Natalie Berry1, Matthew Machin2, John Ainsworth2, Katherine Berry1,3, Dawn Edge1, Gillian Haddock1,3, Shon Lewis1, Rohan Morris1, Sandra Bucci1,3. 1. Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. 2. Division of Informatics Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. 3. Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Background: Actissist is a smartphone app designed to deliver an intervention grounded in cognitive behavior therapy for early psychosis. Actissist was developed by a multidisciplinary team of academics, clinicians, experts by experience and software engineers. Actissist has been tested in two trials, the first a proof-of-concept trial where Actissist was safe, acceptable and feasible, the second, a powered randomized controlled trial. Objective: This article describes how our multidisciplinary team designed and developed Actissist. This article describes: (i) how Actissist was informed by initial qualitative interviews and focus groups and an expert reference group; (ii) refinements made to the app based on ongoing user feedback; (iii) successes and challenges encountered; and (iv) learning points and recommendations for involving stakeholders in digital health interventions. Methods: Expert reference group meetings informed the development of Actissist and design of subsequent trials, which included individuals with lived experience of psychosis, clinicians, academics, computer scientists and software engineers. Person-centered stakeholder involvement was promoted using focus groups and qualitative interviews prior to the development of the app, which informed version one of Actissist. Interviews were carried out with participants who had used Actissist. Two further versions of Actissist were developed following additional rounds of testing. Results: Multidisciplinary working throughout the Actissist project led to the development, inclusion and improvement of the app design and content. These changes and features included non-directive and compassionate content, co-designed recovery videos, relaxation exercises, psychoeducation material, ability to "favorite" areas of the app that users found helpful, and goal-setting. Challenges to collaborative working included discrepancies between what stakeholders want and what is technically possible to deliver, resource pressures, trying to deliver desired features within the boundaries of fundamental trial design considerations, and power imbalances associated with multidisciplinary working. Conclusions: The involvement of stakeholders in the design and development and delivery of Actissist has been fundamental to our development approach. Through this collaborative process, we have identified different perspectives and ideas that would have not been generated by the research team alone. Clinical Trial Registrations: Proof-of-concept trial: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN34966555 Fully-powered randomized controlled trial: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN76986679.
Background: Actissist is a smartphone app designed to deliver an intervention grounded in cognitive behavior therapy for early psychosis. Actissist was developed by a multidisciplinary team of academics, clinicians, experts by experience and software engineers. Actissist has been tested in two trials, the first a proof-of-concept trial where Actissist was safe, acceptable and feasible, the second, a powered randomized controlled trial. Objective: This article describes how our multidisciplinary team designed and developed Actissist. This article describes: (i) how Actissist was informed by initial qualitative interviews and focus groups and an expert reference group; (ii) refinements made to the app based on ongoing user feedback; (iii) successes and challenges encountered; and (iv) learning points and recommendations for involving stakeholders in digital health interventions. Methods: Expert reference group meetings informed the development of Actissist and design of subsequent trials, which included individuals with lived experience of psychosis, clinicians, academics, computer scientists and software engineers. Person-centered stakeholder involvement was promoted using focus groups and qualitative interviews prior to the development of the app, which informed version one of Actissist. Interviews were carried out with participants who had used Actissist. Two further versions of Actissist were developed following additional rounds of testing. Results: Multidisciplinary working throughout the Actissist project led to the development, inclusion and improvement of the app design and content. These changes and features included non-directive and compassionate content, co-designed recovery videos, relaxation exercises, psychoeducation material, ability to "favorite" areas of the app that users found helpful, and goal-setting. Challenges to collaborative working included discrepancies between what stakeholders want and what is technically possible to deliver, resource pressures, trying to deliver desired features within the boundaries of fundamental trial design considerations, and power imbalances associated with multidisciplinary working. Conclusions: The involvement of stakeholders in the design and development and delivery of Actissist has been fundamental to our development approach. Through this collaborative process, we have identified different perspectives and ideas that would have not been generated by the research team alone. Clinical Trial Registrations: Proof-of-concept trial: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN34966555 Fully-powered randomized controlled trial: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN76986679.
Authors: Amy Hardy; Anna Wojdecka; Jonathan West; Ed Matthews; Christopher Golby; Thomas Ward; Natalie D Lopez; Daniel Freeman; Helen Waller; Elizabeth Kuipers; Paul Bebbington; David Fowler; Richard Emsley; Graham Dunn; Philippa Garety Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2018-12-05
Authors: Lindsay H Dewa; Mary Lavelle; Katy Pickles; Caroline Kalorkoti; Jack Jaques; Sofia Pappa; Paul Aylin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John Torous; Sandra Bucci; Imogen H Bell; Lars V Kessing; Maria Faurholt-Jepsen; Pauline Whelan; Andre F Carvalho; Matcheri Keshavan; Jake Linardon; Joseph Firth Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2021-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Elena Rodriguez-Villa; Abhijit R Rozatkar; Mohit Kumar; Vikram Patel; Ameya Bondre; Shalini S Naik; Siddharth Dutt; Urvakhsh M Mehta; Srilakshmi Nagendra; Deepak Tugnawat; Ritu Shrivastava; Harikeerthan Raghuram; Azaz Khan; John A Naslund; Snehil Gupta; Anant Bhan; Jagadisha Thirthall; Prabhat K Chand; Tanvi Lakhtakia; Matcheri Keshavan; John Torous Journal: Glob Ment Health (Camb) Date: 2021-08-24