Literature DB >> 33367119

Longitudinal characterization of the tumoral microbiome during radiotherapy in HPV-associated oropharynx cancer.

Houda Bahig1,2, Clifton D Fuller1, Aparna Mitra1, Kyoko Yoshida-Court1, Travis Solley1, Sweet Ping Ng3, Ibrahim Abu-Gheida4, Baher Elgohari1,5, Andrea Delgado1, David I Rosenthal1, Adam S Garden1, Steven J Frank1, Jay P Reddy1, Lauren Colbert1, Ann Klopp1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the baseline and serial tumor microbiome in HPV-associated oropharynx cancer (OPC) over the course of radiotherapy (RT).
METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed HPV-associated OPC treated with definitive radiotherapy +/- concurrent chemotherapy were enrolled in this prospective study. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, dynamic changes in the tumor site microbiome during RT were investigated. Surface tumor samples were obtained before RT and at week 1, 3 and 5 of RT. Radiological primary tumor response at mid-treatment was categorized as complete (CR) or partial (PR).
RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled, but 9 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean age was 62 years (range: 51-71). As per AJCC 8th Ed, 56%, 22% and 22% of patients had stage I, II and III, respectively. At 4-weeks, 6 patients had CR and 3 patients had PR; at follow-up imaging post treatment, all patients had CR. The baseline diversity of the tumoral versus buccal microbiome was not statistically different. For the entire cohort, alpha diversity was significantly decreased over the course of treatment (p = 0.04). There was a significant alteration in the bacterial community within the first week of radiation. Baseline tumor alpha diversity of patients with CR was significantly higher than those with PR (p = 0.03). While patients with CR had significant reduction in diversity over the course of radiation (p = 0.01), the diversity remained unchanged in patients with PR. Patients with history of smoking had significantly increased abundance of  Kingella (0.05) and lower abundance of Stomatobaculum (p = 0.03) compared to never smokers.
CONCLUSIONS: The tumor microbiome of HPV-associated OPC exhibits reduced alpha diversity and altered taxa abundance over the course of radiotherapy. The baseline bacterial profiles of smokers vs. non-smokers were inherently different. Baseline tumor alpha diversity of patients with CR was higher than patients with PR, suggesting that the microbiome deserves further investigation as a biomarker of radiation response.
© 2020 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpha diversity; Biomarker; Human papilloma virus; Oropharynx cancer; Radiotherapy; Response prediction; Tumor microbiome

Year:  2020        PMID: 33367119      PMCID: PMC7749292          DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 2405-6308


Introduction

The last decades have seen the emergence of human papillomavirus (HPV) –associated squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx cancer (OPC), that now constitutes the vast majority of OPC in North America [1], [2]. HPV-associated OPC has a significantly improved prognosis compared to non-HPV-associated OPC [3], [4], and is currently the focus of multiple trials of treatment de-intensification, in an attempt to reduce treatment-related morbidity [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. However, it is now recognized that a subset of HPV-associated OPC presents with highly aggressive behaviour and may not be suited for these treatment de-intensification approaches that may jeopardize patients outcomes [11]. This poor prognosis subgroup remains poorly defined and reliable patient-specific biomarkers that can predict treatment response are greatly needed. Complete response at mid-treatment is observed in as high as 50% of patients with HPV-associated OPC [12], and tumor response to radiotherapy has been shown to be associated with permanent tumor control outcomes [13]. Across multiple cancer sites, cumulating evidence suggests that the microbiome could impact cancer risk and treatment outcomes [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. In a recent study, an increased diversity of the local gut microbiome was found to be associated with a favorable response to chemoradiation in cervical cancer [20]. The oral microbiome hosts several hundred bacterial species and is emerging as a new potential biomarker reservoir for head and neck cancers [21], [22]. Differences in composition between the oral microbiome of patients with oral cavity and oropharynx cancers and that of healthy individuals have led to recent initiatives investigating the potential role of the oral microbiome for early detection of head and neck malignancies [23], [24]. Previous studies have shown that the composition of the oral microbiome was altered over the course of radiotherapy in oral cavity cancer [25], [26]. To our knowledge, there is currently no study characterizing the tumor microbiome in OPC treated with radiotherapy. We hypothesize that the tumor site microbiome will be significantly altered over the course of radiotherapy and that the local microbiome may impact radiation response. The aim of this pilot study is two-fold:[1]1) to describe the baseline and longitudinal changes in tumor microbiome in HPV-associated OPC over the course of radiotherapy (RT); 2) to compare the tumor microbiome of early vs. late radiotherapy responders. In doing so, we hope to generate hypothesis that would lay ground for future larger scale work on the role of the tumor microbiome in predicting treatment response.

