| Literature DB >> 33369618 |
Lun Hua1,2,3, Jing Li1,2,3, Bin Feng1,2,3, Dandan Jiang1,2,3, Xuemei Jiang1,2,3, Ting Luo4, Lianqiang Che1,2,3, Shengyu Xu1,2,3, Yan Lin1,2,3, Zhengfeng Fang1,2,3, Yong Zhuo1,2,3.
Abstract
Obesity and related metabolic disorders have become epidemic diseases. Intermittent fasting has been shown to promote adipose tissue angiogenesis and have an anti-obesity feature; however, the mechanisms of how intermittent fasting modulates adipose tissues angiogenesis are poorly understood. We investigated the effect of fasting on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in white adipose tissues (WAT) and the function of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) in 1-time fasting and long-term intermittent fasting-induced VEGF expression. In the current study, fasting induced a selective and drastic elevation of VEGF levels in WAT, which did not occur in interscapular brown adipose tissue and liver. The fasting-induced Vegfa expression occurred predominantly in mature adipocytes, but not in the stromal vascular fraction in epididymal WAT and inguinal WAT (iWAT). Furthermore, a single bolus of recombinant mouse FGF21 injection increased VEGF levels in WAT. Long-term intermittent fasting for 16 weeks increased WAT angiogenesis, iWAT browning, and improved insulin resistance and inflammation, but the effect was blunted in FGF21 liver-specific knockout mice. In summary, these data suggest that FGF21 is a potent regulator of VEGF levels in WAT. The interorgan FGF21 signaling-induced WAT angiogenesis by VEGF could be a potential new therapeutic target in combination with obesity-related metabolic disorders.Entities:
Keywords: FGF21; VEGF; angiogenesis; fasting; intermittent fasting
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33369618 PMCID: PMC7814301 DOI: 10.1210/endocr/bqaa244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endocrinology ISSN: 0013-7227 Impact factor: 5.051
Figure 1.Fasting induced adipose-specific VEGF expression and liver Twelve-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were either fed with chow diets ad libitum or fasting for various time periods (6 h, 12 h, and 24 h) as indicated. (A) Serum VEGF levels and (B) the mRNA expression of Vegfa in epididymal WAT (eWAT) (B), subcutaneous iWAT (C), interscapular BAT (D), liver (E), and muscle (F) as determined by real-time PCR analysis. The protein levels of VEGF in eWAT (G) and iWAT (H) as determined by western blot; (I) serum FGF21 levels as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; and real-time transcription PCR analysis for Fgf21 mRNA expression levels of liver (J), eWAT (K), iWAT (L), BAT (M), and muscle (N). Serum FFA (O) and ketone bodies (P) levels. Data are mean ± SEM; n = 6/group. Statistical significance was evaluated by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons to determine differences between each group. Labeled means without a common letter differ, P < 0.05. Abbreviations: BAT, brown adipose tissue; eWAT, epididymal white adipose tissue; FFA, free fatty acid; FGF21, fibroblast growth factor 21; iWAT, inguinal white adipose tissue; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Figure 2.FGF21 promoted expression and accumulation of VEGF in WAT. The relative mRNA abundance of Vegfa in tissue, adipocytes and stromal vascular fraction isolated from eWAT (A) and iWAT (B) at fed or 24 h of fasting. Twelve-week-old male WT (FGF21fl/fl) and FGF21 LKO mice were fasted for 24 h; the Vegfa mRNA expression in eWAT and iWAT (C). Quantitative reverse transcription PCR analysis for Vegfa mRNA expression in eWAT (D), iWAT (E), and BAT (F) at the indicated time points after tail vein injection of rmFGF21 (1 mg/kg). The protein levels of VEGF at various time points after mice receiving a delivery of rmFGF21 with tail vein injection in eWAT (G) and iWAT (H). n = 6/group. Statistical significance was evaluated by unpaired Student’s t test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, versus control; labeled means without a common letter differ, P < 0.05. Abbreviation: SCV, stromal vascular fraction.
Figure 3.Intermittent fasting induced adipose-VEGF expression and angiogenesis depend on liver FGF21 signaling. Mice were fed with HFD ad libitum or time-restricted access to food for 16 weeks. HA means WT mice eating a high-fat diet with ad libitum, HT means WT mice eating a high-fat diet with time-restricted access to food, KOHA means FGF21 LKO mice eating a high-fat diet with ad libitum, KOHT means FGF21 LKO mice eating a HFD with time-restricted access to food. (A) Schematic illustration of the experimental design. (B) Body weight. (C) Representative HT mice were remarkably leaner than the HA mice. (D) Body composition was evaluated by EchoMRI. (E) Serum FGF21 levels as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. (F) A representative macroscopic image illustrating increased vascularization in iWAT of HT mice, compared to HA mice but not in FGF21 LKO mice. (G) Real-time quantitative PCR analysis for mRNA expression levels of Vegfa in eWAT and iWAT. Representative protein levels for VEGF in eWAT (G) and iWAT (I). (J) Immunofluorescence staining of CD31 (scale bar, 100 mm) in eWAT and iWAT, illustrating IF increased vascularization in WT mice but not in FGF21 LKO mice. Data are mean ± SEM; n = 6–8/group. Statistical significance was evaluated by the 2-way ANOVA test and the Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons to determine differences between each group. HA vs HT, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; labeled means without a common letter differ, P < 0.05.
Figure 4.Liver-FGF21 is required for intermittent fasting-induced metabolic benefits. Mice were fed with HFD ad libitum or time-restricted access to food for 16 weeks. (A) O2 consumption (VO2), (B) CO2 production (VCO2). (C and D) GTT shows normal glucose tolerance in HT mice but not for FGF21 LKO mice. (E) Serum insulin levels. real-time quantitative PCR analysis for mRNA expression levels of browning related genes (F), UCP-1 protein level (G) and immunohistochemical staining (H) of UCP-1 in iWAT. (I) The expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Tnfα and IL1-β) in eWAT. (J) A working model of dietary intake regulating iWAT browning via FGF21 signaling. Data are mean ± SEM; n = 6–8/group. Statistical significance was evaluated by the 2-way ANOVA test and the Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons to determine differences between each group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; labeled means without a common letter differ, P < 0.05.
List of primers used
| Name | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
|
| GGCTGTATTCCCCTCCATCG | CCAGTTGGTAACAATGCCATGT |
|
| GCCAAAGTCCGCCTTCAGAT | CAGTTTCGGCAATCCTTCTGTT |
|
| CTGCTGGGGGTCTACCAAG | CTGCGCCTACCACTGTTCC |
|
| TATGGAGTGACATAGAGTGTGCT | CCACTTCAATCCACCCAGAAAG |
|
| GCTTACGGGGTAGCCTTTGA | TGTAGGTTATAGCTGAAGGGGC |
|
| TCACCTTGTCCCAGATCACTC | CTGAGGTACATGAGCGAGGAC |
|
| CTGTAACGATGAAGCCCTGGAG | TGGTGAGGTTTGATCCGCAT |
|
| CAGCCTCTTCTCATTCCTGC | GGTCTGGGCCATAGAACTGA |
|
| CTGGTGTGTGACGTTCCCATTA | CCGACAGCACGAGGCTTT |