Literature DB >> 33377067

Replication-Independent Generation and Morphological Analysis of Flavivirus Replication Organelles.

Sarah Goellner1, Berati Cerikan1, Mirko Cortese1, Christopher J Neufeldt1, Uta Haselmann1,2, Ralf Bartenschlager1,2.   

Abstract

Positive-strand RNA viruses replicate in distinct membranous structures called replication organelles (ROs). Mechanistic studies of RO formation have been difficult because perturbations affecting viral replication have an impact on viral protein amounts, thus affecting RO biogenesis. Here, we present a detailed guide on how to use a replication-independent expression system, designated pIRO (plasmid-induced replication organelle formation), inducing bona fide flavivirus ROs in transfected cells. This will be useful for mechanistic studies of viral and cellular factors driving flavivirus RO biogenesis. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Cerikan et al. (2020).
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell Biology; Microscopy; Molecular Biology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33377067      PMCID: PMC7757399          DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  STAR Protoc        ISSN: 2666-1667


Before You Begin

Solutions are prepared following the recipes in the Materials and Equipment section. Solutions which are prepared in advance and can be stored are indicated. A complete list of Materials and Equipment required is given in the Key Resources Table.

Key Resources Table

Materials and Equipment

CRITICAL: All solutions and materials used for cell culture have to be sterilized either by filtration or autoclaving.

Mammalian Cell Culture Medium

Timing: <1 h Complete cell culture medium is prepared by adding the supplements specified in the table below to Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM):

Zeocin Stock and Working Solutions

Timing: <10 min For maintaining a stable expression of the T7 RNA polymerase in Huh7/Lunet-T7 cells, zeocin is added freshly to the cell culture medium. The zeocin stock solution of 100 mg/mL can be stored at −20°C for up to 18 months. To avoid repetitive freeze-thaw cycles of the zeocin stock solution, a ready-to-use solution of 1 mg/mL can be prepared by diluting zeocin (100 mg/mL) in DMEM complete medium. Aliquots of 1 mL are stored at −20°C. Zeocin is added into the cell culture medium at a final concentration of 5 μg/mL.

Solutions for Electron Microscopy

Timing: 1–2 days CRITICAL: Every reagent and solution used for electron microscopy should be filtered before usage. Furthermore, make sure that every equipment used is free of dust particles. CRITICAL: Every solution containing aldehydes, cacodylate, uranium, or lead should be prepared under fume hoods as these reagents are highly toxic upon inhalation, ingestion, or skin contact. Therefore, it is required to wear proper protection such as goggles, nitrile gloves, and a lab coat. Preparation of the 0.2 M cacodylate buffer. Dissolve 21.4 g of cacodylate acid sodium trihydrate in 400 mL of distilled water. Adjust the pH with HCl and/or NaOH to 7.2–7.4. Adjust the volume to 500 mL with distilled water. Cacodylate buffer can be stored at 4°C. Fixative buffer for electron microscopy samples is prepared by adding all supplements specified in the table below to cacodylate buffer: Fixative buffer should be prepared fresh on the day of usage. Stock solutions of KCl, MgCl2, and CaCl2 can be prepared in advance and stored at ∼22°C. We recommend preparing all solutions with HPLC-grade water. Contrast enhancement of samples with uranyl acetate (UA) and lead citrate. Prepare a 3% UA stock solution by dissolving 3 g of UA in 100 mL EM graded ddH2O. Aqueous lead citrate is prepared according to Reynolds (1963). Solutions are stored wrapped in aluminum foil at 4°C. We recommend filtering the solutions before use. In particular lead citrate forms insoluble complexes with CO2. To avoid CO2, we recommend using degassed ddH2O. To prepare graded ethanol series (from 50% to 100%) dilute absolute ethanol (99.9%) to the final % (v/v) in ddH2O. Graded ethanol solutions are stored in flammable storage cupboards at ∼22°C. Epoxy resin for flat embedding is prepared by mixing the following chemicals while stirring: CRITICAL: It is of utmost importance to avoid air bubbles while preparing the epoxy resin solution. The final mixture is stored in 20 mL syringes, sealed with parafilm, at −20°C. CRITICAL: Warm epoxy resin to ∼22°C at least 30 min before usage.