Material and methods

Patients

Patients with newly diagnosed HPV-associated squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx treated with radical radiotherapy +/- cisplatin-based chemotherapy and whose tumour could be accessed by surface swab in the clinic were prospectively enrolled at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patients treated with induction chemotherapy or robotic surgery, and patients with previous head and neck malignancy were excluded. Patients were treated with standard of care radiotherapy at a dose of 70 Gy in 33 fractions over 6–7 weeks. This study was approved by our institutional ethics committee (MDACC 2014–0543), and all patients signed a consent form.

Response assessment

All patients underwent pre-treatment planning computed tomography (CT) and, unless contra-indicated, a planning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and neck region. In addition, all patients underwent mid-treatment (week 4) repeat planning CT and MRI for early primary tumor response assessment. Mid-treatment primary tumor response was classified as complete (CR), partial (PR) or stable (SD), based on RECIST criteria version 1.1. A contrast-enhanced CT of the head and neck was obtained at 8 weeks after treatment completion for definitive treatment response assessment. In cases where response at 8 weeks post treatment was incomplete, a fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (PET/CT) was obtained at 12 weeks after RT completion for further assessment of response.

Microbiome sample collection and analysis

Treated tumor site microbiome samples were obtained immediately before RT start and at week 1, 3 and 5 using a matrix designed quick release Isohelix swab (DSK-50 and XME-50, isohelix.com, UK). Samples were obtained by brushing the swab against the viable tumor several times in order to collect enough cells from the tumor surface. For patients presenting complete response at time of sampling, efforts were made to sample the same region of the oropharynx where the tumor initially was. At baseline (i.e. immediately before RT start), an oral microbiome swab was also obtained by brushing the swab against healthy buccal mucosa, to serve as control. Isohelix swabs were placed in 20 μL of protease K and 400 μL of lysis buffer (Isohelix) and stored at − 80 °C within 1 h of sample collection. Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using MO BIO PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories). Microorganism identification derived from culture-based approaches, using the 16 Svedberg unit (S) rRNA gene technology for bacteria. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed by the Alkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research at Baylor College of Medicine. 16S rRNA was sequenced methods previously detailed in the Human Microbiome Project [27]. Sequences were categorized into clusters called “Operational Taxonomic Units” (OTUs) based upon similarity on 16S gene sequences in order to distinguish bacteria. Shannon and Simpson indices were used to evaluate alpha diversity, defined as the variance of distinguishable taxonomic groups within each sample [28], [29]. The relative abundance of the microbiome taxa, defined as the percent composition of bacteria of a particular kind relative to the total number of organisms in the sample, was compared between patients presenting CR vs. PR/SD at mid-treatment. Using the Kruskal-Wallis test, an α of ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Patients characteristics

Ten patients were initially enrolled, but 1 patient who received concurrent immunotherapy was excluded from the final analysis. Mean age was 62 years (range: 51–71) and all patients were male (Table 1). Tumor was located in the tonsil and in the base of tongue in 56% and 44% of patients, respectively. As per AJCC 8th Ed, 56%, 22% and 22% of patients had stage I, II and III, respectively. 33% were smokers (active or past), while 66% never smoked. All patients were treated to a dose of 70 Gy in 33–35 fractions. Seven patients underwent concurrent platin-based chemotherapy that consisted in weekly cisplatin at 40 mg/m2. At 4-weeks, 6 patients had CR and 3 patients had PR. Five of the 6 patients who were never smokers had CR at week 4, while only 1 of the 3 patients with history of smoking had CR at week 4. At 8 weeks post treatment, all patients with CR at mid treatment had persistent CR, while among patients with mid-treatment PR, 1 had CR and 2 had persistent PR at the primary site and/or lymph nodes. All patients had complete response on PET/CT at 12 weeks post-treatment. Five patients were treated with volumetric arc therapy while 4 patients were treated with intensity modulated proton therapy.
Table 1

