Literature DB >> 22348432

Patients' value of asthma services in Australian pharmacies: the way ahead for asthma care.

Pradnya Naik-Panvelkar1, Carol Armour, John Rose, Bandana Saini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Long-term sustainability of health services requires an understanding of patients' values and preferences. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' preferences as well as their willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a community pharmacy-delivered specialized asthma service using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).
METHODS: Patients with asthma in New South Wales, Australia, who had recently experienced a specialized asthma management service at their pharmacy were mailed DCE questionnaires. Patients were asked to choose between two hypothetical service models with varying attributes. Multinomial logit models estimated patients' marginal WTP.
RESULTS: The study had a response rate of 47%. Patients greatly valued various aspects of the pharmacy-based specialized service and had marginal WTP values of AUD$18.00 for a private area, AUD$44.50 for lung function testing, AUD$9.18 for appointments with pharmacists, and AUD$22.80 for provision of comprehensive advice on asthma and its medications. The marginal WTP for the overall service was AUD$94.86.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study indicate that patients greatly value and are willing to pay for asthma services in pharmacies. The study results will help pharmacists and policy advisors in the development of individualized asthma services that patients will use, are willing to pay for, and thus are economically viable in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22348432     DOI: 10.3109/02770903.2012.658130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Asthma        ISSN: 0277-0903            Impact factor:   2.515


  8 in total

Review 1.  Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline Vass; Ewan Gray; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-06

Review 2.  Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Marion Haas; Jane Hall; Rosalie Viney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Jordan J Louviere; David A Chambers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 5.  The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments.

Authors:  Caroline Vass; Dan Rigby; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 6.  Patient Preferences For Specialty Pharmacy Services: A Stated Preference Discrete-Choice Experiment in China.

Authors:  Qinyuan Hu; Haiyao Hu; Ming Hu; Yumei Yang; Zhiang Wu; Naitong Zhou
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-12-09

Review 7.  Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Alison Pearce; Mark Harrison; Verity Watson; Deborah J Street; Kirsten Howard; Nick Bansback; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Hannah Collacott; Dian Zhang; Sebastian Heidenreich; Tommi Tervonen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.883

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.