Youngbin Lee1,2,3, Andres Canales1,2, Gabriel Loke1,2, Mehmet Kanik2,3, Yoel Fink1,2,4, Polina Anikeeva1,2,3,5. 1. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 2. Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 3. McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 4. Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 5. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.
Abstract
Multimaterial fibers engineered to integrate glasses, metals, semiconductors, and composites found applications in ubiquitous sensing, biomedicine, and robotics. The longitudinal symmetry typical of fibers, however, limits the density of functional interfaces with fiber-based devices. Here, thermal drawing and photolithography are combined to produce a scalable method for deterministically breaking axial symmetry within multimaterial fibers. Our approach harnesses a two-step polymerization in thiol-epoxy and thiol-ene photopolymer networks to create a photoresist compatible with high-throughput thermal drawing in atmospheric conditions. This, in turn, delivers meters of fiber that can be patterned along the length increasing the density of functional points. This approach may advance applications of fiber-based devices in distributed sensors, large area optoelectronic devices, and smart textiles.
Multimaterial fibers engineered to integrate glasses, metals, semiconductors, and composites found applications in ubiquitous sensing, biomedicine, and robotics. The longitudinal symmetry typical of fibers, however, limits the density of functional interfaces with fiber-based devices. Here, thermal drawing and photolithography are combined to produce a scalable method for deterministically breaking axial symmetry within multimaterial fibers. Our approach harnesses a two-step polymerization in thiol-epoxy and thiol-enephotopolymer networks to create a photoresist compatible with high-throughput thermal drawing in atmospheric conditions. This, in turn, delivers meters of fiber that can be patterned along the length increasing the density of functional points. This approach may advance applications of fiber-based devices in distributed sensors, large area optoelectronic devices, and smart textiles.
Multimaterial
fibers composed of polymers, metals, and semiconductors[1−3] expand the range of applications of fiber technology to sensors,[4−8] electronics,[9−13] biomedicine,[14−18] and smart textiles.[19−24] Multimaterial fabrication affords sophisticated integration of a
diversity of functional elements within individual filaments including
electrodes,[5−16,20,21,23] diodes,[20] microfluidic
channels,[6,14,16] optical waveguides,[7,14,16] and piezoelectric sensors,[11] while preserving benefits intrinsic to fibers
including high-throughput production, micro- to nanoscale features,
and mechanical flexibility. However, the interfaces of fibers with
other systems are largely limited to their tips, which impedes their
applications in large area applications. While longitudinal symmetry
in fibers can be broken through selective capillary breakup,[12] gaining electrical, optical, or fluidic access
to the devices embedded within the fiber cladding commonly relies
on the low-throughput ablation methods.[25,26] A method offering
access to functional features along the fiber lengths would expand
the capabilities and interface density of fiber-based systems.Here, we combine two high-throughput methods: thermal drawing and
in-fiber photolithography, to create meters-long fibers with microscale
patterns along the surfaces. Unlike prior research relying on coating
of photoresists onto fiber surfaces or tips to enable lithographic
patterning,[27−31] our approach develops a high-throughput thermally drawable photoresist
based on a thiol–epoxy/thiol–ene network with thermal
and photopolymerization properties. Our approach enables deterministic
breaking of the conventional longitudinal symmetry in fibers and paves
the way toward high-density interfaces with the embedded functional
elements within fibers. By producing hundreds of meters of lithographically
enhanced fibers, our approach may advance applications of fiber-based
devices in large-area electronics, smart textiles, and distributed
sensing.
