Literature DB >> 33382829

Application of machine learning in the diagnosis of gastric cancer based on noninvasive characteristics.

Shuang-Li Zhu1, Jie Dong2, Chenjing Zhang2, Yao-Bo Huang3, Wensheng Pan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of gastric cancer mainly relies on endoscopy, which is invasive and costly. The aim of this study is to develop a predictive model for the diagnosis of gastric cancer based on noninvasive characteristics. AIMS: To construct a predictive model for the diagnosis of gastric cancer with high accuracy based on noninvasive characteristics.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 709 patients at Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital was conducted. Variables of age, gender, blood cell count, liver function, kidney function, blood lipids, tumor markers and pathological results were analyzed. We used gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), a type of machine learning method, to construct a predictive model for the diagnosis of gastric cancer and evaluate the accuracy of the model.
RESULTS: Of the 709 patients, 398 were diagnosed with gastric cancer; 311 were health people or diagnosed with benign gastric disease. Multivariate analysis showed that gender, age, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, hemoglobin, albumin, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) were independent characteristics associated with gastric cancer. We constructed a predictive model using GBDT, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the model was 91%. For the test dataset, sensitivity was 87.0% and specificity 84.1% at the optimal threshold value of 0.56. The overall accuracy was 83.0%. Positive and negative predictive values were 83.0% and 87.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: We construct a predictive model to diagnose gastric cancer with high sensitivity and specificity. The model is noninvasive and may reduce the medical cost.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33382829      PMCID: PMC7775073          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  21 in total

1.  Plasma proteomics-based identification of novel biomarkers in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Bin Zhou; Zhe Zhou; Yuling Chen; Haiteng Deng; Yunlong Cai; Xiaolong Rao; Yuxin Yin; Long Rong
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.281

2.  Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in Reducing Gastric Cancer Mortality.

Authors:  Jae Kwan Jun; Kui Son Choi; Hoo-Yeon Lee; Mina Suh; Boyoung Park; Seung Hoon Song; Kyu Won Jung; Chan Wha Lee; Il Ju Choi; Eun-Cheol Park; Dukhyoung Lee
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Efficient automated detection of mitotic cells from breast histological images using deep convolution neutral network with wavelet decomposed patches.

Authors:  Dev Kumar Das; Pranab Kumar Dutta
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  [Clinical value of serum CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 and CA242 in the diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer].

Authors:  Yu-bing Zhu; Shao-hua Ge; Lian-hai Zhang; Xiao-hong Wang; Xiao-fang Xing; Hong DU; Ying Hu; Ying-ai Li; Yong-ning Jia; Yi Lin; Biao Fan; Jia-fu Ji
Journal:  Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2012-02

5.  [Report of cancer epidemiology in China, 2015].

Authors:  R S Zheng; K X Sun; S W Zhang; H M Zeng; X N Zou; R Chen; X Y Gu; W W Wei; J He
Journal:  Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi       Date:  2019-01-23

6.  Early Colorectal Cancer Detected by Machine Learning Model Using Gender, Age, and Complete Blood Count Data.

Authors:  Mark C Hornbrook; Ran Goshen; Eran Choman; Maureen O'Keeffe-Rosetti; Yaron Kinar; Elizabeth G Liles; Kristal C Rust
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Diagnostic value of CYFRA 21-1, CEA, CA 19-9, CA 15-3, and CA 125 assays in pleural effusions: analysis of 116 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  David Shitrit; Boris Zingerman; Ariella Bar-Gil Shitrit; Dekel Shlomi; Mordechai R Kramer
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2005-08

8.  Cancer statistics in China, 2015.

Authors:  Wanqing Chen; Rongshou Zheng; Peter D Baade; Siwei Zhang; Hongmei Zeng; Freddie Bray; Ahmedin Jemal; Xue Qin Yu; Jie He
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Circulating MicroRNA-21 Is a Potential Diagnostic Biomarker in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jianhong Wu; Guangxin Li; Zeyou Wang; Yongliang Yao; Rui Chen; XiongYong Pu; Jianjun Wang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 3.434

10.  Clinical significance and diagnostic value of serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yao Liang; Wei Wang; Cheng Fang; Seeruttun Sharvesh Raj; Wan-Ming Hu; Qi-Wen Li; Zhi-Wei Zhou
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-02
View more
  10 in total

1.  Neuroprotection of sevoflurane against ischemia/reperfusion-induced brain injury through inhibiting GluN2A/GluN2B-PSD-95-MLK3 module.

Authors:  Lei Jin; Xiu Mei Bo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Development and performance assessment of novel machine learning models to predict pneumonia after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Chaojin Chen; Dong Yang; Shilong Gao; Yihan Zhang; Liubing Chen; Bohan Wang; Zihan Mo; Yang Yang; Ziqing Hei; Shaoli Zhou
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 3.  Machine Learning for Future Subtyping of the Tumor Microenvironment of Gastro-Esophageal Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Sebastian Klein; Dan G Duda
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Development of web-based dynamic nomogram to predict survival in patients with gastric cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Atefeh Talebi; Nasrin Borumandnia; Hassan Doosti; Somayeh Abbasi; Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Shahram Agah; Seidamir Pasha Tabaeian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Based on multiple machine learning to identify the ENO2 as diagnosis biomarkers of glaucoma.

Authors:  Min Dai; Zhulin Hu; Zefeng Kang; Zhikun Zheng
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Evaluation of CSTB and DMBT1 expression in saliva of gastric cancer patients and controls.

Authors:  Maryam Koopaie; Marjan Ghafourian; Soheila Manifar; Shima Younespour; Mansour Davoudi; Sajad Kolahdooz; Mohammad Shirkhoda
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Machine learning: A non-invasive prediction method for gastric cancer based on a survey of lifestyle behaviors.

Authors:  Siqing Jiang; Haojun Gao; Jiajin He; Jiaqi Shi; Yuling Tong; Jian Wu
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-08-16

8.  Comparing machine learning algorithms to predict 5-year survival in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mostafa Shanbehzadeh; Mohammad Reza Afrash; Nader Mirani; Hadi Kazemi-Arpanahi
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.298

9.  Design and Development of an Intelligent System for Predicting 5-Year Survival in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Afrash; Mostafa Shanbehzadeh; Hadi Kazemi-Arpanahi
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2022-08-22

10.  Machine Learning on Early Diagnosis of Depression.

Authors:  Kwang-Sig Lee; Byung-Joo Ham
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.202

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.