| Literature DB >> 33372172 |
Sheng-Huo Zhou1, Shu-Ting Huang1, Ning Xu1, Liang-Wang Chen1, Qiang Chen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an effective treatment for coronary heart disease. However, a lack of cardiac rehabilitation and continuous nursing management leads to repeated patient hospitalizations. Long-term systematic rehabilitation and nursing management after discharge are key to ensuring quality of treatment and patient quality of life. This study aimed to explore the application of the WeChat platform in continuous nursing after PCI. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a retrospective case-control study. The clinical data of 63 patients in our cardiac center who underwent PCI between June 2017 and January 2018 were recorded. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the continuous nursing through the WeChat platform (intervention) group and the conventional nursing (control) group. The Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) were used as the evaluation tools. RESULTS The SAQ scores in all 5 SAQ dimensions in the continuous nursing group were significantly higher than those of the control group at the 1-year follow-up. Scores on the SAS and SDS scales at 1-year follow-up were significantly better in the intervention group than in the control group. The SAS and SDS scores in both groups were better at the 1-year follow-up, but the difference was statistically significant in the continuous nursing group and not in the control group. CONCLUSIONS Using the WeChat platform can make continuous nursing more convenient and effective for patients after PCI. It may reduce the occurrence of complications, relieve patient depression and anxiety, and improve patient quality of life.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33372172 PMCID: PMC7777148 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.925444
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1CONSORT diagram of patient participation.
Comparison of baseline clinical and demographic data between the 2 groups.
| Item | Intervention group | Control group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 31 | 32 | |
| Age (year) | 55.7±9.6 | 57.5±10.8 | 0.716 |
| Male/Female | 21/10 | 23/9 | 0.721 |
| Hypertension | 13 | 15 | 0.693 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 10 | 12 | 0.663 |
| Hyperlipemia | 6 | 6 | 0.951 |
| Smoking | 8 | 10 | 0.845 |
| Record of formal schooling | |||
| Junior high school and below | 24 | 26 | 0.916 |
| Senior middle school | 5 | 4 | |
| University and above | 2 | 2 | |
| Place of residence: rural/urban | 22/9 | 24/8 | 0.712 |
Diagnostic criteria of hypertension: 3 Non-same day measurement of blood pressure, systolic blood pressure is more than 140 mmHg, and/or diastolic blood pressure is more than 90 mmHg. Diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus: Fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L, random blood glucose or 2 h blood glucose in oral glucose tolerance test ≥11.1 mmol/L. Diagnostic criteria of hyperlipemia: Triglyceride ≥2.27 mmol/L, total cholesterol ≥6.19 mmol/L.
Comparison of SAQ scores between the 2 groups at discharge.
| Item | Intervention group | Control group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical limitation | 63.1±9.2 | 65.3±10.7 | 0.863 |
| Angina stability | 53.2±8.4 | 54.1±9.9 | 0.836 |
| Angina frequency | 60.5±10.5 | 61.4±11.7 | 0.785 |
| Satisfaction with treatment | 75.2±11.2 | 73.6±12.5 | 0.853 |
| Perception of disease | 65.3±12.5 | 63.5±11.4 | 0.811 |
Comparison of SAQ Scores Between the 2 Groups 1 Year After PCI.
| Item | Intervention group | Control group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical limitation | 82.5±12.8 | 71.5±10.8 | 0.036 |
| Angina stability | 78.5±10.5 | 63.8±9.3 | 0.031 |
| Angina frequency | 81.4±12.5 | 68.9±11.6 | 0.029 |
| Satisfaction with treatment | 95.1±13.5 | 82.4±12.1 | 0.016 |
| Perception of disease | 89.1±11.2 | 77.3±13.2 | 0.021 |
Comparison of psychological state before and after nursing intervention.
| Item | Intervention group | Control group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SDS score | |||
| Preoperation | 54.8±11.5 | 56.2±12.8 | 0.815 |
| 1 year after PCI | 41.6±8.7 | 50.3±13.3 | 0.028 |
| The SAS score | |||
| Preoperation | 65.5±13.6 | 63.8±15.3 | 0.886 |
| 1 year after PCI | 47.6±10.9 | 56.9±13.8 | 0.022 |
P<0.05, preoperation compared with 1 year after PCI.