Results and Discussion
We developed a thermally drawable
photoresist to enable photolithographic
patterning at arbitrary points along the fiber length. A drawable
photoresist should satisfy two materials design criteria. First, it
has to be a thermoplastic with a glass transition temperature (Tg) which is in a similar range with process
temperatures of other materials constituting functional elements of
a multimaterial fiber. This implies that, at temperatures T > Tg, a photopolymer could
be aligned and stretched along the drawing direction while avoiding
complete cross-linking during fiber fabrication. Second, a photolithographic
patterning of a drawn fiber constituent, termed here as “in-fiber
photolithography”, favors negative photoresists, because the
cross-linked structure characteristic of positive photoresists[32] prevents the rheological flow required for thermal
drawing. In contrast, the incomplete or non-cross-linked structure
of negative photoresists permits their fiber processing.We
found that a thiol–epoxy/thiol–enephotopolymer
network can be engineered to satisfy the thermally drawable photoresist
design criteria. Thiol–ene chemistry has been widely used in
coatings and traditional lithography due to its low inhibition of
oxygen and minimal mechanical deformation during polymerization.[32,33] However, low melting temperatures of the monomer components of the
thiol–ene photoresist prior to light exposure make them incompatible
with thermal codrawing with high-performance thermoplastics, glasses,
and composites comprising functional fibers. To enable thermal drawing
of the thiol–ene system alongside other materials, a monomer
with epoxy functional group was added to create a thermoplastic with Tg via thiol–epoxy polymerization.[34,35] For our thiol–epoxy/thiol–ene based drawable photoresist,
tris[2-(3-mercaptopropionyloxy)ethyl] isocyanurate (TMICN), bisphenol
A diglycidyl ether (BADGE), and 1,3,5-triallyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6
(1H,3H,5H)-trione (TATATO) were selected as monomers with thiol, epoxy
and alkene functional groups, respectively (Figure a). This thiol–epoxy/thiol–ene
system enables independent thermal and photopolymerization based on
click chemistry between the thiols and epoxy or alkene functional
groups, respectively (Figure S1).[35] During thermal-curing, the alternating thiol
trifunctional TMICN and epoxy bifunctional BADGE form a linear or
branched thermoplastic polymer compatible with thermal drawing. During
photocuring under ultraviolet (UV) light, a thiol–ene reaction
between the remaining thiol functional groups of TMICN and alkene
trifunctional groups of TATATO results in cross-linking that renders
the network insoluble in common solvents such as acetone and tetrahydrofuran
(Figure b).
Figure 1
Thiol–epoxy/thiol–ene
photopolymer. (a) Components
of the photopolymer composite. The red and blue circles represent
functional groups reacting during thermal and photocuring, respectively.
(b) Schematic of the photolithographic patterning process of the thiol–epoxy/thiol–ene
network. The yellow, red, and blue colors denote the noncured, the
thermally cured, and the photocured photoresist. Gray color marks
the substrate.
Thiol–epoxy/thiol–enephotopolymer. (a) Components
of the photopolymer composite. The red and blue circles represent
functional groups reacting during thermal and photocuring, respectively.
(b) Schematic of the photolithographic patterning process of the thiol–epoxy/thiol–ene
network. The yellow, red, and blue colors denote the noncured, the
thermally cured, and the photocured photoresist. Gray color marks
the substrate.The decrease in the number of
functional end groups at each polymerization
step was observed in the Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra
(Figure a). Differential
scanning calorimetry (DSC) shows that as the thermal-curing time increases,
the Tg of the thiol–epoxy/thiol–ene
system increases, which can likely be attributed to the formation
of longer polymer chains. This may allow for tailoring of the photoresist
thermomechanical properties to those of the other fiber components
of interest (Figure b). Photopolymerization is further detected as an increase in transmission
in the visible spectra due to the decrease in the number of conjugated
bonds following thiol–ene reaction (Figure c).[36] Together,
these analyses indicated that the thiol–epoxy/thiol–ene
system forms a thermally polymerized negative photoresist. Consistent
with these measurements, we find that the system permits the development
of patterns with a resolution of at least 1 μm (Figure d–f). This resolution
most likely presents an upper bound for achievable feature dimensions,
and significant improvements could be attained through employing collimated
light sources.
Figure 2
Characterization of thiol–epoxy/thiol–ene
photopolymer.
(a) Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measurements are
shown for the photopolymer in the uncured (black), thermally (T) cured
(red), and photocured (TP) (blue) state. Peaks in the ranges 2550–2600,
800–850, and 650–700/cm correspond to thiol, epoxy,
and alkene functional groups, respectively. (b) Differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC) shows the increase in the photopolymer Tg following 1 (black), 2 (purple), 3 (amber), and 4 (red)
hours of thermal-cuing, respectively. (c) UV–vis transmittance
spectra of the photopolymer prior to (red) and following (blue) photocuring.
