Literature DB >> 26929560

A Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Carbonated Bupivacaine with Adrenaline for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar.

M Shyamala1, C Ramesh1, V Yuvaraj1, V Suresh1, R SathyaNarayanan1, T S Balaji1, M Neil Dominic1, B Nithin Joseph Jude1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of bupivacaine with adrenaline with that of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline on pain, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar. STUDY
DESIGN: All the patients who underwent surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar and who fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria from 1st June 2013 to 30th June 2014 were included in our study. Patients who were diagnosed as having impacted mandibular third molar were randomly allocated to two groups namely group A (bupivacaine with adrenaline), group B (carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline). Pain during deposition of local anesthetic, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia were compared between the two groups. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis by Chi Square test, Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: The efficacy of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline is more compared with bupivacaine with adrenaline in decreasing pain on deposition of local anesthetic solution and in rapid onset of anesthesia. The duration of anesthesia for carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline and bupivacaine with adrenaline had no significant difference. The use of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline will reduce the patient discomfort both intra-operatively and post-operatively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alkalinisation; Bupicaine; Impacted third molar

Year:  2015        PMID: 26929560      PMCID: PMC4759020          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-015-0791-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  29 in total

1.  Bupivacaine as pre-emptive analgesia in third molar surgery: Randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Sharif Nayyar; C Yates
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 1.651

2.  Alkalinisation of local anaesthetics prescribed for pain relief after surgical decompression of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  H Ozer; S Solak; T Oguz; A Ocguder; T Colakoglu; A Babacan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.118

3.  Comparison of bupivacaine and alkalinized bupivacaine in brachial plexus anesthesia.

Authors:  M D Bedder; R Kozody; D B Craig
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Long-acting analgesic or long-acting local anesthetic in controlling immediate postoperative pain after lower third molar surgery.

Authors:  J B Rosenquist; E Nystrom
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb

Review 5.  Vasoconstrictors in local anesthesia for dentistry.

Authors:  A L Sisk
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1992

6.  A double-blind comparison of 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.75% ropivacaine administered epidurally in humans.

Authors:  J A Katz; D Knarr; P O Bridenbaugh
Journal:  Reg Anesth       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct

7.  The differential effects of bupivacaine and lidocaine on prostaglandin E2 release, cyclooxygenase gene expression and pain in a clinical pain model.

Authors:  Sharon M Gordon; Brian P Chuang; Xiao Min Wang; May A Hamza; Janet S Rowan; Jaime S Brahim; Raymond A Dionne
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Bupivacaine and lignocaine for ophthalmic surgery.

Authors:  E Oji; A Oji
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Comparison of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine anesthetic efficacy in orthodontic extractions: prospective, randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Ashwin Thakare; Kalyani Bhate; Rahul Kathariya
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan       Date:  2014-06-11

10.  Bupivacaine 0.5% versus articaine 4% for the removal of lower third molars. A crossover randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Manuel Sancho-Puchades; Miguel-Ángel Vílchez-Pérez; Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón; Jordi Paredes-García; Leonardo Berini-Aytés; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-05-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Buffered 2% articaine versus non-buffered 4% articaine in maxillary infiltration: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Klinger Souza Amorim; Vanessa Tavares Silva Fontes; Anne Caroline Gercina; Francisco Carlos Groppo; Liane Maciel Almeida Souza
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Tulio Rossi; Murilo Navarro de Oliveira; Maria Tereza Campos Vidigal; Walbert de Andrade Vieira; Cristiano Elias Figueiredo; Cauane Blumenberg; Vinicius Lima de Almeida; Luiz Renato Paranhos; Luciana Butini Oliveira; Walter Luiz Siqueira; Rui Barbosa de Brito Júnior
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Parmanand Dhanrajani; Patrick Chung
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-06-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.