Literature DB >> 33383941

Risks in Management of Enteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Units: A Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Magdalena Hoffmann1,2,3, Christine Maria Schwarz2, Stefan Fürst4, Christina Starchl3, Elisabeth Lobmeyr5, Gerald Sendlhofer1,2, Marie-Madlen Jeitziner6.   

Abstract

Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) have a high risk of developing malnutrition, and this is associated with poorer clinical outcomes. In clinical practice, nutrition, including enteral nutrition (EN), is often not prioritized. Resulting from this, risks and safety issues for patients and healthcare professionals can emerge. The aim of this literature review, inspired by the Rapid Review Guidebook by Dobbins, 2017, was to identify risks and safety issues for patient safety in the management of EN in critically ill patients in the ICU. Three databases were used to identify studies between 2009 and 2020. We assessed 3495 studies for eligibility and included 62 in our narrative synthesis. Several risks and problems were identified: No use of clinical assessment or screening nutrition assessment, inadequate tube management, missing energy target, missing a nutritionist, bad hygiene and handling, wrong time management and speed, nutritional interruptions, wrong body position, gastrointestinal complication and infections, missing or not using guidelines, understaffing, and lack of education. Raising awareness of these risks is a central aspect in patient safety in ICU. Clinical experts can use a checklist with 12 identified top risks and the recommendations drawn up to carry out their own risk analysis in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  enteral nutrition; intensive care unit; patient safety; quality; risk management

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33383941      PMCID: PMC7823864          DOI: 10.3390/nu13010082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrients        ISSN: 2072-6643            Impact factor:   5.717


  71 in total

1.  Web-based teaching module improves success rates of postpyloric positioning of nasoenteric feeding tubes.

Authors:  Jessica M Lee; Forrest Fernandez; Ilene Staff; John W Mah
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Impact of enteral feeding protocols on enteral nutrition delivery: results of a multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Daren K Heyland; Naomi E Cahill; Rupinder Dhaliwal; Xiaoqun Sun; Andrew G Day; Stephen A McClave
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Prevalence, risk factors, clinical consequences, and treatment of enteral feed intolerance during critical illness.

Authors:  Usha Gungabissoon; Kimberley Hacquoil; Chanchal Bains; Michael Irizarry; George Dukes; Russell Williamson; Adam M Deane; Daren K Heyland
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 4.  An integrated systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials evaluating nasogastric against postpyloris (nasoduodenal and nasojejunal) feeding in critically ill patients admitted in intensive care unit.

Authors:  M S Sajid; A Harper; Q Hussain; L Forni; K K Singh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.

Authors:  Martin A Makary; Michael Daniel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-05-03

6.  Use of Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (NUTRIC) Scoring System for Nutrition Risk Assessment and Prognosis Prediction in Critically Ill Neurological Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Yi Bian; Zhouping Tang; Furong Wang
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Do we really know how much we are feeding our patients?

Authors:  Susan Gonya; Michael Baram
Journal:  Hosp Pract (1995)       Date:  2015-11-23

8.  ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Pierre Singer; Annika Reintam Blaser; Mette M Berger; Waleed Alhazzani; Philip C Calder; Michael P Casaer; Michael Hiesmayr; Konstantin Mayer; Juan Carlos Montejo; Claude Pichard; Jean-Charles Preiser; Arthur R H van Zanten; Simon Oczkowski; Wojciech Szczeklik; Stephan C Bischoff
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 7.324

9.  Bedside electromagnetic-guided placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes among critically Ill patients: A single-centre randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xuejin Gao; Li Zhang; Jie Zhao; Feng Tian; Haifeng Sun; Peng Wang; Jiwei Wang; Zhiming Wang; Xinying Wang
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.425

10.  Semi-automated ultrasound guidance applied to nasogastrojejunal tube replacement for enteral nutrition in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Ying Li; Yu Ye; Yang Mei; Haiying Ruan; Yuan Yu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  1 in total

1.  Healthcare Resource Utilization and Cost Comparisons of High-Protein Enteral Nutrition Formulas Used in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Matthew C Bozeman; Laura L Schott; Amarsinh M Desai; Mary K Miranowski; Dorothy L Baumer; Cynthia C Lowen; Zhun Cao; Krysmaru Araujo Torres
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-07-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.