All samples have been thermally cured. Shaded areas denote standard
deviation (n = 5 samples). (d–f) Scanning
electron microscope (SEM) images of patterns lithographically defined
on the free-standing photopolymer films. (d) Line patterns with 1,
10, and 100 μm thickness. (e,f) Geometric patterns.
Characterization of thiol–epoxy/thiol–enephotopolymer.
(a) Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measurements are
shown for the photopolymer in the uncured (black), thermally (T) cured
(red), and photocured (TP) (blue) state. Peaks in the ranges 2550–2600,
800–850, and 650–700/cm correspond to thiol, epoxy,
and alkene functional groups, respectively. (b) Differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC) shows the increase in the photopolymerTg following 1 (black), 2 (purple), 3 (amber), and 4 (red)
hours of thermal-cuing, respectively. (c) UV–vis transmittance
spectra of the photopolymer prior to (red) and following (blue) photocuring.
All samples have been thermally cured. Shaded areas denote standard
deviation (n = 5 samples). (d–f) Scanning
electron microscope (SEM) images of patterns lithographically defined
on the free-standing photopolymer films. (d) Line patterns with 1,
10, and 100 μm thickness. (e,f) Geometric patterns.To optimize the photopolymer composition for the thermal
drawing
and photolithography, we performed photopatterning on films of the
thiol–epoxy/thiol–ene networks with different compositions
following their thermal curing at the drawing temperature (Supporting Information). Higher epoxy content
leads to a higher Tg of the thiol–epoxy/thiol–ene
system,[34] which expands the array of polymers
that can be co-drawn with this material system. However, excess of
epoxy functional groups may yield formation of an insoluble network
through thiol–epoxy reaction alone due to the presence of trifunctional
TMICN. We found that a composition of the photopolymer network in
which 50% of the thiol groups react with epoxy and the other 50% of
the thiol groups react with alkene groups offers the highest epoxy
content that permits photopatterning following thermal-curing at the
time and temperature associated with the typical drawing process.
The resulting 2:1:1 (thiol:epoxy:alkene) ratio of the functional groups
was then employed in the rest of the experiments in this study.Unlike other methods that rely on additional post-processing steps
to incorporate photoresists into fibers,[27−31] the thiol–epoxy/thiol–enephotopolymer
could be drawn together with other materials with similar thermomechanical
properties into meters-long integrated fibers in a one-step fabrication
process (Figure a).
In our preform, a macroscopic precursor of the fiber, a single conductor
composed of a carbon-loaded polyethylene (CPE) was embedded between
the photopolymer and an insulating substrate of cyclic olefin copolymer
(COC) (Figure b).
Although thermal drawing usually maintains the feature aspect ratio,
the thickness of the photopolymer layer in the fiber became thinner
relative to the original aspect ratio in the preform (Figure c). This is likely due to the
faster flow of the thermally uncured thiol–epoxy/thiol–ene
mixture during thermal drawing in the vertical draw tower. Nevertheless,
in the resulting fibers the conductor was fully coated by an over
9 μm photopolymer layer along its entire length. To reduce the
flow of the thiol–epoxy/thiol–ene mixture during thermal
drawing, the fiber preform can be precured, which increases the mixture
viscosity and results in greater photopolymer thicknesses. Consequently,
directly following drawing the fibers can be subjected to photolithography.
Figure 3
In-fiber
photolithography. (a) Schematic depicting thermal drawing
and lithographic patterning of the multimaterial fibers. Cyclic olefin
copolymer (COC), carbon-loaded polyethylene (CPE), and thiol–epoxy/thiol–ene
photopolymer are marked with gray, black, and orange to red gradient
colors, respectively. Red and blue colors represent thermally and
photocured photopolymer, respectively. (b) Cross-sectional image of
the preform prior to thermal drawing. (c) Cross-sectional image of
the fiber thermally drawn from the preform in panel (b). An inset
presents a higher magnification image of the photopolymer layer coating
the CPE conductor. (d–g) SEM images of patterns developed directly
on the thermally drawn fibers. (d) Line patterns with 1, 10, and 100
μm thicknesses. (e) Thermally drawn fiber with a line pattern
of 500 μm thickness. (f,g) Geometric patterns. (h,i) Impedance
spectra of the CPE electrodes within the thermally drawn fibers exposed
along the length via (h) 76 μm and (i) 330 μm line patterns.
