| Literature DB >> 33377013 |
Bernard Charroux1, Julien Royet1.
Abstract
This protocol is designed to prepare adult axenic Drosophila before monitoring their behavior in a two-choice feeding assay, where flies are confronted with an axenic versus a dead or alive bacteria-contaminated feeding solution. Several aspects of the procedure, including raising and aging flies in axenic conditions, starving adult flies, and composing feeding solutions, are detailed. The bacterium used in this protocol, Erwinia carotovora carotovora-15 2141 (Ecc-15 2141 ), is commonly used to decipher the mechanisms controlling host-pathogen interactions in the Drosophila model. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Charroux et al. (2020).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33377013 PMCID: PMC7756975 DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: STAR Protoc ISSN: 2666-1667
Figure 1Dimensions of the Apparatus Used for Behavioral Assays
Cartoon of the 6 arenas (top) and the 12 arenas (bottom) apparatus, with the following dimensions (in millimeters): 221 × 173 or 201 × 173 for the main frames of the 6 or 12 arenas apparatus respectively, and 65 × 65 or 42 × 42 for the 6 or 12 arenas, respectively. Each apparatus is composed of three distinct plastic parts, the bottom part (dark green) which is a flat plain slab on top of which is glued the plastic grid containing 6 (red on the top cartoon) or 12 (blue on the bottom cartoon) squared holes, and the 6 (or 12) removable plastic caps (light green) used to cover the arenas. The small hole shown in each cartoons is used to screw the plastic arm (not shown here) design to maintain the camera on top of the apparatus.
Figure 2This Picture Shows a 12 Arenas Apparatus with Two Drops of 35 μL of Feeding Solutions (Colored with Eriauglaucine Blue) Freshly Dispensed at Precise Location within Each Arena: 8 mm from One Side and 21 mm from the Other
Figure 3Cold Anesthetized Drosophila Are Successively Deposited, away from the Feeding Solutions, in Each of the 12 Arenas
Figure 4Analysis of the Behavior of Starved and Non-starved Canton-S Flies Showing that Non-starved Flies Displayed Reduced Attraction and Aversion to Ecc-15
(A) The drawing illustrates the two distances (d1 and d2) measured at every time frame of the video.
(B) (Left graphs) Kinetic of the Attraction Index (AI) for sucrose when starved flies or non-starved flies were given the choice between an Ecc-15contaminated sucrose solution versus sucrose only. (Right graphs) Cumulative AI (CAI) area for each specified solution (arrows) and its distribution over time.
(C) Histograms built with the CAI values from (B).
Error bars correspond to standard deviation. The preference indexes for Ecc-15are calculated with the CAI values from (B). For (B) left graphs, the black lines and the gray lines correspond respectively to the mean and the standard deviation, and for (B) right graphs, sole the mean value of the CAI obtained with the six replicates is shown in black. (A–C), show graphical data obtained from the analysis of the full video (not shown). The time period corresponding to the three short videos (Methods Videos S1, S2, and S3) shown below are indicated with red dotted lines.
Note: The AI for each time frame is calculated as follow. The distance of each of the 10 females from the droplet 1 (d1) and for the droplet 2 (d2) is measured every 5 s and the AI is calculated as the log2 ratio of the average of distances d1 divided by the average of distances d2. The d2 attraction will be translated into a positive index and the d1 by a negative one. We then calculate a CAI corresponding to the area between the AI curve and the abscissa axis for x = 0, which represents the absolute preference of the flies for each of the two feeding solutions. We then could calculate the preference index (PI) for the solution 1 as follow, PI (solution 1) = (CAI solution 1) − (CAI solution 2)/(CAI solution 1) + (CAI solution 2).
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| N/A | ||
| Agar | VWR | Cat # 20768.361 |
| Yeast extract | VWR | Cat # 24979.413 |
| Cornmeal flour Whesthove Maize H1 | Limagrain Ingredients | Cat # WESA16DS |
| Instant yeast deactivated | Confettiperfetti | N/A |
| Methylparaben sodium salt | MERCK | Cat # 106756 |
| Propionic acid | CARLOERBA | Cat # 409553 |
| Ampicillin | Euromedex | Cat # EU0400-B |
| Kanamycin | Fisher | Cat # BP906-5 |
| Tetracyclin | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat # 87128 |
| Erythromycin | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat # E5389 |
| Spectinomycin | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat # S4014 |
| Rifampicin | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat # R3501 |
| Sucrose | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat # S1888 |
| Eriauglaucine blue | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat # 861146 |
| PBS 1× | Eurobio Scientific | Cat # CS0PBS01-08 |
| Luria-Bertani Broth | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat # L3022 |
| Luria-Bertani Broth with agar | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat # L2897 |
| Bloomington Drosophila Stock center | BDSC:64349 | |
| ImageJ | ||
| Yawcam | Magnus Lundvall | |
| Flybox | N/A | |
| Precellys 24 tissue homogenizer | Bertin Technologies, France | Cat # P000669-PR240-A |
| Colorless transparent Poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) plaques of 4 mm | Vink France | Cat # 101800 |