Literature DB >> 31723017

Communicating with patients about breakdowns in care: a national randomised vignette-based survey.

Kimberly A Fisher1,2, Thomas H Gallagher3, Kelly M Smith4, Yanhua Zhou2, Sybil Crawford5,2, Azraa Amroze2, Kathleen M Mazor5,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients are reluctant to speak up about breakdowns in care, resulting in missed opportunities to respond to individual patients and improve the system. Effective approaches to encouraging patients to speak up and responding when they do are needed.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors which influence speaking up, and to examine the impact of apology when problems occur.
DESIGN: Randomised experiment using a vignette-based questionnaire describing 3 care breakdowns (slow response to call bell, rude aide, unanswered questions). The role of the person inquiring about concerns (doctor, nurse, patient care specialist), extent of the prompt (invitation to patient to share concerns) and level of apology were varied.
SETTING: National online survey. PARTICIPANTS: 1188 adults aged ≥35 years were sampled from an online panel representative of the entire US population, created and maintained by GfK, an international survey research organisation; 65.5% response rate. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Affective responses to care breakdowns, intent to speak up, willingness to recommend the hospital.
RESULTS: Twice as many participants receiving an in-depth prompt about care breakdowns would (probably/definitely) recommend the hospital compared with those receiving no prompt (18.4% vs 8.8% respectively (p=0.0067)). Almost three times as many participants receiving a full apology would (probably/definitely) recommend the hospital compared with those receiving no apology (34.1% vs 13.6% respectively ((p<0.0001)). Feeling upset was a strong determinant of greater intent to speak up, but a substantial number of upset participants would not 'definitely' speak up. A more extensive prompt did not result in greater likelihood of speaking up. The inquirer's role influenced speaking up for two of the three breakdowns (rudeness and slow response).
CONCLUSIONS: Asking about possible care breakdowns in detail, and offering a full apology when breakdowns are reported substantially increases patients' willingness to recommend the hospital. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; health services research; healthcare quality improvement; patient satisfaction; patient-centred care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31723017      PMCID: PMC7170008          DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  21 in total

1.  Parents' Perspectives on Navigating the Work of Speaking Up in the NICU.

Authors:  Audrey Lyndon; Kirsten Wisner; Carrie Holschuh; Kelly M Fagan; Linda S Franck
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2017-08-01

2.  Learning From Patients' Experiences Related To Diagnostic Errors Is Essential For Progress In Patient Safety.

Authors:  Traber Davis Giardina; Helen Haskell; Shailaja Menon; Julia Hallisy; Frederick S Southwick; Urmimala Sarkar; Kathryn E Royse; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Apology in medical practice: an emerging clinical skill.

Authors:  Aaron Lazare
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Time to listen: a review of methods to solicit patient reports of adverse events.

Authors:  A King; J Daniels; J Lim; D D Cochrane; A Taylor; J M Ansermino
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-04

5.  Raising up the voices of the closest observers of care.

Authors:  Naomi S Bardach
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  We Want to Know: Eliciting Hospitalized Patients' Perspectives on Breakdowns in Care.

Authors:  Kimberly Fisher; Kelly Smith; Thomas Gallagher; Laura Burns; Crystal Morales; Kathleen Mazor
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 7.  The missing evidence: a systematic review of patients' experiences of adverse events in health care.

Authors:  Reema Harrison; Merrilyn Walton; Elizabeth Manias; Jennifer Smith-Merry; Patrick Kelly; Rick Iedema; Lauren Robinson
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  More than words: patients' views on apology and disclosure when things go wrong in cancer care.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Sarah M Greene; Douglas Roblin; Celeste A Lemay; Cassandra L Firneno; Josephine Calvi; Carolyn D Prouty; Kathryn Horner; Thomas H Gallagher
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-08-06

9.  What do patients and relatives know about problems and failures in care?

Authors:  Rick Iedema; Suellen Allen; Katherine Britton; Thomas H Gallagher
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Authoritarian physicians and patients' fear of being labeled 'difficult' among key obstacles to shared decision making.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch; Suepattra G May; Katharine A S Rendle; Caroline Tietbohl; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  2 in total

1.  Creating a Learning Health System for Improving Diagnostic Safety: Pragmatic Insights from US Health Care Organizations.

Authors:  Traber D Giardina; Umber Shahid; Umair Mushtaq; Divvy K Upadhyay; Abigail Marinez; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Speaking up about patient-perceived serious visit note errors: Patient and family experiences and recommendations.

Authors:  Barbara D Lam; Fabienne Bourgeois; Zhiyong J Dong; Sigall K Bell
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.497

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.