The black, red, and blue curves present the mean impedance of CPE
electrode under the conditions shown in the inset. (1) Open circuit
measurement of the epoxy-insulated fiber tip in PBS. (2) Measurement
of the CPE electrode exposed along the fiber shaft. (3) CPE electrode
tip impedance. Shaded areas represent standard error (n = 5 samples).
In-fiber
photolithography. (a) Schematic depicting thermal drawing
and lithographic patterning of the multimaterial fibers. Cyclic olefin
copolymer (COC), carbon-loaded polyethylene (CPE), and thiol–epoxy/thiol–enephotopolymer are marked with gray, black, and orange to red gradient
colors, respectively. Red and blue colors represent thermally and
photocured photopolymer, respectively. (b) Cross-sectional image of
the preform prior to thermal drawing. (c) Cross-sectional image of
the fiber thermally drawn from the preform in panel (b). An inset
presents a higher magnification image of the photopolymer layer coating
the CPE conductor. (d–g) SEM images of patterns developed directly
on the thermally drawn fibers. (d) Line patterns with 1, 10, and 100
μm thicknesses. (e) Thermally drawn fiber with a line pattern
of 500 μm thickness. (f,g) Geometric patterns. (h,i) Impedance
spectra of the CPE electrodes within the thermally drawn fibers exposed
along the length via (h) 76 μm and (i) 330 μm line patterns.
The black, red, and blue curves present the mean impedance of CPE
electrode under the conditions shown in the inset. (1) Open circuit
measurement of the epoxy-insulated fiber tip in PBS. (2) Measurement
of the CPE electrode exposed along the fiber shaft. (3) CPE electrode
tip impedance. Shaded areas represent standard error (n = 5 samples).To photolithographically pattern
thermally drawn fibers, they were
exposed to the 302 nm light through masks and immersed into acetone
over 10 min for development. Similar to photolithography on unstrained
free-standing films, patterns with resolution of at least 1 μm
were developed directly on the thermally drawn photopolymer demonstrating,
for the first time, an in-fiber photolithography with a thermoplastic
photoresist (Figure d–g). Although here photolithographic patterning was applied
to fibers with rectangular cross sections, which are compatible with
planar commercially available photomasks, curved or flexible photomasks[28,37] would similarly permit patterning of traditional cylindrical fibers
as well as those with more complex cross-sectional structures.To evaluate whether the photopolymer could provide effective electrical
insulation and could also be removed entirely to grant access to the
conductor elements within the fibers, line patterns (76 or 330 μm)
were developed above the CPE electrodes. The resultant fibers contained
electrodes exposed to the surrounding environment at its tip and at
the patterned region along its shaft. The electrode impedance was
then measured at these two locations (Figure h,i). To evaluate the insulating properties
of the photopolymer, the fiber tips were encapsulated in epoxy and
the fibers were submerged into the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
to a level below the pattern (schematic 1 in the inset of Figure h). The impedance
of ∼11.3 MΩ at 1 kHz indicated that the thermally drawn
photoresist acts as an insulator following development, which implied
that electrical access to conductors isolated with the photopolymer
could be deterministically imparted exclusively at the photolithographically
exposed locations. When the same fibers were immersed into PBS to
a level above the pattern (schematic 2 in the inset of Figure h), impedance values of 5.26
± 0.33 MΩ and 1.98 ± 0.24 MΩ at 1 kHz for 76
and 330 μm patterns, respectively, were observed consistent
with prior reports of CPE conductance in similarly sized devices[14,15] (Figure h,i). Finally,
the epoxy was mechanically removed from the fiber tips exposing the
CPE electrodes in that location. The fibers again were immersed in
PBS to a level below the pattern revealing tip impedance values of
1.83 ± 0.26 MΩ (for fibers with 76 and 330 μm patterns)
consistent with prior reports. Impedances scaling with the exposed
electrode areas measured at the tip and at the patterned points indicate
complete exposure of the electrodes along the length following in-fiber
lithography (Figure h,i). Together, these findings demonstrate that the integration of
a thermoplastic photoresist at the level of a fiber preform delivers
meters-long integrated fibers with customizable patterns along the
fiber shaft. These patterns could increase functional utility of fibers
by providing access to microdevices integrated along the length, delivering
fluids to multiple locations, and sensing a variety of signals at
predetermined points. Although coating of photoresists onto fiber
surfaces following drawing can deliver similar benefits (Figure S2), the integration of the drawable photoresists
at the macroscale takes advantage of the high-throughput fiber drawing
and avoids additional processing steps associated with surface deposition
of photoresists onto drawn fibers.
