Literature DB >> 33377992

Parotid sparing and quality of life in long-term survivors of locally advanced head and neck cancer after intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Silke Tribius1,2, Sven Haladyn3, Henning Hanken4, Chia-Jung Busch5, Andreas Krüll3, Cordula Petersen3, Corinna Bergelt6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) enables radiation oncologists to optimally spare organs at risk while achieving homogeneous dose distribution in the target volume. Despite great advances in technology, xerostomia is one of the most detrimental long-term side effects after multimodal therapy in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC). This prospective observational study examines the effect of parotid sparing on quality of life in long-term survivors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 138 patients were grouped into unilateral (n = 75) and bilateral (n = 63) parotid sparing IMRT and questioned at 3, 24, and 60-month follow-up using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. Treatment-related toxicity was scored according to the RTOG/EORTC toxicity criteria. Patients' QoL 24 and 60 months after IMRT was analyzed by ANCOVA using baseline QoL (3 months after IMRT) as a covariate.
RESULTS: Patients with bilateral and unilateral parotid-sparing IMRT surviving 60 months experience similar acute and late side effects and similar changes in QoL. Three months after IMRT, physical and emotional function as well as fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, and financial problems are below (function scales) or above (symptom scales) the threshold of clinical importance. In both groups, symptom burden (EORTC H&N35) is high independent of parotid sparing 3 months after IMRT and decreases over time in a similar pattern. Pain and financial function remain burdensome throughout.
CONCLUSION: Long-term HNC survivors show a similar treatment-related toxicity profile independent of unilateral vs. bilateral parotid-sparing IMRT. Sparing one or both parotids had no effect on global QoL nor on the magnitude of changes in function and symptom scales over the observation period of 60 months. The financial impact of the disease and its detrimental effect on long-term QoL pose an additional risk to unmet needs in this special patient population. These results suggest that long-term survivors need and most likely will benefit from early medical intervention and support within survivorship programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute ans late side effects; Long-term survivor; Multimodal therapy; Survivorship program; Xerostomia

Year:  2020        PMID: 33377992     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01737-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  54 in total

1.  Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  A Eisbruch; R K Ten Haken; H M Kim; L H Marsh; J A Ship
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A comparison of mean parotid gland dose with measures of parotid gland function after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: implications for future trials.

Authors:  Judith M Roesink; Maria Schipper; Wim Busschers; Cornelis P J Raaijmakers; Chris H J Terhaard
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Influence of radiation dose to pharyngeal constrictor muscles on late dysphagia and quality of life in patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  S Mogadas; C-J Busch; C Pflug; H Hanken; A Krüll; C Petersen; S Tribius
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Reducing xerostomia after chemo-IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: beyond sparing the parotid glands.

Authors:  Michael Little; Matthew Schipper; Felix Y Feng; Karen Vineberg; Craig Cornwall; Carol-Anne Murdoch-Kinch; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Residual deficits in quality of life one year after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer: Results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Silke Tribius; Marieclaire Raguse; Christian Voigt; Adrian Münscher; Alexander Gröbe; Cordula Petersen; Andreas Krüll; Corinna Bergelt; Susanne Singer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Matched case-control study of quality of life and xerostomia after intensity-modulated radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: initial report.

Authors:  Siavash Jabbari; Hyungjin M Kim; Mary Feng; Alexander Lin; Christina Tsien; Mohamed Elshaikh; Jeffrey E Terrel; Carol Murdoch-Kinch; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christopher M Nutting; James P Morden; Kevin J Harrington; Teresa Guerrero Urbano; Shreerang A Bhide; Catharine Clark; Elizabeth A Miles; Aisha B Miah; Kate Newbold; MaryAnne Tanay; Fawzi Adab; Sarah J Jefferies; Christopher Scrase; Beng K Yap; Roger P A'Hern; Mark A Sydenham; Marie Emson; Emma Hall
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Xerostomia after radiotherapy. What matters--mean total dose or dose to each parotid gland?

Authors:  S Tribius; J Sommer; C Prosch; A Bajrovic; A Muenscher; M Blessmann; A Kruell; C Petersen; M Todorovic; P Tennstedt
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Impact of radiation-induced xerostomia on quality of life after primary radiotherapy among patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Anke Petra Jellema; Ben J Slotman; Patricia Doornaert; C René Leemans; Johannes A Langendijk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Impact on quality of life of IMRT versus 3-D conformal radiation therapy in head and neck cancer patients: A case control study.

Authors:  Edvard Abel; Ewa Silander; Jan Nyman; Mogens Bove; Leif Johansson; Thomas Björk-Eriksson; Eva Hammerlid
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-05-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  Cost effectiveness and health-related quality of life of chemoradiotherapy versus radiation therapy alone in elderly head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Tanja Sprave; Vivek Verma; Alexander Fabian; Alexander Rühle; Dimos Baltas; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Nils H Nicolay
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Experiences and perceptions of social eating for patients living with and beyond head and neck cancer: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Mark Dornan; Cherith Semple; Anne Moorhead
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  Organs-at-risk dose constraints in head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy using a dataset from a multi-institutional clinical trial (JCOG1015A1).

Authors:  Masahiro Inada; Yasumasa Nishimura; Satoshi Ishikura; Kazuki Ishikawa; Naoya Murakami; Takeshi Kodaira; Yoshinori Ito; Kazuhiko Tsuchiya; Yuji Murakami; Junichi Saito; Tetsuo Akimoto; Kensei Nakata; Michio Yoshimura; Teruki Teshima; Takashi Toshiyasu; Yosuke Ota; Toshiyuki Minemura; Hidetoshi Shimizu; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.309

4.  Clinical performance evaluation of O-Ring Halcyon Linac: A real-world study.

Authors:  Guang-Yu Wang; Qi-Zhen Zhu; He-Ling Zhu; Ling-Juan Jiang; Nan Zhao; Zhi-Kai Liu; Fu-Quan Zhang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 1.534

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.