Literature DB >> 33375101

Machine Learning-Based Automatic Classification of Video Recorded Neonatal Manipulations and Associated Physiological Parameters: A Feasibility Study.

Harpreet Singh1, Satoshi Kusuda2, Ryan M McAdams3, Shubham Gupta1, Jayant Kalra1, Ravneet Kaur1, Ritu Das1, Saket Anand4, Ashish Kumar Pandey5, Su Jin Cho6, Satish Saluja7, Justin J Boutilier8, Suchi Saria9, Jonathan Palma10, Avneet Kaur11, Gautam Yadav12, Yao Sun13.   

Abstract

Our objective in this study was to determine if machine learning (ML) can automatically recognize neonatal manipulations, along with associated changes in physiological parameters. A retrospective observational study was carried out in two Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) between December 2019 to April 2020. Both the video and physiological data (heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO2)) were captured during NICU hospitalization. The proposed classification of neonatal manipulations was achieved by a deep learning system consisting of an Inception-v3 convolutional neural network (CNN), followed by transfer learning layers of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). Physiological signals prior to manipulations (baseline) were compared to during and after manipulations. The validation of the system was done using the leave-one-out strategy with input of 8 s of video exhibiting manipulation activity. Ten neonates were video recorded during an average length of stay of 24.5 days. Each neonate had an average of 528 manipulations during their NICU hospitalization, with the average duration of performing these manipulations varying from 28.9 s for patting, 45.5 s for a diaper change, and 108.9 s for tube feeding. The accuracy of the system was 95% for training and 85% for the validation dataset. In neonates <32 weeks' gestation, diaper changes were associated with significant changes in HR and SpO2, and, for neonates ≥32 weeks' gestation, patting and tube feeding were associated with significant changes in HR. The presented system can classify and document the manipulations with high accuracy. Moreover, the study suggests that manipulations impact physiological parameters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNN; IoT; LSTM; electronic medical records; machine learning; neonatal intensive care units; physiological deviations; physiological parameters; streaming server; video monitoring

Year:  2020        PMID: 33375101      PMCID: PMC7822162          DOI: 10.3390/children8010001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Children (Basel)        ISSN: 2227-9067


  31 in total

Review 1.  Global burden of preterm birth.

Authors:  Salimah R Walani
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Racial/Ethnic Disparity in NICU Quality of Care Delivery.

Authors:  Jochen Profit; Jeffrey B Gould; Mihoko Bennett; Benjamin A Goldstein; David Draper; Ciaran S Phibbs; Henry C Lee
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Pain management in newborns.

Authors:  Richard W Hall; Kanwaljeet J S Anand
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.430

4.  Monitoring infants by automatic video processing: A unified approach to motion analysis.

Authors:  Luca Cattani; Davide Alinovi; Gianluigi Ferrari; Riccardo Raheli; Elena Pavlidis; Carlotta Spagnoli; Francesco Pisani
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  A preliminary study of bottom care effects on premature infants' heart rate and oxygen saturation.

Authors:  Wang Yung-Weng; Chang Ying-Ju
Journal:  J Nurs Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.682

6.  Cue-based oral feeding clinical pathway results in earlier attainment of full oral feeding in premature infants.

Authors:  A T Kirk; S C Alder; J D King
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 7.  Information technology in critical care: review of monitoring and data acquisition systems for patient care and research.

Authors:  Michael A De Georgia; Farhad Kaffashi; Frank J Jacono; Kenneth A Loparo
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-02-04

8.  Clinical data needs in the neonatal intensive care unit electronic medical record.

Authors:  Marc A Ellsworth; Tara R Lang; Brian W Pickering; Vitaly Herasevich
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 9.  Efficacy and safety of CPAP in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  A Thukral; M J Sankar; A Chandrasekaran; R Agarwal; V K Paul
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Intelligent ICU for Autonomous Patient Monitoring Using Pervasive Sensing and Deep Learning.

Authors:  Anis Davoudi; Kumar Rohit Malhotra; Benjamin Shickel; Scott Siegel; Seth Williams; Matthew Ruppert; Emel Bihorac; Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti; Patrick J Tighe; Azra Bihorac; Parisa Rashidi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Timing errors and temporal uncertainty in clinical databases-A narrative review.

Authors:  Andrew J Goodwin; Danny Eytan; William Dixon; Sebastian D Goodfellow; Zakary Doherty; Robert W Greer; Alistair McEwan; Mark Tracy; Peter C Laussen; Azadeh Assadi; Mjaye Mazwi
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-08-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.