Conclusion
Two
scalable approaches—photolithography and thermal drawing—were
combined for high yield processing of fibers microscopically patternable
at arbitrary locations along the length. This was enabled by the development
of a thermoplastic photoresist with thermomechanical properties matching
those of high-performance plastics and composites. The thermally drawable
photoresist consisted of a mixture of trifunctional thiol, bifunctional
epoxy, and trifunctional alkene monomers. During thermal curing, partial
polymerization of thiol with epoxy groups resulted in a thermoplastic,
that could be co-drawn with other elements within a multimaterial
fiber. Exposing the resulting fibers to UV light led to photopolymerization
between the remaining thiol groups and trifunctional alkene molecules
forming an insoluble network. Our approach breaks the longitudinal
symmetry characteristic of fibers, while taking advantage of processing
of kilometer-scale production of micro- and nanostructured features
from macroscopic preforms. By offering access to functional elements
within fibers at multiple specified locations, this approach may expand
applications of these multifunctional multimaterial structures in
flexible, large area devices, advancing textile, sensing, and biomedical
industries.
Methods
Photopolymer Synthesis
For the thiol–epoxy/thiol–enephotopolymer which composed of 2:1:1 ratio of thiol:epoxy:alkene functional
groups, first, 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenyl-acetophenone (1.0 wt %, DMPA,
MilliporeSigma) and butylated hydroxytoluene (0.1 wt %, BHT, MilliporeSigma)
were added in melted BADGE (27.6 wt %, MilliporeSigma). DMPA was chosen
as a photoinitiator to trigger the photocuring reaction, and BHT was
used as a radical inhibitor which prevents overcuring by heat-induced
radicals created during long-time thermal curing. Then, TATATO (13.5
wt %, MilliporeSigma), TMICN (56.8 wt %, Alfa Chemistry), and tripropylamine
(1.0 wt %, MilliporeSigma) were added to the same vial. Tripropylamine
is added to catalyze the thermal curing reaction. The resulting viscous
mixture was stirred and degassed over 3 h under vacuum to remove air
bubbles. All processes were carried out under the red light.
Patterning
on Free-Standing Films
To pattern a free-standing
film, the photopolymer mixture was poured to a Teflon mold 500 μm
deep and thermally cured at 100 °C in an oven for 4 h. After
cooling, the photopolymer was covered with a soda lime/chromium mask
(Front Range Photomask) and exposed to UV lamp (UVLM-28, UVP) with
a wavelength λ = 302 nm and intensity 16.06–17.47 W/m2 during 40–50 min. In this paper, the same UV source
was used for all photocuring. After photocuring, the samples were
immersed into acetone (MilliporeSigma) over 15 min. Among solvents
that can dissolve the thermally cured photopolymer, acetone was chosen
for pattern development to increase polymer selection for other fiber
components which should have resistance to the solvent.
Characterization
For FTIR (FTIR6700, Thermo Fisher),
noncured polymer was spin-coated with tetrahydrofuran (MilliporeSigma)
on silicon wafer. The thermal curing was performed at 100 °C
in an oven (Gravity Convection Ovens, VWR International) for 10 min,
and photocuring time was 60 min. The resulting sample thicknesses
ranged 2.3–2.5 μm. The reflection mode of the FTIR was
used to record the spectra, and a resolution of 4/cm was used to accumulate
128 scans. The results were normalized with peaks of aromatic rings
of BADGE in each photopolymer because aromatic ring structure is preserved
during all curing steps.For DSC (Discovery, TA Instruments)
measurement, samples were prepared with different thermal curing times
at 100 °C in an oven. Three heating and cooling cycles were repeated
between −30 and 80 °C for each sample. The heating and
cooling rates were 10 and 20 °C/min, respectively. A nitrogen
flow of 50 mL/min was used.Using a UV–vis spectrophotometer
(Lambda 1050, PerkinElmer),
the transmittance of light with wavelengths between 200 and 800 nm
was measured through free-standing films with 500 μm thickness.