Preparation of Formvar Film-Coated EM Grids for Electron Microscopy

Timing: ∼1–2 days CRITICAL: For preparing EM mesh grids we recommend avoiding humid places and rooms with an active air conditioner. Prepared mesh grids can be stored in a petri dish at ∼22°C. However, make sure to cover the grids as dust particles will interfere with sample analysis. Formvar Film-coated EM mesh grids are prepared according to Sherman (2014) with slight modifications. Prepare a 1.2% formvar solution in chloroform. Impurities can be removed by filtering the solution using a 0.2 μm Whatman filter. Clean glass slides using distilled water and lens paper. Do not “over-clean” the glass slides as this may affect the release of the formvar films. Fill a slide chamber (needs to have a thistle tube) 3–4 cm deep with formvar. To minimize evaporation of chloroform try to keep it covered. Place the clean glass slide in the chamber and let it settle for 2–3 min. Drain the formvar from the chamber in a slow but steady stream. Let the slide dry for 2–3 min. Remove the slide from the chamber and remove any residual liquid by touching the bottom with a filter paper. Scrape edges of slide and ∼0.5 cm from the bottom of the slide using a razor blade to loosen the film. Fill a container with clean water and sweep the surface with a lens paper to remove dust. Slowly lower the slide into the water at a ∼45° angle to float off the film. Films should be silver in color. If films appear gold or gray they are too thick or too thin, respectively. Place the mesh grids onto the film with the shiny or dull side down. We recommend to stay consistent and to note which side of the mesh grid has the film. Collect the formvar-coated grids by lowering a piece of parafilm at a ∼45° angle and remove it with a steady but quick down and turn motion. Excess of water is removed using a Kimwipe or filter paper. Formvar-coated grids are placed in a Petri dish for drying. Instead of formvar one can also use Pioloform FN 65 (Plano).

Solutions for Immunofluorescence Microscopy

Timing: ∼2–3 h Cells grown on glass coverslips are fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS. Dissolve 80 g of paraformaldehyde in 1.4 L H2O. Add 1 mL of 1 M NaOH and stir gently on a heating block at 60°C. CRITICAL: Do not heat too long as paraformaldehyde will evaporate causing a change in percentage of dissolved paraformaldehyde. Once solution appears clear, add 200 mL of 10× PBS. Cool solution down to ∼22°C. Adjust the pH with HCl to 7.4. Adjust the volume to 2 L with H2O. Solution can be filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane filter. The final 4% PFA solution is stored as 13 mL aliquots at −20°C. CRITICAL: We recommend thawing one PFA aliquot at a time and once thawed it should be used within 5 days. Repeated freeze/thaw cycles are not recommended.

Solutions for Western Blot Analysis

Timing: ∼2–3 h For western blot analysis, cells are directly lysed in 2× sample buffer. A 6× sample buffer stock can be prepared ahead of time and stored at −20°C in 2 mL aliquots. Sample buffer for western blot analysis is prepared by combining all reagents as specified in the table below: For degrading contaminating nucleic acids, we add 1 μL of the benzonase (stock: 10KU) to 100 μL sample buffer before heating at 95°C for 5 min.

Step-By-Step Method Details

General Description of the Construct Design

To enable investigation of the flaviviral replication organelle biogenesis independent of viral replication, an expression plasmid is required which can continuously be transcribed and translated by the host cell machinery. Since flaviviruses replicate in the cytoplasm and therefore, the viral RNA genome is not spliced, expression of flaviviral constructs by conventional expression plasmids bears the risk of inadvertent splicing, thus affecting the expression of viral proteins. Therefore, we employ a cytoplasmic transcription/translation system originally developed by Fuerst et al. (1986). For this, parts of the viral genome (ETm-3′ UTR; Figure 1) are inserted into the pTM expression plasmid, which allows cytoplasmic transcription via the promoter of the T7 RNA polymerase. By using the Huh7/Lunet-T7 cell line, which stably expresses the T7 RNA polymerase, viral RNA is continuously produced upon DNA transfection. To promote RNA translation, an EMCV IRES element is added to the 5′ end of the viral open reading frame encoding the polyprotein. To ensure the generation of viral RNAs with an authentic 3′UTR, the hepatitis D virus ribozyme was inserted downstream of the ZIKV or DENV 3′ UTR (Figure 1). The present protocol describes the procedure for inducing and analyzing replication organelles of Zika virus (the pIRO-Z system). However, the same method can be applied to dengue virus replication organelles, simply by switching the backbone plasmid from pIRO-Z to pIRO-D.
Figure 1

