Literature DB >> 22056067

Reducing xerostomia after chemo-IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: beyond sparing the parotid glands.

Michael Little1, Matthew Schipper, Felix Y Feng, Karen Vineberg, Craig Cornwall, Carol-Anne Murdoch-Kinch, Avraham Eisbruch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether, in addition to sparing the parotid glands (PGs), xerostomia after chemotherapy plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (chemo-IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer is affected by reducing the dose to the other salivary glands. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 78 patients with Stage III-IV oropharynx/nasopharynx cancer underwent chemo-IMRT, with the aim of sparing the parts of the bilateral PGs, oral cavity (OC) containing the minor salivary glands, and contralateral submandibular gland (SMG) outside the target (when contralateral level I was not a target). Before therapy and periodically for 24 months, validated patient-reported xerostomia questionnaire (XQ) scores and observer-graded xerostomia scores were recorded. Also, the stimulated and unstimulated saliva was measured selectively from each of the PGs and SMGs. The mean OC doses served as surrogates of minor salivary gland dysfunction. Regression models assessed the XQ and observer-graded xerostomia predictors.
RESULTS: Statistically significant predictors of the XQ score on univariate analysis included the OC, PG, and SMG mean doses and the baseline XQ score, time since RT, and both stimulated and unstimulated PG saliva flow rates. Similar factors were statistically significant predictors of observer-graded xerostomia. The OC, PG, and SMG mean doses were moderately intercorrelated (r = 0.47-0.55). On multivariate analyses, after adjusting for the PG and SMG doses, the OC mean dose (p < .0001), interval from RT (p < .0001), and stimulated PG saliva (p < .0025) were significant predictors of the XQ scores and the OC mean dose and time for observer-graded xerostomia. Although scatter plots showed no thresholds, an OC mean dose of <40 Gy and contralateral SMG mean dose of <50 Gy were each associated with low patient-reported and observer-rated xerostomia at almost all post-therapy points.
CONCLUSION: The PG, SMG, and OC mean doses were significant predictors of both patient-reported and observer-rated xerostomia after chemo-IMRT, with OC doses remaining significant after adjusting for the PG and SMG doses. These results support efforts to spare all the salivary glands by IMRT, beyond the PGs alone.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22056067      PMCID: PMC3288420          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

1.  Quantitative dose-response analysis of salivary function following radiotherapy using sequential RI-sialography.

Authors:  H Tsujii
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Does radiation dose to the salivary glands and oral cavity predict patient-rated xerostomia and sticky saliva in head and neck cancer patients treated with curative radiotherapy?

Authors:  Anke Petra Jellema; Patricia Doornaert; Ben J Slotman; C Rene Leemans; Johannes A Langendijk
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang; P S Albert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Grading xerostomia by physicians or by patients after intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Amichay Meirovitz; Carol Anne Murdoch-Kinch; Mathew Schipper; Charlie Pan; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Xerostomia and quality of life after intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: initial report on a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Edmond H N Pow; Dora L W Kwong; Anne S McMillan; May C M Wong; Jonathan S T Sham; Lucullus H T Leung; W Keung Leung
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Sparing of the submandibular glands by intensity modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Kauko Saarilahti; Mauri Kouri; Juhani Collan; Aki Kangasmäki; Timo Atula; Heikki Joensuu; Mikko Tenhunen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 7.  In defense of the oral cavity: structure, biosynthesis, and function of salivary mucins.

Authors:  L A Tabak
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 19.318

8.  Xerostomia and its predictors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  A Eisbruch; H M Kim; J E Terrell; L H Marsh; L A Dawson; J A Ship
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Impact of salivary gland dosimetry on post-IMRT recovery of saliva output and xerostomia grade for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with or without contralateral submandibular gland sparing: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Zhong-He Wang; Chao Yan; Zhi-Yuan Zhang; Chen-Ping Zhang; Hai-Sheng Hu; Wen-Yong Tu; Jessica Kirwan; William M Mendenhall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Prospective randomized study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on salivary gland function in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Michael K M Kam; Sing-Fai Leung; Benny Zee; Ricky M C Chau; Joyce J S Suen; Frankie Mo; Maria Lai; Rosalie Ho; Kin-yin Cheung; Brian K H Yu; Samuel K W Chiu; Peter H K Choi; Peter M L Teo; Wing-hong Kwan; Anthony T C Chan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  41 in total

1.  Long-term quality of life after swallowing and salivary-sparing chemo-intensity modulated radiation therapy in survivors of human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Vainshtein; Dominic H Moon; Felix Y Feng; Douglas B Chepeha; Avraham Eisbruch; Matthew H Stenmark
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  [Analysis of the risk factors of radiation-induced caries in patients with head and neck cancer].

Authors:  Li-Ling Wu; Qing-Ping Gao; Qiong-Yao Fu; Kun Geng
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-02-01

3.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)-issues in the inclusion of cervical nodal region in radiation treatment volume-author's reply.

Authors:  Mei Li; Zhi-Xiong Lin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Can xerostomia be further reduced by sparing parotid stem cells?

Authors:  Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

5.  Parotid sparing and quality of life in long-term survivors of locally advanced head and neck cancer after intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Silke Tribius; Sven Haladyn; Henning Hanken; Chia-Jung Busch; Andreas Krüll; Cordula Petersen; Corinna Bergelt
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 6.  Treatment of late sequelae after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Primož Strojan; Katherine A Hutcheson; Avraham Eisbruch; Jonathan J Beitler; Johannes A Langendijk; Anne W M Lee; June Corry; William M Mendenhall; Robert Smee; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 12.111

7.  Residual deficits in quality of life one year after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer: Results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Silke Tribius; Marieclaire Raguse; Christian Voigt; Adrian Münscher; Alexander Gröbe; Cordula Petersen; Andreas Krüll; Corinna Bergelt; Susanne Singer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Can sparing of the superficial contralateral parotid lobe reduce xerostomia following radiotherapy for head and neck cancer?

Authors:  Daan Nevens; Sandra Nuyts
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Analysis of factors influencing the development of xerostomia during intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ken Randall; Jason Stevens; Juan Fernando Yepes; Marcus E Randall; Mahesh Kudrimoti; Jonathan Feddock; Jing Xi; Richard J Kryscio; Craig S Miller
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2013-03-22

10.  Toxicities affecting quality of life after chemo-IMRT of oropharyngeal cancer: prospective study of patient-reported, observer-rated, and objective outcomes.

Authors:  Klaudia U Hunter; Matthew Schipper; Felix Y Feng; Teresa Lyden; Mark Haxer; Carol-Anne Murdoch-Kinch; Benjamin Cornwall; Connie S Y Lee; Douglas B Chepeha; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.