Patients Characteristics

Age (median, range, y)62 (51–71)
Gender (N)
Male9
Tumor subsite (N)
Tonsil5
Base of tongue4
Stage (AJCC 8th Ed; N)
I5
II2
III2
Smoking status (N)
Smokers (past or active)3
Never smokers6
Treatment (N)
Chemo-RT7
RT alone2
Patients Characteristics

Characterisation of the mucosal microbiome

The baseline alpha diversity of the tumoral vs. buccal microbiome was not statistically different (Fig. 1a). The baseline composition of the bacterial community of the tumoral vs. buccal microbiome was overall similar, with the exccpetion of increased abundance of Veillonella (p = 0.04) and Leptotrichia (p = 0.02) in the tumor microbiome at baseline (Fig. 1b). The baseline alpha diversity of patients who had a CR by 4 weeks was significantly higher than those who had a PR (p = 0.03) (Fig. 2). For the entire cohort, alpha diversity was significantly decreased over the course of treatment (p = 0.04) (Fig. 3a). However, patients with CR at 4-weeks had significantly reduced alpha diversity over the course of radiation (p = 0.01), while diversity remained unchanged in patients with PR (Fig. 3b). Patients with history of smoking had significantly increased abundance of Kingella (0.05) and lower abundance of Stomatobaculum (p = 0.03) compared to never smokers (Fig. 4). There was a shift in the composition of the bacterial community over the course of radiation. The relative composition of Actinomyces (p = 0.01) and Leptotrichia (p = 0.03) declined over the course of radiation. Other organisms, such as Gemella (p = 0.05) and Streptococcus (p = 0.04), decreased in abundance between baseline and week 1 and subsequently returned to baseline abundance by week 5 (Fig. 5). This was followed by progressive re-normalization on subsequent weeks. At week 5, patients with PR had significantly higher abundance of Veillonella (p = 0.04) and Atopoblum (p = 0.04) (Fig. 6).
Fig. 1

Comparison of tumoral versus buccal microbiome: a) Baseline alpha diversity ; b) Baseline microbial composition. OTU= Operational Taxonomic Unit; HN= head and neck tumor site.

Fig. 2

Baseline alpha diversity of patients with CR vs. PR at mid-treatment. CR= complete response; PR= partial response.

Fig. 3

Changes in alpha diversity over the course of treatment for a) the entire cohort and b) for patients with CR vs. PR mid-treatment. CR= complete response; PR= partial response.

Fig. 4

Comparison of the microbial composition of smokers vs. never smokers.

Fig. 5

Dynamic alteration in taxa abundance over the course of radiation. The relative abundance of organisms at the genus level at baseline and throughout the course of radiation are shown.

Fig. 6

Comparison of microbial composition at mid-treatment between patients with CR vs. =PR. CR= complete response; PR= partial response.

Comparison of tumoral versus buccal microbiome: a) Baseline alpha diversity ; b) Baseline microbial composition. OTU= Operational Taxonomic Unit; HN= head and neck tumor site. Baseline alpha diversity of patients with CR vs. PR at mid-treatment. CR= complete response; PR= partial response. Changes in alpha diversity over the course of treatment for a) the entire cohort and b) for patients with CR vs. PR mid-treatment. CR= complete response; PR= partial response. Comparison of the microbial composition of smokers vs. never smokers. Dynamic alteration in taxa abundance over the course of radiation. The relative abundance of organisms at the genus level at baseline and throughout the course of radiation are shown. Comparison of microbial composition at mid-treatment between patients with CR vs. =PR. CR= complete response; PR= partial response.