Design of the pIRO Construct

Schematic representation of the pIRO (pTM/Δ 5′SLAB–3′WT-Ribozyme) expression plasmid. The pIRO construct is composed of the T7 RNA polymerase promoter (blue box), a short part of the capsid coding region containing the 5′ cyclization sequence (CS), the internal ribosome entry site (IRES) of the encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) to facilitate high-level RNA translation, the NS1 to NS5 coding region, the 3′ non-translated region (NTR), and the HDV ribozyme for generating authentic 3′ ends. The nucleotide positions of the ZIKV H/PF/2013 (GenBank accession number KJ776791.2) and DENV-2 genome (GenBank accession number NC_001474.2) used to generate the constructs are given below each element in brackets. Sequences of ZIKV are given in green; sequences corresponding to DENV are given in purple.

Design of the pIRO Construct Schematic representation of the pIRO (pTM/Δ 5′SLAB–3′WT-Ribozyme) expression plasmid. The pIRO construct is composed of the T7 RNA polymerase promoter (blue box), a short part of the capsid coding region containing the 5′ cyclization sequence (CS), the internal ribosome entry site (IRES) of the encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) to facilitate high-level RNA translation, the NS1 to NS5 coding region, the 3′ non-translated region (NTR), and the HDV ribozyme for generating authentic 3′ ends. The nucleotide positions of the ZIKV H/PF/2013 (GenBank accession number KJ776791.2) and DENV-2 genome (GenBank accession number NC_001474.2) used to generate the constructs are given below each element in brackets. Sequences of ZIKV are given in green; sequences corresponding to DENV are given in purple.

Plasmids Transfection and Validation of Experiments

Timing: ∼2 weeks in total Huh7/Lunet-T7 cells are seeded for transfection experiments which will be analyzed 18 h.p.t. (pIRO-Z) or 20 h.p.t. (pIRO-D) by western blot, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy.

Seeding of Cells

Timing: ∼1 h One day prior to transfection, Huh7/Lunet-T7 cells are seeded either on glass coverslips in 24-well plates or 6-well plates at a cell density of 3 × 104 cells/well and 2 × 105 cells/well, respectively. Cells grown on glass coverslips in 24-well plates are used to estimate the transfection efficiency via immunofluorescence microscopy and to analyze the ultrastructural membranous rearrangements via electron microscopy. Cells seeded in a 6-well plate are subjected to western blot analysis for verifying polyprotein expression and processing.

Transfection of Cells

Timing: ∼5 h On the day of transfection, change medium of seeded cells at least 30 min prior to transfection. We recommend replacing the medium by 500 μL/well fresh and pre-warmed DMEM complete medium for 24-well plates and 1 mL/well in case of a 6-well plate. Prepare the transfection mixture in sterile reaction tubes: Place OptiMEM reduced serum medium (24-well plate: 100 μL; 6-well plate: 400 μL) into a sterile reaction tube. Add plasmid DNA (24-well plate: 500 ng; 6-well plate: 2 μg) and gently vortex to mix completely. Add Mirus TransIT-LT1 transfection reagent (24-well plate: 1.5 μL; 6-well plate: 6 μL) to the DNA mixture. Make sure while adding the transfection reagent to not touch the sides of the reaction tube. Mix completely by vortexing. To allow complex formation, incubate mixture at ∼22°C for 20 min. As recommended by the manufacturer, warm the transfection reagent to ∼22°C and gently vortex before usage. If more than one well is being transfected, scale up accordingly and prepare a transfection master mix. Transfection mixtures are added to the cells in a drop-wise manner. To ensure even distribution of the TransIT-LT1 reagent:DNA complexes, gently rock the plates back-and-forth and side-to-side. Incubate plates for 4 h at 37°C and 5% CO2 before changing the transfection medium to fresh DMEM complete. Once the medium is exchanged, expression of the polyprotein is allowed for a maximum of 18 h (pIRO-Z) or 20 h (pIRO-D).

