Literature DB >> 33378513

Anteroposterior skeletofacial classification and its relationship to maxillary second molar buccopalatal angulation.

Timothy P Levine, Gregory J Matthews, Lydia A Salama, Alan Yee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare second molar angulation to the occlusal plane with cephalometric measurements corresponding to AP skeletal discrepancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 72 patients' pre-orthodontic records were analyzed. A plane was constructed along the cusps of the upper second molar and measured to a proxy for the occlusal plane. The angle between the planes was measured. ANB, Wits appraisal, U1-SN, IMPA, A-B perpendicular to Frankfort, and overjet were measured on the patients' cephalograms. Generalized additive mixed model analysis was performed to analyze the relationship between the second molar angulation and the cephalometric measurements.
RESULTS: All six cephalometric measurements showed a significant relationship with the second molar angulation, with Class III patients having a larger angle than Class II and I patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Class III patients have upper second molars that are significantly tipped from the occlusal plane. The second molars require special attention for correction prior to orthognathic surgery for Class III patients in order to avoid deleterious effects from the malpositioned teeth.
© 2020 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Class III; Occlusion; Orthognathic; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33378513      PMCID: PMC8028444          DOI: 10.2319/121719-809.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  16 in total

1.  An investigation of overeruption of posterior teeth with partial occlusal contact.

Authors:  H L Craddock
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.837

2.  Don't forget the second molars.

Authors:  Robert G Keim
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2007-05

3.  Comparison of incisor inclination in patients with Class III malocclusion treated with orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage.

Authors:  Beth A Troy; Shiva Shanker; Henry W Fields; Katherine Vig; William Johnston
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 4.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The effects of extracting upper second permanent molars on lower second permanent molar position.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1996-05

6.  Clinical protocol for occlusal adjustment: Rationale and application.

Authors:  Roger A Solow
Journal:  Cranio       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.020

Review 7.  Orthodontic objectives in orthognathic surgery: state of the art today.

Authors:  Roy Sabri
Journal:  World J Orthod       Date:  2006

8.  The Relationship between Agenesis of Third Molar and Craniofacial Morphology in Orthodontic Patients.

Authors:  Mahdjoube Goldani Moghadam; Farzane Etemadi; Narjes Akbari
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2018-07-18

Review 9.  Complications associated with orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-02-20

10.  Surgical Occlusion Setup in Correction of Skeletal Class III Deformity Using Surgery-First Approach: Guidelines, Characteristics and Accuracy.

Authors:  Yu-Fang Liao; Shu Hsien Lo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.