Literature DB >> 33375946

An automated protocol for modelling peptide substrates to proteases.

Rodrigo Ochoa1,2, Mikhail Magnitov3,4, Roman A Laskowski3, Pilar Cossio5,6, Janet M Thornton3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proteases are key drivers in many biological processes, in part due to their specificity towards their substrates. However, depending on the family and molecular function, they can also display substrate promiscuity which can also be essential. Databases compiling specificity matrices derived from experimental assays have provided valuable insights into protease substrate recognition. Despite this, there are still gaps in our knowledge of the structural determinants. Here, we compile a set of protease crystal structures with bound peptide-like ligands to create a protocol for modelling substrates bound to protease structures, and for studying observables associated to the binding recognition.
RESULTS: As an application, we modelled a subset of protease-peptide complexes for which experimental cleavage data are available to compare with informational entropies obtained from protease-specificity matrices. The modelled complexes were subjected to conformational sampling using the Backrub method in Rosetta, and multiple observables from the simulations were calculated and compared per peptide position. We found that some of the calculated structural observables, such as the relative accessible surface area and the interaction energy, can help characterize a protease's substrate recognition, giving insights for the potential prediction of novel substrates by combining additional approaches.
CONCLUSION: Overall, our approach provides a repository of protease structures with annotated data, and an open source computational protocol to reproduce the modelling and dynamic analysis of the protease-peptide complexes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioinformatics; Peptides; Promiscuity; Proteases; Structure

Year:  2020        PMID: 33375946      PMCID: PMC7771086          DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-03931-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  66 in total

Review 1.  Protease inhibitors: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  D Leung; G Abbenante; D P Fairlie
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 2.  Directed enzyme evolution.

Authors:  E T Farinas; T Bulter; F H Arnold
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 3.  Enzyme promiscuity: mechanism and applications.

Authors:  Karl Hult; Per Berglund
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 19.536

4.  Identification of proteolytic cleavage sites by quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Mari Enoksson; Jingwei Li; Melanie M Ivancic; John C Timmer; Eric Wildfang; Alexey Eroshkin; Guy S Salvesen; W Andy Tao
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 5.  Commercial proteases: present and future.

Authors:  Qing Li; Li Yi; Peter Marek; Brent L Iverson
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  PROSPERous: high-throughput prediction of substrate cleavage sites for 90 proteases with improved accuracy.

Authors:  Jiangning Song; Fuyi Li; André Leier; Tatiana T Marquez-Lago; Tatsuya Akutsu; Gholamreza Haffari; Kuo-Chen Chou; Geoffrey I Webb; Robert N Pike; John Hancock
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 7.  Beyond directed evolution--semi-rational protein engineering and design.

Authors:  Stefan Lutz
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 9.740

8.  Molecular Binding Mechanism and Pharmacology Comparative Analysis of Noscapine for Repurposing against SARS-CoV-2 Protease.

Authors:  Neeraj Kumar; Damini Sood; Peter J van der Spek; Hari S Sharma; Ramesh Chandra
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Predicting the tolerated sequences for proteins and protein interfaces using RosettaBackrub flexible backbone design.

Authors:  Colin A Smith; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Rosetta All-Atom Energy Function for Macromolecular Modeling and Design.

Authors:  Rebecca F Alford; Andrew Leaver-Fay; Jeliazko R Jeliazkov; Matthew J O'Meara; Frank P DiMaio; Hahnbeom Park; Maxim V Shapovalov; P Douglas Renfrew; Vikram K Mulligan; Kalli Kappel; Jason W Labonte; Michael S Pacella; Richard Bonneau; Philip Bradley; Roland L Dunbrack; Rhiju Das; David Baker; Brian Kuhlman; Tanja Kortemme; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.