Collecting Samples

Timing: <1 h Immunofluorescence microscopy samples. Cells are washed three times with sterile PBS prior to fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (step 10). Fixation is allowed for 10 min at ∼22°C. Fixed cells are washed three times with sterile PBS. Samples can either be directly further processed or stored at 4°C. Pause Point: PFA fixed cells can be stored for up to 1 week at 4°C. If samples are stored at 4°C we recommend to cover the coverslips with 1 mL of PBS. Electron microscopy samples. Cells are washed three times with sterile PBS prior to fixation with EM fixative buffer (step 4). Fixation is allowed for at least 30 min at ∼22°C. Samples can either be directly further processed for EPON flat embedding or stored at 4°C in fixation buffer for up to 3 days. Pause Point: Cells fixed for downstream EM analysis can be stored for up to 3 days at 4°C in fixative buffer. Add sufficient amount of fixative buffer to the well to keep the coverslips covered. Western blot samples. Cells are lysed by adding 100 μL/well of 2× sample buffer (step 16) supplemented with 1 μL of benzonase (stock: 10KU). Degradation of nucleic acids is allowed for 5 min at ∼22°C. Transfer samples to 1.5 mL reaction tubes and heat samples at 95°C for 5 min. Samples can either immediately subjected to SDS-PAGE or stored at −20°C.

Characterization of the pIRO-Z Construct

Timing: ∼2 weeks CRITICAL: After samples are collected, we recommend to first analyze the transfection efficiency via immunofluorescence microscopy before processing the remaining samples. Estimation of the transfection efficiency. Cells are permeabilized with 0.5 mL 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for up to 10 min at ∼22°C. Permeabilized cells are washed three times with 1 mL PBS before being incubated for 1 h in 0.5 mL blocking buffer (10% FCS in PBS) at ∼22°C. Primary antibodies against ZIKV NS4B are diluted 1:250 in 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS. Incubation with primary antibodies can either be done at 4°C for up to 16 h or 2 h at ∼22°C. Coverslips are washed three times with PBS-T (0.01% Tween20) 10 min each. Alexa Fluorophore 568-conjugated secondary antibodies are diluted 1:1,000 in 3% BSA in PBS. Cells are incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at ∼22°C in the dark. Samples are washed three times with PBS-T (0.01% Tween20) 10 min each. Before mounting, coverslips are rinsed once with ddH2O. Coverslips are mounted on microscopy slides using 5 μL of Fluoromount-G supplemented with DAPI to stain nuclear DNA. Samples are air dried for at least 30 min at ∼22°C before being analyzed on a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope. To estimate the transfection efficiency, large overview pictures (5 × 5) are recorded using the 20× magnification objective. Transfection efficiency is calculated by determining the number of NS4B-positive cells over the total number of cells (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Transfection Efficiency of Huh7/Lunet-T7 Cells with pIRO-Z

(A) Representative IF pictures of Huh7/Lunet-T7 cells transfected with pIRO-Z at 18 h post transfection. Cells were stained using a NS4B-specific antibody. Scale bar, 200 μm.

(B) Transfection efficiency was determined by counting the number of NS4B positive cells.

Transfection Efficiency of Huh7/Lunet-T7 Cells with pIRO-Z (A) Representative IF pictures of Huh7/Lunet-T7 cells transfected with pIRO-Z at 18 h post transfection. Cells were stained using a NS4B-specific antibody. Scale bar, 200 μm. (B) Transfection efficiency was determined by counting the number of NS4B positive cells. CRITICAL: The settings for recording the pictures should be set in the beginning and must not be changed for all the other samples. Processing of the polyprotein 15 μL of protein sample is subjected to a 15% SDS-PAGE. Electrophoresis is performed for 2 h at constant 100 V. Proteins are transferred onto a 0.45 μm PVDF membrane at 350 mA for 1 h at 4°C using the wet blot transfer system of Bio-Rad. Membranes are blocked in 5% milk in PBS. Primary antibodies (ZIKV NS1, NS2B, NS3, and NS4A) are diluted 1:1,000 in 1% milk in PBS. Membranes are incubated at 4°C for up to 16 h. On the next day, membranes are washed three times with PBS-T (0.1% Tween20), 10 min each. HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (anti-mouse and anti-rabbit) are diluted in 1% milk in PBS. Membranes are incubated for 1 h at ∼22°C. Membranes are washed three times with PBS-T (0.1% Tween20), 10 min each. Western blots are developed using the Western Lightning Plus-ECL reagent. Images are taken using the ChemoStar imager software package. Western blot images are analyzed using the FIJI software package (Figure 3A).
Figure 3