Discussion

This is the first study characterizing the tumor microbiome in HPV-associated OPC and exploring its role in the prediction of response to radiotherapy. In this pilot study, we report that the alpha diversity was significantly reduced over the course of treatment and that the composition of the microbiota was rapidly altered as early as in the first week of radiation. The baseline alpha diversity of the tumor microbiome was significantly higher in rapid responders (i.e. those with complete response at mid-treatment). This is consistent with recent work by our group demonstrating that increased diversity was associated with favorable response to chemoradiation in cervical cancer [20], [30]. Although this remains hypothesis generating, it is possible that the presence of a more diverse microbiome in rapid responders may result in increased immune activation, either due to increased immune cell infiltration or due to expansion of tumor specific T-cell populations due to cross reactivity between tumor antigens and the microbiome. It is also possible that a tumor with other underlying features of radiosensitivity, such as perhaps well oxygenated, tends to support a more diverse microbiome. Interestingly, we also found that the tumor microbiome profiles of smokers vs. non-smokers were significantly different and that 66% of smokers had persistent disease at 4 weeks of radiation (vs. only 17% of never smokers). This finding is consistent with current knowledge that a history of smoking is associated with adverse cancer outcomes in OPC treated with chemoradiation [31]. The oral microbiome has been hypothesised to play a role in the pathogenesis of head and neck cancers, through chronic inflammation, anti-apoptotic cellular signalling and release of carcinogens [32]. In fact, inherent differences in the bacterial flora of healthy individuals versus individuals with oral cavity/oropharynx cancers have been documented in several studies, and various mechanisms supporting a carcinogenic role of the oral microbiome have been postulated [33], [34], [35], [36], [37]. As an example, acetaldehyde, a toxic ethanol metabolite produced via bacterial oxidation is found in higher concentration in heavy alcohol users with poor oral hygiene and its accumulation has been linked to increased risk of oral cavity cancer [38], [39]. Similarly, a synergistic effect of periodontitis - a chronic infection caused by gram-negative anaerobic bacteria- and oral HPV co-infection has been suggested for the development of OPC cancer, as the continuous release of bacterial toxins and inflammatory markers in the oral cavity would enhance epithelial tissue abrasion, basal cells infection, and ultimately persistence of HPV infection [40]. The role of the oral microbiome to predict the therapeutic efficacy of radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancers has never previously been investigated. Numerous recent studies have focused on the role the gut microbiome as a modulator of the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in several cancers, including melanoma, lung and renal cancer [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. In these studies, an increased alpha diversity of the microbiome was associated with higher therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors [14], [19]. However, in Checkmate 141, a trial investigating the role of Nivolumab in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer, the oral microbiome and its alpha diversity were not predictive of the therapeutic response to immunotherapy [41]. A study at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (NCT034106615) assessing oral and intestinal microbiota in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radical chemoradiotherapy is currently on-going and its results will shed light on the role of the microbiome the predict cancer outcomes after head and neck radiotherapy. The dynamic variation of the oral microbiome over the course of head and neck radiotherapy has not been well studied. Huo et al, correlated the dynamic oral microbiome change with the severity of mucositis in patients treated for nasopharynx cancer and found that, although the bacterial alpha diversity did not vary significantly over treatment, there were synchronous shifts in the abundance of specific bacteria such as Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Treponema and Porphyromonas [26]. Similarly, Zhu et al. showed that the microbiome profile of patients undergoing radiotherapy for nasopharynx cancer was progressively altered during radiation therapy, in close correlation with development of mucositis [25], [26]. Our study reports preliminary outcomes from an on-going initiative assessing the role of the microbiome in HPV-associated cancers. Given the small sample size, the results of this report are strictly hypothesis generating. Further work is required to further understand and determine if the tumor microbiome truly has a role in the prediction of therapeutic efficacy in head and neck cancers. In addition, distinctions between the dynamic alterations of the microbiome of patients treated with radiotherapy alone vs. concurrent chemoradiation could not be effectively studied. We recognize that the heterogeneity in this small cohort has limited the ability to analyze these clinical variables. Another limitation is the lack of concurrent gut microbiome data; however, the role of the gut microbiome may not have the same importance in the context of head and neck radiotherapy as compared to systemic therapy, given that the main anti-tumor mechanisms are local. Finally, an inherent limitation of studies assessing the role of the microbiome is the regional microbiome variations, which may limit the external validity of study findings and warrant local confirmatory investigations. In conclusion, we found that the tumor microbiome of our entire cohort of patients with HPV-associated OPC exhibits reduced alpha diversity over the course of radiation. This was also associated with an altered taxa abundance manifesting as early as in the first week of radiotherapy. Although not definitive, we found that baseline alpha diversity of patients with complete response by mid-treatment was higher than patients with partial responses or stable disease. While the diversity of the tumor microbiome as a biomarker of radiation response in OPC deserves further investigation, these preliminary outcomes are encouraging and lay ground for further work in that direction.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  38 in total

