Literature DB >> 3337344

Comparison of bupivacaine and alkalinized bupivacaine in brachial plexus anesthesia.

M D Bedder1, R Kozody, D B Craig.   

Abstract

To define the effect of alkalinization of bupivacaine 0.5% in subclavian perivascular brachial plexus blockade, the time to onset, time to peak effect, and 6-hour regression of sensory and motor blockade were determined. Sixty physical status ASA I and II patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups and a double-blind design was used: group I (n = 30) received bupivacaine 0.5% (pH, 5.5) 3 mg/kg, while group II (n = 30) received alkalinized bupivacaine 0.5% (pH, 7.05-7.15) 3 mg/kg. Onset and regression of sensory blockade were determined by pinprick in the C4-T2 skin dermatomes, while motor blockade was assessed using a scheme of proximal to distal muscle group paralysis. Time to onset of sensory blockade (group I, 4.0 +/- 1.2 min; group II, 3.6 +/- 0.9 min) and time to peak sensory effect (group I, 17.7 +/- 1.8 min; group II, 16.3 +/- 1.8 min) did not differ significantly between the groups. Similarly, no difference in time to onset of motor blockade (group I, 6.9 +/- 1.7 min; group II, 6.3 +/- 1.5 min) or time to peak motor effect (group I, 18.1 +/- 1.9 min; group II, 15.1 +/- 1.9 min) was observed. Regression of postoperative sensory and motor blockade was similar in both groups. It is concluded that alkalinization of bupivacaine 0.5% solutions does not confer any added clinical advantage in subclavian perivascular brachial plexus blockade when compared with commercially available bupivacaine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3337344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of alkalinized lidocaine solution in brachial plexus blockade.

Authors:  N Kanaya; H Imaizumi; M Matsumoto; A Namiki; K Tsunoda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  [Alkalinization of local anesthetics: theoretically justified but clinically useless].

Authors:  D Chassard; K Berrada; P Boulétreau
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  A Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Carbonated Bupivacaine with Adrenaline for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar.

Authors:  M Shyamala; C Ramesh; V Yuvaraj; V Suresh; R SathyaNarayanan; T S Balaji; M Neil Dominic; B Nithin Joseph Jude
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-05-29

4.  Improved peribulbar anaesthesia with alkalinization and hyaluronidase.

Authors:  J E Roberts; B A MacLeod; R H Hollands
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Alkalinization of local anaesthetics.

Authors:  D H Morison
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Comparison of lidocaine CO2, two per cent lidocaine hydrochloride and pH adjusted lidocaine hydrochloride for caesarean section anesthesia.

Authors:  D J Liepert; M J Douglas; G H McMorland; D R Gambling; J H Kim; P L Ross
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Local bupivacaine for postoperative pain management in thyroidectomized patients: A prospective and controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Ersin Gürkan Dumlu; Mehmet Tokaç; Haydar Öcal; Doğukan Durak; Halil Kara; Mehmet Kılıç; Abdussamed Yalçın
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-09-01

8.  Concentration- and pH-dependent effects of local anesthetics on onset of epidural anesthesia.

Authors:  T Fukuda; S Sato; H Naito
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Alkalinization of lidocaine 2% does not influence the quality of epidural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section.

Authors:  G Gaggero; O Meyer; E Van Gessel; K Rifat
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  A fully implanted drug delivery system for peripheral nerve blocks in behaving animals.

Authors:  Eric A Pohlmeyer; Luke R Jordon; Peter Kim; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.