Functional Characterization of the pIRO-Z Construct

(A) Huh7/Lunet-T7 cells were either transfected (left column) or infected (right column) with pIRO-Z or the H/PF/2013 strain (MOI 10), respectively. Whole cell lysates were subjected to western blot analysis, and polyprotein processing was determined by probing for NS1, NS2B, NS4A, and NS3. GAPDH was used as loading control.

(B) Representative transmission electron microscopy images showing replication organelles (yellow arrowheads) induced upon pIRO-Z transfection or ZIKV infection. Mock transfected cells served as control, and only regular ER was observed (yellow arrow). Scale bars, 150 nm.

Functional Characterization of the pIRO-Z Construct (A) Huh7/Lunet-T7 cells were either transfected (left column) or infected (right column) with pIRO-Z or the H/PF/2013 strain (MOI 10), respectively. Whole cell lysates were subjected to western blot analysis, and polyprotein processing was determined by probing for NS1, NS2B, NS4A, and NS3. GAPDH was used as loading control. (B) Representative transmission electron microscopy images showing replication organelles (yellow arrowheads) induced upon pIRO-Z transfection or ZIKV infection. Mock transfected cells served as control, and only regular ER was observed (yellow arrow). Scale bars, 150 nm. Formation of the replication organelles. CRITICAL: While embedding the samples it is important to never let them dry out. Every step should be performed in a fume-hood and one should wear appropriate protection clothes. Flat embedding for EM. Rinse samples five times with 50 mM cacodylate buffer, 5 min each. Incubate with 2% osmium tetroxide in 50 mM cacodylate buffer for at least 40 min on ice. Wash samples three times with EM-grade water. Samples are incubated for up to 16 h with 0.5% aqueous uranyl acetate at 4°C. On the next day, samples are rinsed three times with EM-grade water. Dehydration is performed using a graded ethanol series (from 50% to 100%). Flip coverslips on epoxy resin filled capsules. Epon is polymerized at 60°C for at least 48 h. Thin sectioning for transmission electron microscopy. Trim polymerized sample to a 0.5 × 0.5 mm sized section using a razor blade. Mount trimmed block into an ultramicrotome holder. Align the specimens’ surface with the diamond knife in all axis. CRITICAL: Before sectioning clean the diamond knife with methanol. Fill the boat of the diamond knife with H2O up to the knifes’ edge. 70 nm thin sections are cut automatically by the microtome. Section retrieval. Floating sections are picked up with a loop and transferred onto a formvar-coated TEM grid. Dry the grid by air at ∼22°C. Contrast enhancement. Fix a parafilm on a paper or on a table. Transfer grids with sections to aqueous uranyl acetate (3%) droplets and incubate for 5 min. Wash grids with ddH2O by transferring the grid onto droplets and leaving them for 30 s on. Repeat two times. Grids are transferred to aqueous lead citrate droplets and are incubated for 5 min. Wash grids by following instructions in step iii. Grids are dried at ∼22°C before being analyzed on a JEOL JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope (Figure 3B). CRITICAL: During contrast enhancement, make sure that the sections are facing the droplet.

