Literature DB >> 33372202

Analysis of acute-phase toxicities of intensity-modulated proton therapy using a model-based approach in pharyngeal cancer patients.

Koichi Yasuda1, Hideki Minatogawa1,2, Yasuhiro Dekura1,3, Seishin Takao4, Masaya Tamura4, Nayuta Tsushima5, Takayoshi Suzuki5, Satoshi Kano5, Takatsugu Mizumachi5, Takashi Mori6, Kentaro Nishioka3, Motoyasu Shido1, Norio Katoh2, Hiroshi Taguchi1, Noriyuki Fujima7, Rikiya Onimaru2, Isao Yokota8, Keiji Kobashi4,3, Shinichi Shimizu3, Akihiro Homma5, Hiroki Shirato2, Hidefumi Aoyama2.   

Abstract

Pharyngeal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) using a model-based approach were retrospectively reviewed, and acute toxicities were analyzed. From June 2016 to March 2019, 15 pharyngeal (7 naso-, 5 oro- and 3 hypo-pharyngeal) cancer patients received IMPT with robust optimization. Simulation plans for IMPT and intensity-modulated X-ray therapy (IMXT) were generated before treatment. We also reviewed 127 pharyngeal cancer patients with IMXT in the same treatment period. In the simulation planning comparison, all of the normal-tissue complication probability values for dysphagia, dysgeusia, tube-feeding dependence and xerostomia were lower for IMPT than for IMXT in the 15 patients. After completing IMPT, 13 patients completed the evaluation, and 12 of these patients had a complete response. The proportions of patients who experienced grade 2 or worse acute toxicities in the IMPT and IMXT cohorts were 21.4 and 56.5% for dysphagia (P < 0.05), 46.7 and 76.3% for dysgeusia (P < 0.05), 73.3 and 62.8% for xerostomia (P = 0.43), 73.3 and 90.6% for mucositis (P = 0.08) and 66.7 and 76.4% for dermatitis (P = 0.42), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that IMPT was independently associated with a lower rate of grade 2 or worse dysphagia and dysgeusia. After propensity score matching, 12 pairs of IMPT and IMXT patients were selected. Dysphagia was also statistically lower in IMPT than in IMXT (P < 0.05). IMPT using a model-based approach may have clinical benefits for acute dysphagia.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IMPT; pharyngeal cancer; robust optimization

Year:  2021        PMID: 33372202      PMCID: PMC7948838          DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rraa130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  20 in total

1.  Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Xiaodong Zhang; Yupeng Li; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A treatment planning comparison of 3D conformal therapy, intensity modulated photon therapy and proton therapy for treatment of advanced head and neck tumours.

Authors:  L Cozzi; A Fogliata; A Lomax; A Bolsi
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) for patients with oropharynx cancer - A case matched analysis.

Authors:  Pierre Blanchard; Adam S Garden; G Brandon Gunn; David I Rosenthal; William H Morrison; Mike Hernandez; Joseph Crutison; Jack J Lee; Rong Ye; C David Fuller; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Kate A Hutcheson; Emma B Holliday; Nikhil G Thaker; Erich M Sturgis; Merrill S Kies; X Ronald Zhu; Radhe Mohan; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Volume and dosimetric changes and initial clinical experience of a two-step adaptive intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) scheme for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Tamaki Nishi; Yasumasa Nishimura; Toru Shibata; Masaya Tamura; Naohiro Nishigaito; Masahiko Okumura
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Comparative analysis of acute toxicities and patient reported outcomes between intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Gohar S Manzar; Scott C Lester; David M Routman; William S Harmsen; Molly M Petersen; Jeff A Sloan; Daniel W Mundy; Ashley E Hunzeker; Adam C Amundson; Jeffrey L Anderson; Samir H Patel; Yolanda I Garces; Michele Y Halyard; Lisa A McGee; Michelle A Neben-Wittich; Daniel J Ma; Steven J Frank; Thomas J Whitaker; Robert L Foote
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.

Authors:  Macarena Cubillos-Mesías; Michael Baumann; Esther G C Troost; Fabian Lohaus; Steffen Löck; Christian Richter; Kristin Stützer
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Prospective study to evaluate the safety of the world-first spot-scanning dedicated, small 360-degree gantry, synchrotron-based proton beam therapy system.

Authors:  Kentaro Nishioka; Anussara Prayongrat; Kota Ono; Shunsuke Onodera; Takayuki Hashimoto; Norio Katoh; Tetsuya Inoue; Rumiko Kinoshita; Koichi Yasuda; Takashi Mori; Rikiya Onimaru; Hiroki Shirato; Shinichi Shimizu
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Systematic review and meta-analyses of intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus conventional two-dimensional and/or or three-dimensional radiotherapy in curative-intent management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tejpal Gupta; Sadhana Kannan; Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar; Jai Prakash Agarwal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of an automated knowledge based treatment planning system for head and neck.

Authors:  Jerome Krayenbuehl; Ian Norton; Gabriela Studer; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Robust Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Increases Estimated Clinical Benefit in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Lisanne V van Dijk; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Bennie ten Haken; Hans Paul van der Laan; Aart A van 't Veld; Johannes A Langendijk; Erik W Korevaar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Head and Neck Cancer Types and Risks of Cervical-Cranial Vascular Complications within 5 Years after Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Chi-Hung Liu; Bing-Shen Huang; Chien-Yu Lin; Chih-Hua Yeh; Tsong-Hai Lee; Hsiu-Chuan Wu; Chien-Hung Chang; Ting-Yu Chang; Kuo-Lun Huang; Jian-Lin Jiang; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Yeu-Jhy Chang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.