Literature DB >> 3338023

Large acinar atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma of the prostate.

J Kovi1, F K Mostofi, M Y Heshmat, J P Enterline.   

Abstract

Step-sections of 429 whole prostate glands were studied. Large acinar atypical hyperplasia was graded as mild, moderate, and severe based on the degree of cellular anaplasia. The relationship between atypical hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma was investigated. There was a strong association between prevalence and grade of atypical hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma in patients up to 60 years old. Beyond the age of 60 no association was detected. In the younger age groups (36 to 60 years) atypical hyperplasia was found in 86.8% of prostates with carcinoma, but only in 37.9% of benign glands. Corresponding figures for the over-60 age group were 68.8% and 65.1%, respectively. A biologic explanation of the association between atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma in the younger age groups has been proposed. It was suggested that these men with atypical hyperplasia, particularly with severe atypical hyperplasia, have a greater risk for developing prostatic carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3338023     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880201)61:3<555::aid-cncr2820610322>3.0.co;2-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  8 in total

1.  Is repeat biopsy for isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia necessary?

Authors:  Arnold I Chin; Dhiren S Dave; Jacob Rajfer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

2.  Intraprostatic ethanol diffusion: comparison of two injection methods using ex vivo human prostates.

Authors:  B J King; T K Mann-Gow; M Kida; M K Plante; S D Perrapato; P Zvara
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 3.  Precursor lesions for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M R Feneley; C Busch
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Morphological identification of the patterns of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and their importance.

Authors:  R Montironi; R Mazzucchelli; F Algaba; A Lopez-Beltran
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  The significance of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia for the development of prostate carcinoma. An update.

Authors:  B G Helpap; D G Bostwick; R Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Phenotypic relationships of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia to invasive prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  R B Nagle; M K Brawer; J Kittelson; V Clark
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Review of prostatic surgical procedures at a predominantly black hospital: a 22-year study.

Authors:  M Y Heshmat; J Kovi; M S Rao; S Mohla; D W Spurlin; G Jean-Baptiste
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Independent predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a single center experience.

Authors:  Marius Kinčius; Aivaras Jonas Matjošaitis; Darius Trumbeckas; Ramūnas Mickevičius; Daimantas Milonas; Mindaugas Jievaltas
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2011-03-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.