Literature DB >> 32234612

Comparative analysis of acute toxicities and patient reported outcomes between intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer.

Gohar S Manzar1, Scott C Lester2, David M Routman2, William S Harmsen3, Molly M Petersen3, Jeff A Sloan3, Daniel W Mundy2, Ashley E Hunzeker2, Adam C Amundson2, Jeffrey L Anderson2, Samir H Patel4, Yolanda I Garces2, Michele Y Halyard4, Lisa A McGee4, Michelle A Neben-Wittich2, Daniel J Ma2, Steven J Frank5, Thomas J Whitaker2, Robert L Foote6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: IMPT improves normal tissue sparing compared to VMAT in treating oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Our aim was to assess if this translates into clinical benefits.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: OPC patients treated with definitive or adjuvant IMPT or VMAT from 2013 to 2018 were included. All underwent prospective assessment using patient-reported-outcomes (PROs) (EORTC-QLQ-H&N35) and provider-assessed toxicities (CTCAEv4.03). End-of-treatment and pretreatment scores were compared. PEG-tube use, hospitalization, and narcotic use were retrospectively collected. Statistical analysis used the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test with propensity matching for PROs/provider-assessed toxicities, and t-tests for other clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: 46 IMPT and 259 VMAT patients were included; median follow-up was 12 months (IMPT) and 30 months (VMAT). Baseline characteristics were balanced except for age (p = 0.04, IMPT were older) and smoking (p < 0.01, 10.9% IMPT >20PYs, 29.3% VMAT). IMPT was associated with lower PEG placement (OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.12-0.59; p = 0.001) and less hospitalization ≤60 days post-RT (OR = 0.21; 95% CI:0.07-0.6, p < 0.001), with subgroup analysis revealing strongest benefits in patients treated definitively or with concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). IMPT was associated with a relative risk reduction of 22.3% for end-of-treatment narcotic use. Patients reported reduced cough and dysgeusia with IMPT (p < 0.05); patients treated definitively or with CRT also reported feeling less ill, reduced feeding tube use, and better swallow. Provider-assessed toxicities demonstrated less pain and mucositis with IMPT, but more mucosal infection.
CONCLUSION: IMPT is associated with improved PROs, reduced PEG-tube placement, hospitalization, and narcotic requirements. Mucositis, dysphagia, and pain were decreased with IMPT. Benefits were predominantly seen in patients treated definitively or with CRT.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute toxicity; IMPT; Intensity modulated proton therapy; Oropharyngeal cancer; Patient-reported outcomes; Proton therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32234612     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  10 in total

Review 1.  Dental management in head and neck cancers: from intensity-modulated radiotherapy with photons to proton therapy.

Authors:  Sabah Falek; Rajesh Regmi; Joel Herault; Melanie Dore; Anthony Vela; Pauline Dutheil; Cyril Moignier; Pierre-Yves Marcy; Julien Drouet; Arnaud Beddok; Noah E Letwin; Joel Epstein; Upendra Parvathaneni; Juliette Thariat
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.359

Review 2.  Proton Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Early Clinical Experience and Current Challenges.

Authors:  Sandra Nuyts; Heleen Bollen; Sweet Ping Ng; June Corry; Avraham Eisbruch; William M Mendenhall; Robert Smee; Primoz Strojan; Wai Tong Ng; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Proton Therapy for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancers of the Head and Neck: a De-Intensification Strategy.

Authors:  Nicolette Taku; Li Wang; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn; William H Morrison; C David Fuller; Jack Phan; Jay P Reddy; Amy C Moreno; Michael T Spiotto; Gregory Chronowski; Shalin J Shah; Lauren L Mayo; Neil D Gross; Renata Ferrarotto; X Ronald Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04

4.  Analysis of acute-phase toxicities of intensity-modulated proton therapy using a model-based approach in pharyngeal cancer patients.

Authors:  Koichi Yasuda; Hideki Minatogawa; Yasuhiro Dekura; Seishin Takao; Masaya Tamura; Nayuta Tsushima; Takayoshi Suzuki; Satoshi Kano; Takatsugu Mizumachi; Takashi Mori; Kentaro Nishioka; Motoyasu Shido; Norio Katoh; Hiroshi Taguchi; Noriyuki Fujima; Rikiya Onimaru; Isao Yokota; Keiji Kobashi; Shinichi Shimizu; Akihiro Homma; Hiroki Shirato; Hidefumi Aoyama
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Knowledge-Based Planning for Robustly Optimized Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Yihang Xu; Jonathan Cyriac; Mariluz De Ornelas; Elizabeth Bossart; Kyle Padgett; Michael Butkus; Tejan Diwanji; Stuart Samuels; Michael A Samuels; Nesrin Dogan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Proton Therapy Outcomes for Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma: Proton Collaborative Group Analysis.

Authors:  James E Han; Alicia Lozano; Shaakir Hasan; J Isabelle Choi; Arpit M Chhabra; Henry Tsai; Nasiruddin Mohammed; Samir Patel; Sanford Katz; John H Chang; Charles B Simone; Robert H Press
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2022-07-06

7.  Work Outcomes after Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) versus Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy (IMRT) for Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Grace L Smith; Shuangshuang Fu; Matthew S Ning; Diem-Khanh Nguyen; Paul M Busse; Robert L Foote; Adam S Garden; Gary B Gunn; Clifton D Fuller; William H Morrison; Gregory M Chronowski; Shalin J Shah; Lauren L Mayo; Jack Phan; Jay P Reddy; James W Snider; Samir H Patel; Sanford R Katz; Alexander Lin; Nasiruddin Mohammed; Roi Dagan; Nancy Y Lee; David I Rosenthal; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-25

8.  Toxicity Profiles and Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy vs Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Xingzhe Li; Sarin Kitpanit; Anna Lee; Dennis Mah; Kevin Sine; Eric J Sherman; Lara A Dunn; Loren S Michel; James Fetten; Kaveh Zakeri; Yao Yu; Linda Chen; Jung Julie Kang; Daphna Y Gelblum; Sean M McBride; Chiaojung J Tsai; Nadeem Riaz; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-06-01

9.  Cost-Effectiveness Models of Proton Therapy for Head and Neck: Evaluating Quality and Methods to Date.

Authors:  Danmeng Huang; Steven J Frank; Vivek Verma; Nikhil G Thaker; Eric D Brooks; Matthew B Palmer; Ross F Harrison; Ashish A Deshmukh; Matthew S Ning
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-25

10.  Clinical Review of Proton Therapy in the Treatment of Unilateral Head and Neck Cancers.

Authors:  Robert H Press; Richard L Bakst; Sonam Sharma; Rafi Kabarriti; Madhur K Garg; Brian Yeh; Daphna Y Gelbum; Shaakir Hasan; J Isabelle Choi; Chris A Barker; Arpit M Chhabra; Charles B Simone; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.