Expected Outcomes

Routinely we obtain a transfection efficiency of 30%–50%, which we determine by standard immunofluorescence microscopy. Transfected cells expressing the ZIKV polyprotein are identified by NS4B staining, while the total number of cells is determined by DAPI staining (see Figure 3H+I in Cerikan et al. (2020)). For quantification, we recommend to always include and analyze a mock sample for each independent IF experiment. Mock samples are used to determine the antibody background signal for quantifying the number of positive cells. We recommend analyzing large overview pictures (5 × 5) instead of single pictures as transfection might occur in clusters of cells. We seed 2 × 105 cells/well for western blot analysis to investigate the expression and processing of the viral polyprotein. Removal of the 5′ SLAB element has no effect on that. Furthermore, amounts of ZIKV proteins are comparable to a normal ZIKV infection (Figure 3) (see Figure 3C in Cerikan et al. (2020)). Electron microscopy results demonstrate that 6–10 out of 20 cells will contain replication organelles, reflecting the previously determined transfection efficiency (30%–50%) by immunofluorescence microscopy. However, variation in numbers of vesicle packets per cell frequently occur as expression levels of the polyprotein may vary between cells. For quantification of vesicle packets, at least 20 cells per experiment are analyzed (see Figure 3E–G in Cerikan et al. (2020)).

Limitations

Since EM does not allow the screening of large number of cells, transfection efficiency must be high in order to identify cells containing replication organelles. Transfection efficiency of Huh7/Lunet-T7 cells depends on 1) the confluency and condition of the cell culture and 2) the passage number of the cell culture. The optimal Huh7/Lunet-T7 culture used for experiments should be at 80%–90% confluent and have passage number

Troubleshooting

Problem

Cell death upon transfection (Step-By-Step Method Details, steps 1–5).

Potential Solution

Cell death can occur upon transfection using Mirus-LT1 when cells are seeded at a too low density. Make sure that cells are seeded as a monolayer with 70% confluency. Huh7/Lunet-T7 cells should be seeded at a density of 3–4 × 104 cells/well and 2 × 105 cells/well of 24- and 6-well plates, respectively. Transfection efficiency is low (Step-By-Step Method Details, step 9). Determine confluency of cells. If they are too confluent, they can no longer be transfected. If cell density is too low, cells are prone to die upon transfection. In addition, make sure that while preparing the transfection mixture DNA is first mixed with OptiMEM by vortexing before transfection reagent is added. Complex formation should be allowed for 20 min and not longer. In case transfection efficiency is repeatedly low, we recommend preparing a fresh plasmid DNA stock and using a fresh vial of Mirus TransIT LT1 transfection reagent. Cell death due to protein overexpression (Step-By-Step Method Details, step 10). We recommend performing an initial kinetic experiment to determine the best time point for harvesting samples. Based on our experiences, expression of pIRO-Z or pIRO-D starts to become toxic to the cells at around 18 h or 20 h post transfection, respectively. Cells are showing ultrastructural rearrangements which are not known to occur in infected cells (Step-By-Step Method Details, step 11). It is of utmost importance to never let the coverslip dry out completely. While changing the liquid in the 24-well plate it is best to leave residual liquid in each well. Drying of the cells will cause structural damage, which can only be seen when analyzing the samples with an electron microscope. Cells are breaking out of the 70 nm section (Step-By-Step Method Details, step 11b). Cells can break out of the 70 nm section when epoxy resin infiltration is not complete. Make sure, while embedding your samples, to allow the epoxy resin solution to infiltrate the cells. You can enhance infiltration by leaving the coverslips on epoxy resin filled capsules for 1 h at ∼22°C before polymerizing the samples at 60°C.

Resource Availability

Lead Contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Ralf Bartenschlager (Ralf.Bartenschlager@med.uni-heidelberg.de).

Materials Availability

All unique/stable reagents generated in this study are available from the Lead Contact with a completed Materials Transfer Agreement.

Data and Code Availability

The published protocol includes all [datasets/code] generated or analyzed during this study.
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Antibodies

