Barbara D Lam1, Fabienne Bourgeois2, Zhiyong J Dong1, Sigall K Bell1. 1. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Open notes invite patients and families to read ambulatory visit notes through the patient portal. Little is known about the extent to which they identify and speak up about perceived errors. Understanding the barriers to speaking up can inform quality improvements. OBJECTIVE: To describe patient and family attitudes, experiences, and barriers related to speaking up about perceived serious note errors. METHODS: Mixed method analysis of a 2016 electronic survey of patients and families at 2 northeast US academic medical centers. Participants had active patient portal accounts and at least 1 note available in the preceding 12 months. RESULTS: 6913 adult patients (response rate 28%) and 3672 pediatric families (response rate 17%) completed the survey. In total, 8724/9392 (93%) agreed that reporting mistakes improves patient safety. Among 8648 participants who read a note, 1434 (17%) perceived ≥1 mistake. 627/1434 (44%) reported the mistake was serious and 342/627 (56%) contacted their provider. Participants who self-identified as Black or African American, Asian, "other," or "multiple" race(s) (OR 0.50; 95% CI (0.26,0.97)) or those who reported poorer health (OR 0.58; 95% CI (0.37,0.90)) were each less likely to speak up than white or healthier respondents, respectively. The most common barriers to speaking up were not knowing how to report a mistake (61%) and avoiding perception as a "troublemaker" (34%). Qualitative analysis of 476 free-text suggestions revealed practical recommendations and proposed innovations for partnering with patients and families. CONCLUSIONS: About half of patients and families who perceived a serious mistake in their notes reported it. Identified barriers demonstrate modifiable issues such as establishing clear mechanisms for reporting and more challenging issues such as creating a supportive culture. Respondents offered new ideas for engaging patients and families in improving note accuracy. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association 2020.
BACKGROUND: Open notes invite patients and families to read ambulatory visit notes through the patient portal. Little is known about the extent to which they identify and speak up about perceived errors. Understanding the barriers to speaking up can inform quality improvements. OBJECTIVE: To describe patient and family attitudes, experiences, and barriers related to speaking up about perceived serious note errors. METHODS: Mixed method analysis of a 2016 electronic survey of patients and families at 2 northeast US academic medical centers. Participants had active patient portal accounts and at least 1 note available in the preceding 12 months. RESULTS: 6913 adult patients (response rate 28%) and 3672 pediatric families (response rate 17%) completed the survey. In total, 8724/9392 (93%) agreed that reporting mistakes improves patient safety. Among 8648 participants who read a note, 1434 (17%) perceived ≥1 mistake. 627/1434 (44%) reported the mistake was serious and 342/627 (56%) contacted their provider. Participants who self-identified as Black or African American, Asian, "other," or "multiple" race(s) (OR 0.50; 95% CI (0.26,0.97)) or those who reported poorer health (OR 0.58; 95% CI (0.37,0.90)) were each less likely to speak up than white or healthier respondents, respectively. The most common barriers to speaking up were not knowing how to report a mistake (61%) and avoiding perception as a "troublemaker" (34%). Qualitative analysis of 476 free-text suggestions revealed practical recommendations and proposed innovations for partnering with patients and families. CONCLUSIONS: About half of patients and families who perceived a serious mistake in their notes reported it. Identified barriers demonstrate modifiable issues such as establishing clear mechanisms for reporting and more challenging issues such as creating a supportive culture. Respondents offered new ideas for engaging patients and families in improving note accuracy. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association 2020.
Entities:
Keywords:
ambulatory care; health information technology; information transparency; patient safety; speaking up
Authors: Thomas H Gallagher; Michelle M Mello; Wendy Levinson; Matthew K Wynia; Ajit K Sachdeva; Lois Snyder Sulmasy; Robert D Truog; James Conway; Kathleen Mazor; Alan Lembitz; Sigall K Bell; Lauge Sokol-Hessner; Jo Shapiro; Ann-Louise Puopolo; Robert Arnold Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kimberly A Fisher; Kelly M Smith; Thomas H Gallagher; Jim C Huang; James C Borton; Kathleen M Mazor Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2018-09-29 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Alisa Khan; Maitreya Coffey; Katherine P Litterer; Jennifer D Baird; Stephannie L Furtak; Briana M Garcia; Michele A Ashland; Sharon Calaman; Nicholas C Kuzma; Jennifer K O'Toole; Aarti Patel; Glenn Rosenbluth; Lauren A Destino; Jennifer L Everhart; Brian P Good; Jennifer H Hepps; Anuj K Dalal; Stuart R Lipsitz; Catherine S Yoon; Katherine R Zigmont; Rajendu Srivastava; Amy J Starmer; Theodore C Sectish; Nancy D Spector; Daniel C West; Christopher P Landrigan; Brenda K Allair; Claire Alminde; Wilma Alvarado-Little; Marisa Atsatt; Megan E Aylor; James F Bale; Dorene Balmer; Kevin T Barton; Carolyn Beck; Zia Bismilla; Rebecca L Blankenburg; Debra Chandler; Amanda Choudhary; Eileen Christensen; Sally Coghlan-McDonald; F Sessions Cole; Elizabeth Corless; Sharon Cray; Roxi Da Silva; Devesh Dahale; Benard Dreyer; Amanda S Growdon; LeAnn Gubler; Amy Guiot; Roben Harris; Helen Haskell; Irene Kocolas; Elizabeth Kruvand; Michele Marie Lane; Kathleen Langrish; Christy J W Ledford; Kheyandra Lewis; Joseph O Lopreiato; Christopher G Maloney; Amanda Mangan; Peggy Markle; Fernando Mendoza; Dale Ann Micalizzi; Vineeta Mittal; Maria Obermeyer; Katherine A O'Donnell; Mary Ottolini; Shilpa J Patel; Rita Pickler; Jayne Elizabeth Rogers; Lee M Sanders; Kimberly Sauder; Samir S Shah; Meesha Sharma; Arabella Simpkin; Anupama Subramony; E Douglas Thompson; Laura Trueman; Tanner Trujillo; Michael P Turmelle; Cindy Warnick; Chelsea Welch; Andrew J White; Matthew F Wien; Ariel S Winn; Stephanie Wintch; Michael Wolf; H Shonna Yin; Clifton E Yu Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Kimberly A Fisher; Thomas H Gallagher; Kelly M Smith; Yanhua Zhou; Sybil Crawford; Azraa Amroze; Kathleen M Mazor Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Mita Sanghavi Goel; Tiffany L Brown; Adam Williams; Romana Hasnain-Wynia; Jason A Thompson; David W Baker Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-05-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Martina A Clarke; Elizabeth R Lyden; Jihyun Ma; Keyonna M King; Mohammad Mo Siahpush; Tzeyu Michaud; Regina E Idoate; Athena K Ramos Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2020-08-24
Authors: Manan Shah; Derek Shu; V B Surya Prasath; Yizhao Ni; Andrew H Schapiro; Kevin R Dufendach Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2021-09-08 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Rachael Lear; Lisa Freise; Matthew Kybert; Ara Darzi; Ana Luisa Neves; Erik K Mayer Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 7.076