Review 1.  HPV-associated head and neck cancer: a virus-related cancer epidemic.

Authors:  Shanthi Marur; Gypsyamber D'Souza; William H Westra; Arlene A Forastiere
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  K Kian Ang; Jonathan Harris; Richard Wheeler; Randal Weber; David I Rosenthal; Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tân; William H Westra; Christine H Chung; Richard C Jordan; Charles Lu; Harold Kim; Rita Axelrod; C Craig Silverman; Kevin P Redmond; Maura L Gillison
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Perspective on immune oncology with liquid biopsy, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and microbiome with non-invasive biomarkers in cancer patients.

Authors:  A Mitsuhashi; Y Okuma
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Re: Gut Microbiome Influences Efficacy of PD-1-based Immunotherapy Against Epithelial Tumors.

Authors:  Matteo Santoni; Francesco Piva; Alessandro Conti; Angela Santoni; Alessia Cimadamore; Marina Scarpelli; Nicola Battelli; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Significance and therapeutic implications of tumor regression following radiotherapy in patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx and pharyngolarynx.

Authors:  J P Bataini; C Jaulerry; F Brunin; D Ponvert; N A Ghossein
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  De-escalation treatment protocols for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current clinical trials.

Authors:  Liam Masterson; Daniel Moualed; Zi Wei Liu; James E F Howard; Raghav C Dwivedi; James R Tysome; Richard Benson; Jane C Sterling; Holger Sudhoff; Piyush Jani; Peter K C Goon
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Synergistic effect of alcohol drinking and smoking on in vivo acetaldehyde concentration in saliva.

Authors:  Ville Salaspuro; Mikko Salaspuro
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Strategy of Using Intratreatment Hypoxia Imaging to Selectively and Safely Guide Radiation Dose De-escalation Concurrent With Chemotherapy for Locoregionally Advanced Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Nancy Lee; Heiko Schoder; Brad Beattie; Ryan Lanning; Nadeem Riaz; Sean McBride; Nora Katabi; Duan Li; Brett Yarusi; Susie Chan; Lindsey Mitrani; Zhigang Zhang; David G Pfister; Eric Sherman; Shrujal Baxi; Jay Boyle; Luc G T Morris; Ian Ganly; Richard Wong; John Humm
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Targeted Therapy in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Implications of HPV for Therapy.

Authors:  Ashley Hay; Ian Ganly
Journal:  Rare Cancers Ther       Date:  2015-09-09

10.  16S rRNA amplicon sequencing identifies microbiota associated with oral cancer, human papilloma virus infection and surgical treatment.

Authors:  Rafael Guerrero-Preston; Filipa Godoy-Vitorino; Anne Jedlicka; Arnold Rodríguez-Hilario; Herminio González; Jessica Bondy; Fahcina Lawson; Oluwasina Folawiyo; Christina Michailidi; Amanda Dziedzic; Rajagowthamee Thangavel; Tal Hadar; Maartje G Noordhuis; William Westra; Wayne Koch; David Sidransky
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Haemophilus pittmaniae and Leptotrichia spp. Constitute a Multi-Marker Signature in a Cohort of Human Papillomavirus-Positive Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Jean-Luc C Mougeot; Micaela F Beckman; Holden C Langdon; Rajesh V Lalla; Michael T Brennan; Farah K Bahrani Mougeot
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.