Literature DB >> 25130712

Injurious tail biting in pigs: how can it be controlled in existing systems without tail docking?

R B D'Eath1, G Arnott1, S P Turner1, T Jensen2, H P Lahrmann2, M E Busch2, J K Niemi3, A B Lawrence1, P Sandøe4.   

Abstract

Tail biting is a serious animal welfare and economic problem in pig production. Tail docking, which reduces but does not eliminate tail biting, remains widespread. However, in the EU tail docking may not be used routinely, and some 'alternative' forms of pig production and certain countries do not allow tail docking at all. Against this background, using a novel approach focusing on research where tail injuries were quantified, we review the measures that can be used to control tail biting in pigs without tail docking. Using this strict criterion, there was good evidence that manipulable substrates and feeder space affect damaging tail biting. Only epidemiological evidence was available for effects of temperature and season, and the effect of stocking density was unclear. Studies suggest that group size has little effect, and the effects of nutrition, disease and breed require further investigation. The review identifies a number of knowledge gaps and promising avenues for future research into prevention and mitigation. We illustrate the diversity of hypotheses concerning how different proposed risk factors might increase tail biting through their effect on each other or on the proposed underlying processes of tail biting. A quantitative comparison of the efficacy of different methods of provision of manipulable materials, and a review of current practices in countries and assurance schemes where tail docking is banned, both suggest that daily provision of small quantities of destructible, manipulable natural materials can be of considerable benefit. Further comparative research is needed into materials, such as ropes, which are compatible with slatted floors. Also, materials which double as fuel for anaerobic digesters could be utilised. As well as optimising housing and management to reduce risk, it is important to detect and treat tail biting as soon as it occurs. Early warning signs before the first bloody tails appear, such as pigs holding their tails tucked under, could in future be automatically detected using precision livestock farming methods enabling earlier reaction and prevention of tail damage. However, there is a lack of scientific studies on how best to respond to outbreaks: the effectiveness of, for example, removing biters and/or bitten pigs, increasing enrichment, or applying substances to tails should be investigated. Finally, some breeding companies are exploring options for reducing the genetic propensity to tail bite. If these various approaches to reduce tail biting are implemented we propose that the need for tail docking will be reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25130712     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114001359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  35 in total

1.  Effects of tail docking and tail biting on performance and welfare of growing-finishing pigs in a confinement housing system.

Authors:  Y Z Li; H F Zhang; L J Johnston; W Martin; J D Peterson; J F Coetzee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

3.  Maternal and direct genetic parameters for tail length, tail lesions, and growth traits in pigs.

Authors:  Sheila Aikins-Wilson; Mehdi Bohlouli; Sven König
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  VTag: a semi-supervised pipeline for tracking pig activity with a single top-view camera.

Authors:  Chun-Peng J Chen; Gota Morota; Kiho Lee; Zhiwu Zhang; Hao Cheng
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

5.  Study on the Association between Tail Lesion Score, Cold Carcass Weight, and Viscera Condemnations in Slaughter Pigs.

Authors:  Dayane Lemos Teixeira; Sarah Harley; Alison Hanlon; Niamh Elizabeth O'Connell; Simon John More; Edgar Garcia Manzanilla; Laura Ann Boyle
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-03-14

6.  A survey of straw use and tail biting in Swedish pig farms rearing undocked pigs.

Authors:  Torun Wallgren; Rebecka Westin; Stefan Gunnarsson
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 1.695

7.  Exploration Feeding and Higher Space Allocation Improve Welfare of Growing-Finishing Pigs.

Authors:  Herman M Vermeer; Nienke C P M M Dirx-Kuijken; Marc B M Bracke
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Indirect genetic effects for growth rate in domestic pigs alter aggressive and manipulative biting behaviour.

Authors:  Irene Camerlink; Winanda W Ursinus; Piter Bijma; Bas Kemp; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Understanding Tail-Biting in Pigs through Social Network Analysis.

Authors:  Yuzhi Li; Haifeng Zhang; Lee J Johnston; Wayne Martin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Automatic early warning of tail biting in pigs: 3D cameras can detect lowered tail posture before an outbreak.

Authors:  Richard B D'Eath; Mhairi Jack; Agnieszka Futro; Darren Talbot; Qiming Zhu; David Barclay; Emma M Baxter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.