The samples were thermally cured at 100 °C in an oven for 4 h
and photocured for 40 min.
Pattern Imaging
The developed patterns
on the photopolymer
were coated with a gold film (8 nm) using a sputter coater (SC7640,
Quorum Technologies). Images of the samples were taken using scanning
electron microscopy (SEM, 6010LA, JEOL).
Thermal Drawing Process
For thermal drawing process,
a preform was assembled with a single CPE (Hillas Packaging) electrode
located in a channel milled on the COC (8007S-04, TOPAS) substrate
and hot-pressed at 125 °C for 1 h to consolidate them. CPE and
COC were selected in consideration of their thermomechanical and solvent
resistive properties (Table S1). Oxygen
plasma treatment was performed on the electrode surface of the preform
and the noncured photopolymer was poured on the surface. To reduce
flow of the photopolymer during thermal drawing, the preform was precured
at 100 °C in an oven at for a period of time within a range of
10–60 min. All precuring times within this range delivered
drawable and patternable photopolymer layers within the fibers. Longer
precuring time led to thicker photopolymer layers (∼90 μm).
After cooling, the preform was thermally drawn at 180 °C using
a custom-built draw tower similar to prior work.[14] To prevent overcuring of the photopolymer during the process,
we used feed speed of 2.3 mm/min along the vertical furnace. Since
the distance between the top and middle points of the furnace is 9
cm, the photopolymer was thermally cured for around 40 min in the
draw tower. A range of fiber cross-sectional areas was 0.64–1
mm2.
Photolithography on Fiber
After
thermal drawing, fibers
were cut to 5 cm fragments for facile processing. The thermally drawn
photoresist was photocured under UV light with covering mask at the
desired point to be patterned. While a soda lime/chromium mask was
used for general patterning, line patterns for impedance measurement
were created using metal (aluminum or nickel–chromium, McMaster-Carr)
wires as a mask to prevent damages of photopolymer by attachment to
soda lime. For photocuring, 4 min was used with the metal wires, whereas
the soda lime/chromium needed longer time of 20–30 min due
to an absorption of UV light to soda lime. For pattern development,
fibers were immersed in acetone over 10 min.
Fiber Cross-Sectional Imaging
Fibers were embedded
in an epoxy (Electron Microscopy Sciences) matrix to fix them vertically
and mechanically polished with sandpapers of gradually decreasing
grain sizes. The samples were imaged using optical microscope (AmScope).
Impedance Measurement
For impedance measurement, the
electrodes at the end of each fiber have to be exposed to connect
with external wires. Thermally drawn photopolymer at connection points
was also removed by a photolithographic process. The exposed electrodes
were connected to Cu wire (McMaster-Carr) with conductive silver paint
(SPI Supplies). Then, impedance was measured using a precision LCR
meter (HP4284A, Keysight Technologies) with a sinusoidal input (10
mV, 20 Hz–1 MHz) when a closed circuit was designed by fibers
and another external wire immersed into PBS (Corning) in a single
vial.
Authors: Mehmet Bayindir; Fabien Sorin; Ayman F Abouraddy; Jeff Viens; Shandon D Hart; John D Joannopoulos; Yoel Fink Journal: Nature Date: 2004-10-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Keiron Boyd; Simon Rees; Nikita Simakov; Jae M O Daniel; Robert Swain; Eric Mies; Alexander Hemming; W Andrew Clarkson; John Haub Journal: Opt Express Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Alexander Gumennik; Alexander M Stolyarov; Brent R Schell; Chong Hou; Guillaume Lestoquoy; Fabien Sorin; William McDaniel; Aimee Rose; John D Joannopoulos; Yoel Fink Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Noémie Chocat; Guillaume Lestoquoy; Zheng Wang; Daniel M Rodgers; John D Joannopoulos; Yoel Fink Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 30.849