Literature DB >> 33372367

Multiple stressors determine river ecological status at the European scale: Towards an integrated understanding of river status deterioration.

Jan U Lemm1, Markus Venohr2, Lidija Globevnik3,4, Kostas Stefanidis5,6, Yiannis Panagopoulos5,6, Jos van Gils7, Leo Posthuma8,9, Peter Kristensen10, Christian K Feld1,11, Judith Mahnkopf2, Daniel Hering1,11, Sebastian Birk1,11.   

Abstract

The biota of European rivers are affected by a wide range of stressors impairing water quality and hydro-morphology. Only about 40% of Europe's rivers reach 'good ecological status', a target set by the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) and indicated by the biota. It is yet unknown how the different stressors in concert impact ecological status and how the relationship between stressors and status differs between river types. We linked the intensity of seven stressors to recently measured ecological status data for more than 50,000 sub-catchment units (covering almost 80% of Europe's surface area), which were distributed among 12 broad river types. Stressor data were either derived from remote sensing data (extent of urban and agricultural land use in the riparian zone) or modelled (alteration of mean annual flow and of base flow, total phosphorous load, total nitrogen load and mixture toxic pressure, a composite metric for toxic substances), while data on ecological status were taken from national statutory reporting of the second WFD River Basin Management Plans for the years 2010-2015. We used Boosted Regression Trees to link ecological status to stressor intensities. The stressors explained on average 61% of deviance in ecological status for the 12 individual river types, with all seven stressors contributing considerably to this explanation. On average, 39.4% of the deviance was explained by altered hydro-morphology (morphology: 23.2%; hydrology: 16.2%), 34.4% by nutrient enrichment and 26.2% by toxic substances. More than half of the total deviance was explained by stressor interaction, with nutrient enrichment and toxic substances interacting most frequently and strongly. Our results underline that the biota of all European river types are determined by co-occurring and interacting multiple stressors, lending support to the conclusion that fundamental management strategies at the catchment scale are required to reach the ambitious objective of good ecological status of surface waters.
© 2020 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ecological status; hydrology; nutrients; riparian land use; river types; stressor interactions; toxic substances

Year:  2021        PMID: 33372367     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  8 in total

1.  Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition.

Authors:  Philip R Kaufmann; Robert M Hughes; Steven G Paulsen; David V Peck; Curt W Seeliger; Tom Kincaid; Richard M Mitchell
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 6.263

2.  Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and rivers, Part 1: Geoclimatic controls and anthropogenic alteration.

Authors:  Philip R Kaufmann; Robert M Hughes; Steven G Paulsen; David V Peck; Curt W Seeliger; Marc H Weber; Richard M Mitchell
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 6.263

3.  The EU chemicals strategy for sustainability: an opportunity to develop new approaches for hazard and risk assessment.

Authors:  Stefan Scholz; Werner Brack; Beate I Escher; Jörg Hackermüller; Matthias Liess; Martin von Bergen; Lukas Y Wick; Ana C Zenclussen; Rolf Altenburger
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 6.168

4.  Anthropogenic Stressors in Upland Rivers: Aquatic Macrophyte Responses. A Case Study from Bulgaria.

Authors:  Gana Gecheva; Karin Pall; Milcho Todorov; Ivan Traykov; Nikolina Gribacheva; Silviya Stankova; Sebastian Birk
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09

5.  One planet: one health. A call to support the initiative on a global science-policy body on chemicals and waste.

Authors:  Werner Brack; Damia Barcelo Culleres; Alistair B A Boxall; Hélène Budzinski; Sara Castiglioni; Adrian Covaci; Valeria Dulio; Beate I Escher; Peter Fantke; Faith Kandie; Despo Fatta-Kassinos; Félix J Hernández; Klara Hilscherová; Juliane Hollender; Henner Hollert; Annika Jahnke; Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern; Stuart J Khan; Andreas Kortenkamp; Klaus Kümmerer; Brice Lalonde; Marja H Lamoree; Yves Levi; Pablo Antonio Lara Martín; Cassiana C Montagner; Christian Mougin; Titus Msagati; Jörg Oehlmann; Leo Posthuma; Malcolm Reid; Martin Reinhard; Susan D Richardson; Pawel Rostkowski; Emma Schymanski; Flurina Schneider; Jaroslav Slobodnik; Yasuyuki Shibata; Shane Allen Snyder; Fernando Fabriz Sodré; Ivana Teodorovic; Kevin V Thomas; Gisela A Umbuzeiro; Pham Hung Viet; Karina Gin Yew-Hoong; Xiaowei Zhang; Ettore Zuccato
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.893

6.  Ecological River Health Assessment Using Multi-Metric Models in an Asian Temperate Region with Land Use/Land Cover as the Primary Factor Regulating Nutrients, Organic Matter, and Fish Composition.

Authors:  Md Mamun; Namsrai Jargal; Usman Atique; Kwang-Guk An
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Are experiment sample sizes adequate to detect biologically important interactions between multiple stressors?

Authors:  Benjamin J Burgess; Michelle C Jackson; David J Murrell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Probability maps of anthropogenic impacts affecting ecological status in European rivers.

Authors:  Olga Vigiak; Angel Udias; Alberto Pistocchi; Michela Zanni; Alberto Aloe; Bruna Grizzetti
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 4.958

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.