Literature DB >> 33362612

Developing a Theory-Informed Smartphone App for Early Psychosis: Learning Points From a Multidisciplinary Collaboration.

Natalie Berry1, Matthew Machin2, John Ainsworth2, Katherine Berry1,3, Dawn Edge1, Gillian Haddock1,3, Shon Lewis1, Rohan Morris1, Sandra Bucci1,3.   

Abstract

Background: Actissist is a smartphone app designed to deliver an intervention grounded in cognitive behavior therapy for early psychosis. Actissist was developed by a multidisciplinary team of academics, clinicians, experts by experience and software engineers. Actissist has been tested in two trials, the first a proof-of-concept trial where Actissist was safe, acceptable and feasible, the second, a powered randomized controlled trial. Objective: This article describes how our multidisciplinary team designed and developed Actissist. This article describes: (i) how Actissist was informed by initial qualitative interviews and focus groups and an expert reference group; (ii) refinements made to the app based on ongoing user feedback; (iii) successes and challenges encountered; and (iv) learning points and recommendations for involving stakeholders in digital health interventions.
Methods: Expert reference group meetings informed the development of Actissist and design of subsequent trials, which included individuals with lived experience of psychosis, clinicians, academics, computer scientists and software engineers. Person-centered stakeholder involvement was promoted using focus groups and qualitative interviews prior to the development of the app, which informed version one of Actissist. Interviews were carried out with participants who had used Actissist. Two further versions of Actissist were developed following additional rounds of testing.
Results: Multidisciplinary working throughout the Actissist project led to the development, inclusion and improvement of the app design and content. These changes and features included non-directive and compassionate content, co-designed recovery videos, relaxation exercises, psychoeducation material, ability to "favorite" areas of the app that users found helpful, and goal-setting. Challenges to collaborative working included discrepancies between what stakeholders want and what is technically possible to deliver, resource pressures, trying to deliver desired features within the boundaries of fundamental trial design considerations, and power imbalances associated with multidisciplinary working. Conclusions: The involvement of stakeholders in the design and development and delivery of Actissist has been fundamental to our development approach. Through this collaborative process, we have identified different perspectives and ideas that would have not been generated by the research team alone. Clinical Trial Registrations: Proof-of-concept trial: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN34966555 Fully-powered randomized controlled trial: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN76986679.
Copyright © 2020 Berry, Machin, Ainsworth, Berry, Edge, Haddock, Lewis, Morris and Bucci.

Entities:  

Keywords:  co-design and co-production; cognitive behavior therapy (CBT); psychosis; public and patient involvement (PPI); smartphone

Year:  2020        PMID: 33362612      PMCID: PMC7758439          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.602861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychiatry        ISSN: 1664-0640            Impact factor:   4.157


  39 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice.

Authors:  Laura Esmail; Emily Moore; Alison Rein
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.744

Review 2.  The digital revolution and its impact on mental health care.

Authors:  Sandra Bucci; Matthias Schwannauer; Natalie Berry
Journal:  Psychol Psychother       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.915

3.  An investigation of the implementation of NICE-recommended CBT interventions for people with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Gillian Haddock; Emily Eisner; Candice Boone; Gabriel Davies; Catherine Coogan; Christine Barrowclough
Journal:  J Ment Health       Date:  2014-01-16

Review 4.  A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Ethnic minority inequalities in access to treatments for schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders: findings from a nationally representative cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jayati Das-Munshi; Dinesh Bhugra; Mike J Crawford
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 6.  Best practice framework for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in collaborative data analysis of qualitative mental health research: methodology development and refinement.

Authors:  Helen Jennings; Mike Slade; Peter Bates; Emma Munday; Rebecca Toney
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  How Inclusive, User-Centered Design Research Can Improve Psychological Therapies for Psychosis: Development of SlowMo.

Authors:  Amy Hardy; Anna Wojdecka; Jonathan West; Ed Matthews; Christopher Golby; Thomas Ward; Natalie D Lopez; Daniel Freeman; Helen Waller; Elizabeth Kuipers; Paul Bebbington; David Fowler; Richard Emsley; Graham Dunn; Philippa Garety
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2018-12-05

8.  Young adults' perceptions of using wearables, social media and other technologies to detect worsening mental health: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Lindsay H Dewa; Mary Lavelle; Katy Pickles; Caroline Kalorkoti; Jack Jaques; Sofia Pappa; Paul Aylin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Over promised, over-sold and underperforming? - e-health in mental health.

Authors:  Til Wykes; Mark Brown
Journal:  J Ment Health       Date:  2016-01-06

10.  A qualitative exploration of service user views about using digital health interventions for self-management in severe mental health problems.

Authors:  Natalie Berry; Fiona Lobban; Sandra Bucci
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 3.630

View more
  3 in total

1.  The temporal relationships between defeat, entrapment and suicidal ideation: ecological momentary assessment study.

Authors:  Wouter van Ballegooijen; Donna L Littlewood; Emma Nielsen; Nav Kapur; Patricia Gooding
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2022-06-03

2.  The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality.

Authors:  John Torous; Sandra Bucci; Imogen H Bell; Lars V Kessing; Maria Faurholt-Jepsen; Pauline Whelan; Andre F Carvalho; Matcheri Keshavan; Jake Linardon; Joseph Firth
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Cross cultural and global uses of a digital mental health app: results of focus groups with clinicians, patients and family members in India and the United States.

Authors:  Elena Rodriguez-Villa; Abhijit R Rozatkar; Mohit Kumar; Vikram Patel; Ameya Bondre; Shalini S Naik; Siddharth Dutt; Urvakhsh M Mehta; Srilakshmi Nagendra; