Literature DB >> 33373396

DNA damage induces Yap5-dependent transcription of ECO1/CTF7 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Michael G Mfarej1, Robert V Skibbens1.   

Abstract

Yeast Eco1 (ESCO2 in humans) acetyltransferase converts chromatin-bound cohesins to a DNA tethering state, thereby establishing sister chromatid cohesion. Eco1 establishes cohesion during DNA replication, after which Eco1 is targeted for degradation by SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase. SCF E3 ligase, and sequential phosphorylations that promote Eco1 ubiquitination and degradation, remain active throughout the M phase. In this way, Eco1 protein levels are high during S phase, but remain low throughout the remaining cell cycle. In response to DNA damage during M phase, however, Eco1 activity increases-providing for a new wave of cohesion establishment (termed Damage-Induced Cohesion, or DIC) which is critical for efficient DNA repair. To date, little evidence exists as to the mechanism through which Eco1 activity increases during M phase in response to DNA damage. Possibilities include that either the kinases or E3 ligase, that target Eco1 for degradation, are inhibited in response to DNA damage. Our results reveal instead that the degradation machinery remains fully active during M phase, despite the presence of DNA damage. In testing alternate models through which Eco1 activity increases in response to DNA damage, the results reveal that DNA damage induces new transcription of ECO1 and at a rate that exceeds the rate of Eco1 turnover, providing for rapid accumulation of Eco1 protein. We further show that DNA damage induction of ECO1 transcription is in part regulated by Yap5-a stress-induced transcription factor. Given the role for mutated ESCO2 (homolog of ECO1) in human birth defects, this study highlights the complex nature through which mutation of ESCO2, and defects in ESCO2 regulation, may promote developmental abnormalities and contribute to various diseases including cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33373396      PMCID: PMC7771704          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  82 in total

Review 1.  Evidence that replication fork components catalyze establishment of cohesion between sister chromatids.

Authors:  D R Carson; M F Christman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Sister chromatid cohesion: a simple concept with a complex reality.

Authors:  Itay Onn; Jill M Heidinger-Pauli; Vincent Guacci; Elçin Unal; Douglas E Koshland
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.827

3.  Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method.

Authors:  Thomas D Schmittgen; Kenneth J Livak
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms.

Authors:  Kim Nasmyth; Christian H Haering
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  Predisposition for TMPRSS2-ERG fusion in prostate cancer by variants in DNA repair genes.

Authors:  Manuel Luedeke; Carmen M Linnert; Matthias D Hofer; Harald M Surowy; Antje E Rinckleb; Josef Hoegel; Rainer Kuefer; Mark A Rubin; Walther Vogel; Christiane Maier
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  How many roads lead to cohesinopathies?

Authors:  Rajeswari Banerji; Robert V Skibbens; M Kathryn Iovine
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  The Cdc7 protein kinase is required for origin firing during S phase.

Authors:  K Bousset; J F Diffley
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Yap1 and Skn7 genetically interact with Rad51 in response to oxidative stress and DNA double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Dae Gwan Yi; Myung Ju Kim; Ji Eun Choi; Jihyun Lee; Joohee Jung; Won-Ki Huh; Woo-Hyun Chung
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 7.376

9.  Cdk1-dependent destruction of Eco1 prevents cohesion establishment after S phase.

Authors:  Nicholas A Lyons; David O Morgan
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Variations in dysfunction of sister chromatid cohesion in esco2 mutant zebrafish reflect the phenotypic diversity of Roberts syndrome.

Authors:  Stefanie M Percival; Holly R Thomas; Adam Amsterdam; Andrew J Carroll; Jacqueline A Lees; H Joseph Yost; John M Parant
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 5.758

View more
  2 in total

1.  G1-Cyclin2 (Cln2) promotes chromosome hypercondensation in eco1/ctf7 rad61 null cells during hyperthermic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sean Buskirk; Robert V Skibbens
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.542

2.  Genetically induced redox stress occurs in a yeast model for Roberts syndrome.

Authors:  Michael G Mfarej; Robert V Skibbens
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.542

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.