α-Beta ActinSigma-AldrichA5441
α-GAPDHSanta Cruz BiotechnologySc-47724
α-RTN3Santa Cruz BiotechnologySc-374599
α-PDISigma-AldrichP7496
α-DENV NS3GeneTexGTX629477
α-DENV NS4BGeneTexGTX124250
α-DENV NS1Welsch et al., 2009N/A
α-DENV NS3Miller et al., 2006N/A
α-DENV NS4BMiller et al., 2006N/A
α-DENV NS5Miller et al., 2006N/A
α-ZIKV NS1GeneTexGTX634158
α-ZIKV NS2BGeneTexGTX133318
α-ZIKV NS3GeneTexGTX133320
α-ZIKV NS4AGeneTexGTX133704
α-ZIKV NS4BGeneTexGTX133321
α-ZIKV NS5GeneTexGTX133327
Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse IgGThermo Fisher ScientificA-21202
Alexa Fluor 568 donkey anti-rabbit IgGThermo Fisher ScientificA10042
Goat anti-mouse IgG-HRPSigma-AldrichA4416
Goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRPSigma-AldrichA6154

Bacterial and Virus Strains

DENV isolate 16681; synthetic genomeFischl and Bartenschlager, 2013N/A
ZIKV strain H/PF/2013; synthetic genomeMünster et al., 2018N/A
ZIKV strain H/PF/2013European Virus ArchiveN/A

Chemicals, Peptides, and Recombinant Proteins

BenzonaseMerck Millipore3440287
Bromophenol BlueBio-Rad1610404
CaCl2Sigma-AldrichC5670-100G
Cacodylate acid sodium trihydrateServa15540.02
ChloroformSigma-Aldrich32211-1L
DAPI Fluoromount-GSouthern Biotech0100-20
DBA hardenerCarl Roth8623.1
DMEMGibco2124909
DMP 30Carl Roth8621.1
DTTRoche20871725
Ethanol absoluteSigma-Aldrich1024282500
Fetal bovine serumGibco26140079
FormvarElectron Microscopy Sciences#15800
Glutaraldehyde EM gradeElectron Microscopy SciencesE16210
GlycerolHoneywell15523-1L
Glycidyl etherCarl Roth8619.1
HPLC waterSigma-Aldrich34877-2.5L
HClHoneywell35328-1L
KClSigma-AldrichP5833-500G
Lead citrateElectron Microscopy Sciences#17800
MgCl2Sigma Life ScienceM8266-1KG
Milk powderCarl RothT145.2
MEM non-essential amino acidsGibco11140-035
MirusIT-LT1 transfection reagentMirus91094359
MNACarl Roth8639.1
NaClBernd Kraft04160.5600
NaOHFisher Scientific1310-73-2
OptiMEM reduced mediumGibco31985-047
Paraformaldehyde 16% EM gradeScience ServicesE15700
Penicillin/StreptomycinGibco15140-122
Sodium dodecyl sulfateServa151-21-3
SucroseCarl Roth4621.1
Triton X-100Merck Millipore9036-19-5
Tween 20Carl Roth9127.1
Uranyl acetate dihydrateServa77870.10
Western Lightning Plus-ECLPerkin Elmer203-19251
ZeocinThermo FisherR25001

Experimental Models: Cell Lines

Huh7/Lunet T7Appel et al., 2005N/A

Software and Algorithms

ImageJ (FIJI)Schindelin et al., 2012https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
GraphPad Prism 5.0LaJolla, CA, USAhttps://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/
NIS – Elements Advanced ResearchNikonhttps://www.microscope.healthcare.nikon.com/products/software/nis-elements/nis-elements-advanced-research
Adobe Illustrator 5.1San Jose, CA, USAhttps://www.adobe.com/products/illustrator.html

Other

Automated Cell Counter TC20Bio-Rad1450102
EM grids (100 mesh)PlanoG2410D
PVDF membrane 0.45 μmMerck MilliporeIPVH00010
ComponentAmount
DMEM basal medium500 mL
Fetal bovine serum10%
Penicillin/Streptomycin100 U/mL
Streptomycin100 μg/mL
MEM Non-essential amino acids1%
ReagentStock ConcentrationFinal ConcentrationAmount
Cacodylate buffer0.2 M50 mM1.25 mL
KCl1 M50 mM0.25 mL
MgCl20.1 M2.6 mM0.13 mL
CaCl20.1 M2.6 mM0.13 mL
Paraformaldehyde16%1%0.3125 mL
Glutaraldehyde25%2.5%0.5 mL
SucroseN/A2%0.1 g
HPLC H2ON/AN/Ato 5 mL
Total5 mL
ReagentAmount
Glycidyl ether48 g
DBA hardener19 g
MNA hardener33 g
→ stir for 30 min until phase-free
DMP 302 g
→ stir for 30 min until phase-free
Total100 mL
ReagentStock ConcentrationFinal ConcentrationAmount
ddH2ON/AN/A5.375 mL
Tris-HCl [pH 6.8]1 M360 mM18 mL
SDS1 M180 mM9 mL
DTT1 M300 mM15 mL
Glycerol100%5.25%2.625 mL
Bromophenol blueN/A0.3%0.15 g
Total50 mL
  9 in total

