Literature DB >> 33370676

Environmental regulation benefits for whom? Heterogeneous effects of the intensity of the environmental regulation on employment in China.

Shihu Zhong1, Yunjun Xiong2, Guocheng Xiang3.   

Abstract

As environmental pollution in China has deteriorated in the recent years, intensifying environmental regulation has become a necessity for the Chinese government. But the debate persists among the academic circles and the government over whether a double dividend, reducing pollution emission and boosting employment, of environmental regulations exists. This study differentiates, based on Cobb-Douglas production function, the variance between high- and low-skilled labour and constructs theoretical models to analyse heterogeneous effects of environmental regulation intensity on the employment of labour with varied skills. The model finds that implementing environmental regulation will generate 'compliance cost effect' and 'innovation offset effect'. The compliance cost effect will promote the employment of high-skilled labour while suppressing that of the low-skilled labour. The innovation offset effect, however, will facilitate the employment for both high-skilled and low-skilled labour. Therefore, the employment of high-skilled labour will grow along with the intensification of environmental regulation while that of the low-skilled labour will decline first and then rebound, showcasing a U-shaped curve. The empirical research results based on the provincial dynamic panel data from 2004 to 2018 in China confirm the theoretical analysis. Moreover, we find spatial spillover effects of environmental regulation on employment, with high-skilled labour being more sensitive to changes in environmental regulation. One percentage point increase in environmental regulation in neighbouring regions will cause 0.072% employment decline in high-skilled labour while that of low-skilled labour will only decrease 0.033%. The conclusions of this study verify that dividend in employment growth for both high-skilled and low-skilled labour can be realised along with intensification of environmental regulation, which carries significant guiding implications for policy-making for environmental regulation in China.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Double dividend; Dynamic spatial durbin model; Employment; Environmental regulation intensity; High-skilled labour; Low-skilled labour

Year:  2020        PMID: 33370676     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  3 in total

1.  Renewable energy technology innovation and inclusive low-carbon development from the perspective of spatiotemporal consistency.

Authors:  Long Xin; Hui Sun; Xuechao Xia
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 5.190

2.  Can Green Economy and Ecological Welfare Achieve Synergistic Development? The Perspective of the "Two Mountains" Theory.

Authors:  Lindong Ma; Yuanxiao Hong; Xihui Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Green technology innovation and carbon emissions nexus in China: Does industrial structure upgrading matter?

Authors:  Pengfei Gao; Yadong Wang; Yi Zou; Xufeng Su; Xinghui Che; Xiaodong Yang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.