Literature DB >> 33363226

Association Between Tail-Biting and Intestinal Microbiota Composition in Pigs.

Nassima Rabhi1,2, Alexandre Thibodeau1,2, Jean-Charles Côté1,2, Nicolas Devillers3, Benoit Laplante4, Philippe Fravalo1,2, Guillaume Larivière-Gauthier1,2, William P Thériault1,2, Luigi Faucitano3, Guy Beauchamp1,2, Sylvain Quessy1,2.   

Abstract

Tail-biting (TB) in pigs is a serious behavioral disorder. It is an important challenge in swine production as it impacts animal welfare and health and the economics and safety of the pork meat supply chain. To prevent TB, approaches including enrichment material and tail docking are proposed but none are optimal. Nutrition appears to be an important factor in TB behavior, perhaps by modulating the intestinal microbiota (IM). Our aim was to assess the association between TB behavior and IM in pigs through comparisons of IM in groups of biter, bitten and non-biter/non-bitten pigs. Each group composed of 12 pigs was formed at the beginning of the growing/finishing phase based on a target behavior analysis centered on TB behavior for the biter group and a score of damages caused to the tail for the bitten group. Blood and fecal samples were collected from each pig during a TB episode, at time 0, t0, and when the TB episode was considered finished, 4 weeks later, at time 1, t1. Serum cortisol level was determined by ELISA and used as an indicator of stress. The pig's fecal microbiota was analyzed from DNA extracted from freshly collected fecal matter using amplicon sequencing of the V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene. Serum cortisol levels were significantly higher in either the biter or bitten pig groups compared to the negative control group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). The microbiota alpha-diversity was not significantly different between all groups, biter, bitten and negative control. Analyses of beta-diversity, however, revealed a significant difference between either the biter or the bitten group in comparison to the non-biter/non-bitten negative control group in terms of structure and composition of the microbiota. Lactobacillus were significantly more abundant in the negative control group compared to the two other groups (p = 0.001). No significant difference was revealed between the biter and bitten groups. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) confirmed that lactobacilli were more abundant in the negative control group. Our study indicates that TB behavior is associated with the IM composition in pigs.
Copyright © 2020 Rabhi, Thibodeau, Côté, Devillers, Laplante, Fravalo, Larivière-Gauthier, Thériault, Faucitano, Beauchamp and Quessy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA gene; behavioral disorder; intestinal microbiota; pig; stress; tail-biting

Year:  2020        PMID: 33363226      PMCID: PMC7756002          DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.563762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Vet Sci        ISSN: 2297-1769


  48 in total

1.  Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites.

Authors:  William R Wikoff; Andrew T Anfora; Jun Liu; Peter G Schultz; Scott A Lesley; Eric C Peters; Gary Siuzdak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform.

Authors:  James J Kozich; Sarah L Westcott; Nielson T Baxter; Sarah K Highlander; Patrick D Schloss
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Health parameters in tail biters and bitten pigs in a case-control study.

Authors:  C Munsterhjelm; O Simola; L Keeling; A Valros; M Heinonen
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Probiotics and Subclinical Psychological Symptoms in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer McKean; Helen Naug; Elham Nikbakht; Bianca Amiet; Natalie Colson
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.579

Review 5.  Injurious tail biting in pigs: how can it be controlled in existing systems without tail docking?

Authors:  R B D'Eath; G Arnott; S P Turner; T Jensen; H P Lahrmann; M E Busch; J K Niemi; A B Lawrence; P Sandøe
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of tail docking and docking length on neuroanatomical changes in healed tail tips of pigs.

Authors:  M S Herskin; K Thodberg; H E Jensen
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Why are most EU pigs tail docked? Economic and ethical analysis of four pig housing and management scenarios in the light of EU legislation and animal welfare outcomes.

Authors:  R B D'Eath; J K Niemi; B Vosough Ahmadi; K M D Rutherford; S H Ison; S P Turner; H T Anker; T Jensen; M E Busch; K K Jensen; A B Lawrence; P Sandøe
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Tail-biting: a new perspective.

Authors:  Nina R Taylor; David C J Main; Mike Mendl; Sandra A Edwards
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2009-10-04       Impact factor: 2.688

9.  The bacterial communities associated with fecal types and body weight of rex rabbits.

Authors:  Bo Zeng; Shushu Han; Ping Wang; Bin Wen; Wensu Jian; Wei Guo; Zhiju Yu; Dan Du; Xiangchao Fu; Fanli Kong; Mingyao Yang; Xiaohui Si; Jiangchao Zhao; Ying Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Save the pig tail.

Authors:  Anna Valros; Mari Heinonen
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2015-04-16
View more
  4 in total

1.  The gut microbiota and microbial metabolites are associated with tail biting in pigs.

Authors:  Else Verbeek; Linda Keeling; Rikard Landberg; Jan Erik Lindberg; Johan Dicksved
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  The Evidence for a Causal Link Between Disease and Damaging Behavior in Pigs.

Authors:  Laura A Boyle; Sandra A Edwards; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Françoise Pol; Manja Zupan Šemrov; Sabine Schütze; Janicke Nordgreen; Nadya Bozakova; Evangelia N Sossidou; Anna Valros
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-27

3.  Early life environment affects behavior, welfare, gut microbiome composition, and diversity in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Ingrid C de Jong; Dirkjan Schokker; Henk Gunnink; Maudia van Wijhe; Johanna M J Rebel
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-12

4.  Decoding the intestinal microbiota repertoire of sow and weaned pigs using culturomic and metagenomic approaches.

Authors:  Daye Mun; Hayoung Kim; Minhye Shin; Sangdon Ryu; Minho Song; Sangnam Oh; Younghoon Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2021-11-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.