1.  Subcellular localization and membrane topology of the Dengue virus type 2 Non-structural protein 4B.

Authors:  Sven Miller; Sandra Sparacio; Ralf Bartenschlager
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Eukaryotic transient-expression system based on recombinant vaccinia virus that synthesizes bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase.

Authors:  T R Fuerst; E G Niles; F W Studier; B Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  High-throughput screening using dengue virus reporter genomes.

Authors:  Wolfgang Fischl; Ralf Bartenschlager
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

4.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Schindelin; Ignacio Arganda-Carreras; Erwin Frise; Verena Kaynig; Mark Longair; Tobias Pietzsch; Stephan Preibisch; Curtis Rueden; Stephan Saalfeld; Benjamin Schmid; Jean-Yves Tinevez; Daniel James White; Volker Hartenstein; Kevin Eliceiri; Pavel Tomancak; Albert Cardona
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy.

Authors:  E S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  A Non-Replicative Role of the 3' Terminal Sequence of the Dengue Virus Genome in Membranous Replication Organelle Formation.

Authors:  Berati Cerikan; Sarah Goellner; Christopher John Neufeldt; Uta Haselmann; Klaas Mulder; Laurent Chatel-Chaix; Mirko Cortese; Ralf Bartenschlager
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Mutational analysis of hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 5A: potential role of differential phosphorylation in RNA replication and identification of a genetically flexible domain.

Authors:  Nicole Appel; Thomas Pietschmann; Ralf Bartenschlager
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  A Reverse Genetics System for Zika Virus Based on a Simple Molecular Cloning Strategy.

Authors:  Maximilian Münster; Anna Płaszczyca; Mirko Cortese; Christopher John Neufeldt; Sarah Goellner; Gang Long; Ralf Bartenschlager
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  Composition and three-dimensional architecture of the dengue virus replication and assembly sites.

Authors:  Sonja Welsch; Sven Miller; Ines Romero-Brey; Andreas Merz; Christopher K E Bleck; Paul Walther; Stephen D Fuller; Claude Antony; Jacomine Krijnse-Locker; Ralf Bartenschlager
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 21.023

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Determinants in Nonstructural Protein 4A of Dengue Virus Required for RNA Replication and Replication Organelle Biogenesis.

Authors:  Mirko Cortese; Klaas Mulder; Laurent Chatel-Chaix; Pietro Scaturro; Berati Cerikan; Anna Plaszczyca; Uta Haselmann; Marie Bartenschlager; Christopher J Neufeldt; Ralf Bartenschlager
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  The Compound SBI-0090799 Inhibits Zika Virus Infection by Blocking De Novo Formation of the Membranous Replication Compartment.

Authors:  Laura Riva; Sarah Goellner; Scott B Biering; Chun-Teng Huang; Andrey N Rubanov; Uta Haselmann; Colin M Warnes; Paul D De Jesus; Laura Martin-Sancho; Alexey V Terskikh; Eva Harris; Anthony B Pinkerton; Ralf Bartenschlager; Sumit K Chanda
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  The Biogenesis of Dengue Virus Replication Organelles Requires the ATPase Activity of Valosin-Containing Protein.

Authors:  Clément Mazeaud; Anaïs Anton; Felix Pahmeier; Aïssatou Aïcha Sow; Berati Cerikan; Wesley Freppel; Mirko Cortese; Ralf Bartenschlager; Laurent Chatel-Chaix
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 4.  Pathogenesis and virulence of flavivirus infections.

Authors:  Sophie Wilhelmina van Leur; Tiaan Heunis; Deeksha Munnur; Sumana Sanyal
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.882

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.