Literature DB >> 27281722

Comparison of 2-Chloroprocaine, Bupivacaine, and Lidocaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy in an Outpatient Setting: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

An Teunkens1, Kristien Vermeulen, Elke Van Gerven, Steffen Fieuws, Marc Van de Velde, Steffen Rex.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Knee arthroscopy is a well-established procedure in day-case surgery, which is frequently performed under spinal anesthesia. It is, however, controversial whether the choice for a specific local anesthetic translates into relevant outcomes. We hypothesized that the use of 2-chloroprocaine would be associated with a faster recovery from sensorimotor block.
METHODS: Ninety-nine patients were included in this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial and randomly allocated to receive either 40 mg 2-chloroprocaine, 40 mg lidocaine, or 7.5 mg bupivacaine. The primary endpoint was the time until complete recovery of sensory block. Secondary endpoints included time to recovery from motor block, failure rates, incidence of hypotension/bradycardia, postoperative pain, first mobilization, voiding and discharge times, and the incidence of transient neurologic symptoms. This clinical trial was registered prior to patient enrollment (EudraCT 2011-003675-11).
RESULTS: Patients in the chloroprocaine group had a significantly shorter time until recovery from sensory block (median, 2.6 hours; interquartile range [IQR], 2.2-2.9 hours) than patients in the lidocaine group (3.1 hours; IQR, 2.7-3.6 hours; P < 0.006) and in the bupivacaine group (6.1 hours; IQR, 5.5 hours to undefined hours; P < 0.0001). Chloroprocaine was associated with a significantly faster recovery from motor block than lidocaine and bupivacaine. Times to first mobilization, voiding, and discharge were significantly shorter for chloroprocaine when compared with bupivacaine, but not with lidocaine. In the bupivacaine group, patients needed significantly less rescue medication for postoperative pain when compared with lidocaine and chloroprocaine. Groups did not differ with respect to patient satisfaction, incidence of bradycardia/hypotension, and transient neurologic symptom rate.
CONCLUSIONS: For spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing ambulatory knee arthroscopy, chloroprocaine has the shortest time to complete recovery of sensory and motor block compared with bupivacaine and lidocaine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27281722     DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of spinal anaesthesia with isobaric chloroprocaine and general anaesthesia for short duration ambulatory urological procedures.

Authors:  Siddarth Ravi; Handattu M Krishna
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-10

2.  Chloroprocaine Provides Safe, Effective, Short-Acting Spinal Anesthesia Ideal for Ambulatory Surgeries: A Retrospective Review.

Authors:  David H Kim; Richard Kahn; Andrew Lee; Phuong Dinh Mac; Yu-Fen Chiu; Jacques Yadeau; Jiabin Liu
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-08-26

3.  Spinal Anesthesia Using Chloroprocaine is Safe, Effective, and Facilitates Earlier Discharge in Selected Fast-track Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Carl L Herndon; Roxana Martinez; Nana O Sarpong; Jeffrey A Geller; Roshan P Shah; H John Cooper
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-06-01

4.  In vitro and in vivo quantification of chloroprocaine release from an implantable device in a piglet postoperative pain model.

Authors:  Simona De Gregori; Manuela De Gregori; Nora Bloise; Dario Bugada; Mariadelfina Molinaro; Claudia Filisetti; Massimo Allegri; Michael E Schatman; Lorenzo Cobianchi
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Lidocaine vs. Other Local Anesthetics in the Development of Transient Neurologic Symptoms (TNS) Following Spinal Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Chang-Hoon Koo; Hyun-Jung Shin; Sung-Hee Han; Jung-Hee Ryu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Transient neurological symptoms (TNS) following spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anaesthetics in adult surgical patients: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrice Forget; Josip A Borovac; Elizabeth M Thackeray; Nathan L Pace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-01

7.  Alternative topical anesthesia for bronchoscopy in a case of severe lidocaine allergy.

Authors:  Matthew Hensley; Benjamin H Singer
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2018-01-03

8.  Efficacy of procaine combined with ketamine and propofol in pediatric epidural anesthesia.

Authors:  Hai Huang; Yujie Liu; Zijun Gao; Xucai Wu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Impact of Chloroprocaine on the Eligibility for Hospital Discharge in Patients Requiring Ambulatory Surgery Under Spinal Anesthesia: An Observational Multicenter Prospective Study.

Authors:  Xavier Capdevila; Christophe Aveline; Laurent Delaunay; Hervé Bouaziz; Paul Zetlaoui; Olivier Choquet; Laurent Jouffroy; Hélène Herman-Demars; Francis Bonnet
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Factors Determining the Choice of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: Results of a Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Xavier Capdevila; Christophe Aveline; Laurent Delaunay; Hervé Bouaziz; Paul Zetlaoui; Olivier Choquet; Laurent Jouffroy; Hélène Herman-Demars; Francis Bonnet
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.