Literature DB >> 33363089

Patient Preferences For Specialty Pharmacy Services: A Stated Preference Discrete-Choice Experiment in China.

Qinyuan Hu1, Haiyao Hu2, Ming Hu1, Yumei Yang1, Zhiang Wu3, Naitong Zhou1.   

Abstract

Objectives: To survey, analyze, and ascertain the preferences for specialty pharmacy services among patients requiring complex care and to provide evidence to support specialty pharmacy service decision-making in China.
Methods: To identify essential service attributes and levels, a review of the literature, discussions with specialty pharmacy managers and a pilot questionnaire were conducted. A D-efficient fractional factorial design was used to generate the discrete-choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire. A face-to-face survey of patients with chronic illness and their families or friends was conducted at three specialty pharmacies in Chengdu and Qingdao, China. A mixed logit model was used for estimation.
Results: Six relevant attributes were identified and incorporated into the DCE questionnaire. A total of 417 participants completed the survey (mean age 43 years, 45.1% males), and 32.1% had lung cancer. The conditional relative importance showed that the most critical attribute was "frequency of telephone follow-up to monitor adverse drug reactions (ADRs), "followed by "mode of drug delivery," "provider of medication guidance services," and "availability of medical insurance consultation"; the least important attribute was "business hours." A 1 min increase in time spent led to a 0.73% decrease in the probability that a service profile would be chosen. Negative preferences were noted for ADR monitoring by telephone follow-up once a year (β = -0.23, p < 0.001) and business hours [8:30-20:00 (Monday to Friday), 8:30-17:30 (weekend)] (β = -0.12, p < 0.001). Compared with women, men had a higher preference for service monitoring ADRs once every 3 months. Conclusions: Preference measurements showed that "frequency of telephone follow-up to monitor ADRs" had the most critical impact on decisions, followed by "mode of drug delivery." Specialty pharmacies in China need to take these findings into account to improve their design to increase uptake and patient loyalty.
Copyright © 2020 Hu, Hu, Hu, Yang, Wu and Zhou.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCE; conjoint analysis (CA); patient preference; pharmacy service; specialty pharmacy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33363089      PMCID: PMC7755860          DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.597389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Public Health        ISSN: 2296-2565


  25 in total

1.  Using stated preference discrete choice modelling to evaluate the introduction of varicella vaccination.

Authors:  Jane Hall; Patricia Kenny; Madeleine King; Jordan Louviere; Rosalie Viney; Angela Yeoh
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?

Authors:  Emily Lancsar; Jordan Louviere
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Conducting a Discrete-Choice Experiment Study Following Recommendations for Good Research Practices: An Application for Eliciting Patient Preferences for Diabetes Treatments.

Authors:  Ellen M Janssen; A Brett Hauber; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; A Brett Hauber; Deborah Marshall; Andrew Lloyd; Lisa A Prosser; Dean A Regier; F Reed Johnson; Josephine Mauskopf
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.

Authors:  A Brett Hauber; Juan Marcos González; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Thomas Prior; Deborah A Marshall; Charles Cunningham; Maarten J IJzerman; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Patient preferences for healthcare delivery through community pharmacy settings in the USA: A discrete choice study.

Authors:  M Feehan; M Walsh; J Godin; D Sundwall; M A Munger
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Patients' value of asthma services in Australian pharmacies: the way ahead for asthma care.

Authors:  Pradnya Naik-Panvelkar; Carol Armour; John Rose; Bandana Saini
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 2.515

8.  Patient Preferences for Endometriosis Pain Treatments in the United States.

Authors:  Christine Poulos; Ahmed M Soliman; Cheryl L Renz; Joshua Posner; Sanjay K Agarwal
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.

Authors:  F Reed Johnson; Emily Lancsar; Deborah Marshall; Vikram Kilambi; Axel Mühlbacher; Dean A Regier; Brian W Bresnahan; Barbara Kanninen; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

10.  Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Vikas Soekhai; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Alan R Ellis; Caroline M Vass
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.