fornes-Ferrer; R Ciammella; L Gimenez-Roca; A Perales-Marín; B Thilaganathan
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 6.  Systematic misclassification of gestational age by ultrasound biometry: implications for clinical practice and research methodology in the Nordic countries.

Authors:  Alkistis Skalkidou; Merit Kullinger; Marios K Georgakis; Helle Kieler; Ulrik S Kesmodel
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts.

Authors:  K H Nicolaides; D Wright; A Syngelaki; A Wright; R Akolekar
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  Influence of maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy on fetal and childhood growth.

Authors:  R L Naeye
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth.

Authors:  William J Kierans; K S Joseph; Zhong-Cheng Luo; Robert Platt; Russell Wilkins; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Design and other methodological considerations for the construction of human fetal and neonatal size and growth charts.

Authors:  Eric O Ohuma; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  2 in total

1.  Swedish intrauterine growth reference ranges for estimated fetal weight.

Authors:  Linda Lindström; Mårten Ageheim; Ove Axelsson; Laith Hussain-Alkhateeb; Alkistis Skalkidou; Anna-Karin Wikström; Eva Bergman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Targeted newborn metabolomics: prediction of gestational age from cord blood.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Jasper; Scott P Oltman; Elizabeth E Rogers; John M Dagle; Jeffrey C Murray; Moses Kamya; Abel Kakuru; Richard Kajubi; Teddy Ochieng; Harriet Adrama; Martin Okitwi; Peter Olwoch; Prasanna Jagannathan; Tamara D Clark; Grant Dorsey; Theodore Ruel; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Kelli K Ryckman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.225

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.