Laura B Nellums1, Jaynaide Powis2, Lucy Jones3, Anna Miller3, Kieran Rustage4, Neal Russell4, Jon S Friedland4, Sally Hargreaves5. 1. Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Hucknall Road, NG5 1PB, UK; Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, SW17 0RE, UK. Electronic address: laura.nellums@nottingham.ac.uk. 2. Infectious Diseases & Immunity, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 ONN, UK. 3. Doctors of the World UK (Médecins du Monde), 29th Floor, One Canada Square, London, E14 5AA, UK. 4. Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, SW17 0RE, UK. 5. Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, SW17 0RE, UK. Electronic address: s.hargreaves@sgul.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Undocumented migrant women experience complex barriers to maternity services, are less likely to receive the recommended level of maternity care, and have poorer obstetric outcomes than non-migrant women. There are concerns increasing restrictions on entitlement to health services have a detrimental impact on access to services and obstetric outcomes, particularly among undocumented migrant women. The study aimed to investigate the experiences of undocumented migrant women who have been pregnant in England, and factors affecting access to care and health outcomes. METHODS: We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews June-December 2017 with a purposive sample of migrant women born outside the UK (aged>18) who had experiences of pregnancy and undocumented status (without permission to reside) in the UK, recruited through Doctors of the World (DOTW) UK. Interpreting services were used on request. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis. Ethical approval: Imperial College London Research Ethics Committee (ICREC reference: 17IC3924). RESULTS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants, 10 of whom had their first antenatal appointment after the national target of 13 weeks, and nine of whom reported complications. Themes defining women's experiences of pregnancy included: restricted agency, intersecting stressors, and an ongoing cycle of precarity, defined by legal status, social isolation, and economic status. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new evidence of women's experiences of pregnancy in the UK in the context of increasingly restrictive health policies including charging and data sharing. Six recommendations are made to ensure the UK and other migrant receiving countries work towards reducing inequalities and achieving national and global targets for maternal and child health and universal health coverage.
BACKGROUND: Undocumented migrant women experience complex barriers to maternity services, are less likely to receive the recommended level of maternity care, and have poorer obstetric outcomes than non-migrant women. There are concerns increasing restrictions on entitlement to health services have a detrimental impact on access to services and obstetric outcomes, particularly among undocumented migrant women. The study aimed to investigate the experiences of undocumented migrant women who have been pregnant in England, and factors affecting access to care and health outcomes. METHODS: We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews June-December 2017 with a purposive sample of migrant women born outside the UK (aged>18) who had experiences of pregnancy and undocumented status (without permission to reside) in the UK, recruited through Doctors of the World (DOTW) UK. Interpreting services were used on request. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis. Ethical approval: Imperial College London Research Ethics Committee (ICREC reference: 17IC3924). RESULTS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants, 10 of whom had their first antenatal appointment after the national target of 13 weeks, and nine of whom reported complications. Themes defining women's experiences of pregnancy included: restricted agency, intersecting stressors, and an ongoing cycle of precarity, defined by legal status, social isolation, and economic status. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new evidence of women's experiences of pregnancy in the UK in the context of increasingly restrictive health policies including charging and data sharing. Six recommendations are made to ensure the UK and other migrant receiving countries work towards reducing inequalities and achieving national and global targets for maternal and child health and universal health coverage.
Authors: Shoba Poduval; Natasha Howard; Lucy Jones; Phil Murwill; Martin McKee; Helena Legido-Quigley Journal: Int J Health Serv Date: 2015-02-21 Impact factor: 1.663
Authors: Neal James Russell; Lisa Murphy; Laura Nellums; Jonathan Broad; Sarah Boutros; Nando Sigona; Delan Devakumar Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Annika Wendland; Boje K Ehmsen; Vibeke Lenskjold; Birgitte S Astrup; Marlene Mohr; Christopher J Williams; Susan A Cowan Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Raquel Bosó Pérez; David Reid; Karen J Maxwell; Jo Gibbs; Emily Dema; Christopher Bonell; Catherine H Mercer; Pam Sonnenberg; Nigel Field; Kirstin R Mitchell Journal: BMJ Sex Reprod Health Date: 2022-04-20