Literature DB >> 16779977

Orthodontic objectives in orthognathic surgery: state of the art today.

Roy Sabri1.   

Abstract

In treating jaw discrepancies, camouflage and surgery have different treatment modalities, often involving opposite orthodontic mechanics and different extraction decisions. Pretreatment identification of surgical patients is therefore essential. Esthetics, function, stability, and treatment time have to be considered and patients provided the information they need to be part of the decision-making process. The goal of presurgical orthodontics is to position the teeth, allowing an optimal skeletal correction at surgery. While intra-arch alignment is similar to conventional orthodontics, leveling is not carried out automatically in surgical patients. In open-bite cases, steps within the arches are an indication for segmental surgery. Orthodontic leveling will be limited to the segments, and segments will be leveled with differential intrusion at surgery. In deep-bite/short-face cases, leveling a severe curve of Spee should be done after the occlusion is unlocked by surgery. Anteroposteriorly, dental compensations are removed by ideally positioning the teeth relative to their apical bases. This will make the malocclusion look worse presurgically, but it will unravel the true magnitude of the skeletal problem, thus allowing an optimal correction at surgery. It is important to recognize if a transverse problem is skeletal or dental in nature and if the correction should be done orthodontically, by segmental surgery, or by surgically assisted palatal expansion. No orthodontic expansion should be done presurgically in a patient who will have surgical expansion. Any tooth movement with relapse potential should be avoided presurgically. Postsurgical orthodontics will bring teeth into position and proper intercuspation within a reasonable time period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16779977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthod        ISSN: 1530-5678


  7 in total

1.  Anteroposterior skeletofacial classification and its relationship to maxillary second molar buccopalatal angulation.

Authors:  Timothy P Levine; Gregory J Matthews; Lydia A Salama; Alan Yee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Postsurgical Orthodontic Treatment Planning: a Case Report with 20 Years Follow-up.

Authors:  Giampietro Farronato; Umberto Garagiola; Vera Carletti; Paolo Cressoni; Carmen Mortellaro
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2011-07-01

3.  Hard- and soft-tissue profiles of the midface region in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography multiplanar-reconstructed image analysis.

Authors:  Bomi Kim; Hyung-Chul Lee; Seong-Hun Kim; Yongil Kim; Woosung Son; Seong Sik Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Surgical Orthodontic Treatment of Severe Skeletal Class II.

Authors:  Fahad F Alsulaimani; Maisa O Al-Sebaei; Ahmed R Afify
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2013-03-19

5.  Condylectomy and "surgery first" approach: An expedited treatment for condylar hyperplasia in a patient with facial asymmetry.

Authors:  Diego Fernando López; Juan Fernando Aristizábal; Rosana Martínez-Smit
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

6.  Comparison of changes in the transverse dental axis between patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry treated by orthognathic surgery with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Han-Sol Song; Sung-Hwan Choi; Jung-Yul Cha; Kee-Joon Lee; Hyung-Seog Yu
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 7.  Facial asymmetry correction: From conventional orthognathic treatment to surgery-first approach.

Authors:  Tahereh Hosseinzadeh Nik; Elaheh Gholamrezaei; Mohammad Ali Keshvad
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2019
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.