Literature DB >> 33380957

Chloroprocaine Provides Safe, Effective, Short-Acting Spinal Anesthesia Ideal for Ambulatory Surgeries: A Retrospective Review.

David H Kim1,2, Richard Kahn1,2, Andrew Lee1,2, Phuong Dinh Mac1, Yu-Fen Chiu1, Jacques Yadeau1,2, Jiabin Liu1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ideal local anesthetic for use in ambulatory spinal anesthesia is safe, with minimal adverse effects, and of a duration that does not impede post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge. Since its approval for use in spinal anesthesia in Europe in 2012, chloroprocaine has seen a resurgence. Recent studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of preservative-free chloroprocaine for use in spinal anesthesia, but few provide the incidence of adverse events such as urinary retention and transient neurologic symptoms. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to assess the safety of chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia, including the incidence of adverse events and the duration and quality of its use, in the initial 6 months of its use at our institution. We hypothesized that chloroprocaine would provide effective spinal anesthesia for orthopedic cases of short duration, with a low rate of complications.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients from June to December 2016 at our institution who had ambulatory knee arthroscopy or foot procedures in which chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia was used. For all 445 charts analyzed, data were collected on anesthesia characteristics, office visits, nursing PACU assessment, and nursing post-operative day 1 follow-up phone calls.
RESULTS: The median chloroprocaine dosage was 44 mg (interquartile range [IQR], 40 to 50). The median duration of sensory block was 156 min (IQR, 128 to 189) and of motor block was 148 min (IQR, 123 to 181). Time to ambulation was 186 min (IQR, 158 to 218) and time to meeting of discharge criteria was 218 min (IQR, 189 to 250). The most common adverse events in the PACU were bradycardia and hypotension. No patients had urinary retention or transient neurologic symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: In 6 months of use at our institution, chloroprocaine provided safe and effective spinal anesthesia for short orthopedic procedures, with no incidence of transient neurologic symptoms, neuropraxia, or urinary retention. © Hospital for Special Surgery 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory surgery; chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia; transient neurologic symptoms; urinary retention

Year:  2019        PMID: 33380957      PMCID: PMC7749923          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-019-09713-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  16 in total

1.  The incidence of transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with mepivacaine.

Authors:  Jacques T YaDeau; Gregory A Liguori; Victor M Zayas
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Outpatients do not need to void after short neuraxial blocks.

Authors:  Michael F Mulroy
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Spinal 1% 2-Chloroprocaine versus general anesthesia for ultra-short outpatient procedures: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Camponovo
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2014-12-17

4.  Does spinal chloroprocaine pharmacokinetic profile actually translate into a clinical advantage in terms of clinical outcomes when compared to low-dose spinal bupivacaine? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Saporito; Marcello Ceppi; Andreas Perren; Davide La Regina; Stefano Cafarotti; Alain Borgeat; José Aguirre; Marc Van De Velde; An Teunkens
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 9.452

5.  Comparison of bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia for outpatient surgery: a double-blind randomized trial.

Authors:  Marie-Andrée Lacasse; Jean-Denis Roy; Josée Forget; Franck Vandenbroucke; Robert F Seal; Danielle Beaulieu; Michael McCormack; Luc Massicotte
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Using chloroprocaine for spinal anaesthesia in outpatient knee-arthroscopy results in earlier discharge and improved operating room efficiency compared to mepivacaine and prilocaine.

Authors:  Volker Gebhardt; Sebastian Hausen; Christel Weiss; Marc D Schmittner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Spinal 2-chloroprocaine for surgery: an initial 10-month experience.

Authors:  Jessica R Yoos; Dan J Kopacz
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Comparison of 2-Chloroprocaine, Bupivacaine, and Lidocaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy in an Outpatient Setting: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  An Teunkens; Kristien Vermeulen; Elke Van Gerven; Steffen Fieuws; Marc Van de Velde; Steffen Rex
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.288

9.  Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: a comparison with lidocaine in volunteers.

Authors:  Mary E Kouri; Dan J Kopacz
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Ambulatory surgery patients may be discharged before voiding after short-acting spinal and epidural anesthesia.

Authors:  Michael F Mulroy; Francis V Salinas; Kathleen L Larkin; Nayak L Polissar
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.