Ayse B Dincer1, Joseph D Janizek1,2, Su-In Lee1. 1. Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. 2. Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Increasing number of gene expression profiles has enabled the use of complex models, such as deep unsupervised neural networks, to extract a latent space from these profiles. However, expression profiles, especially when collected in large numbers, inherently contain variations introduced by technical artifacts (e.g. batch effects) and uninteresting biological variables (e.g. age) in addition to the true signals of interest. These sources of variations, called confounders, produce embeddings that fail to transfer to different domains, i.e. an embedding learned from one dataset with a specific confounder distribution does not generalize to different distributions. To remedy this problem, we attempt to disentangle confounders from true signals to generate biologically informative embeddings. RESULTS: In this article, we introduce the Adversarial Deconfounding AutoEncoder (AD-AE) approach to deconfounding gene expression latent spaces. The AD-AE model consists of two neural networks: (i) an autoencoder to generate an embedding that can reconstruct original measurements, and (ii) an adversary trained to predict the confounder from that embedding. We jointly train the networks to generate embeddings that can encode as much information as possible without encoding any confounding signal. By applying AD-AE to two distinct gene expression datasets, we show that our model can (i) generate embeddings that do not encode confounder information, (ii) conserve the biological signals present in the original space and (iii) generalize successfully across different confounder domains. We demonstrate that AD-AE outperforms standard autoencoder and other deconfounding approaches. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our code and data are available at https://gitlab.cs.washington.edu/abdincer/ad-ae. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: Increasing number of gene expression profiles has enabled the use of complex models, such as deep unsupervised neural networks, to extract a latent space from these profiles. However, expression profiles, especially when collected in large numbers, inherently contain variations introduced by technical artifacts (e.g. batch effects) and uninteresting biological variables (e.g. age) in addition to the true signals of interest. These sources of variations, called confounders, produce embeddings that fail to transfer to different domains, i.e. an embedding learned from one dataset with a specific confounder distribution does not generalize to different distributions. To remedy this problem, we attempt to disentangle confounders from true signals to generate biologically informative embeddings. RESULTS: In this article, we introduce the Adversarial Deconfounding AutoEncoder (AD-AE) approach to deconfounding gene expression latent spaces. The AD-AE model consists of two neural networks: (i) an autoencoder to generate an embedding that can reconstruct original measurements, and (ii) an adversary trained to predict the confounder from that embedding. We jointly train the networks to generate embeddings that can encode as much information as possible without encoding any confounding signal. By applying AD-AE to two distinct gene expression datasets, we show that our model can (i) generate embeddings that do not encode confounder information, (ii) conserve the biological signals present in the original space and (iii) generalize successfully across different confounder domains. We demonstrate that AD-AE outperforms standard autoencoder and other deconfounding approaches. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our code and data are available at https://gitlab.cs.washington.edu/abdincer/ad-ae. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Monica Benito; Joel Parker; Quan Du; Junyuan Wu; Dong Xiang; Charles M Perou; J S Marron Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Cameron W Brennan; Roel G W Verhaak; Aaron McKenna; Benito Campos; Houtan Noushmehr; Sofie R Salama; Siyuan Zheng; Debyani Chakravarty; J Zachary Sanborn; Samuel H Berman; Rameen Beroukhim; Brady Bernard; Chang-Jiun Wu; Giannicola Genovese; Ilya Shmulevich; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Lihua Zou; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Sachet A Shukla; Giovanni Ciriello; W K Yung; Wei Zhang; Carrie Sougnez; Tom Mikkelsen; Kenneth Aldape; Darell D Bigner; Erwin G Van Meir; Michael Prados; Andrew Sloan; Keith L Black; Jennifer Eschbacher; Gaetano Finocchiaro; William Friedman; David W Andrews; Abhijit Guha; Mary Iacocca; Brian P O'Neill; Greg Foltz; Jerome Myers; Daniel J Weisenberger; Robert Penny; Raju Kucherlapati; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes; Richard Gibbs; Marco Marra; Gordon B Mills; Eric Lander; Paul Spellman; Richard Wilson; Chris Sander; John Weinstein; Matthew Meyerson; Stacey Gabriel; Peter W Laird; David Haussler; Gad Getz; Lynda Chin Journal: Cell Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Cosmin Lazar; Stijn Meganck; Jonatan Taminau; David Steenhoff; Alain Coletta; Colin Molter; David Y Weiss-Solís; Robin Duque; Hugues Bersini; Ann Nowé Journal: Brief Bioinform Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 11.622
Authors: Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Nehme El-Hachem; Nicolai Juul Birkbak; Andrew C Jin; Andrew H Beck; Hugo J W L Aerts; John Quackenbush Journal: Nature Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Kerby Shedden; Jeremy M G Taylor; Steven A Enkemann; Ming-Sound Tsao; Timothy J Yeatman; William L Gerald; Steven Eschrich; Igor Jurisica; Thomas J Giordano; David E Misek; Andrew C Chang; Chang Qi Zhu; Daniel Strumpf; Samir Hanash; Frances A Shepherd; Keyue Ding; Lesley Seymour; Katsuhiko Naoki; Nathan Pennell; Barbara Weir; Roel Verhaak; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Todd Golub; Michael Gruidl; Anupama Sharma; Janos Szoke; Maureen Zakowski; Valerie Rusch; Mark Kris; Agnes Viale; Noriko Motoi; William Travis; Barbara Conley; Venkatraman E Seshan; Matthew Meyerson; Rork Kuick; Kevin K Dobbin; Tracy Lively; James W Jacobson; David G Beer Journal: Nat Med Date: 2008-07-20 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Emad A Rakha; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Frederick Baehner; David J Dabbs; Thomas Decker; Vincenzo Eusebi; Stephen B Fox; Shu Ichihara; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Sunil R Lakhani; José Palacios; Andrea L Richardson; Stuart J Schnitt; Fernando C Schmitt; Puay-Hoon Tan; Gary M Tse; Sunil Badve; Ian O Ellis Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-07-30 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Kristina Preuer; Richard P I Lewis; Sepp Hochreiter; Andreas Bender; Krishna C Bulusu; Günter Klambauer Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 6.937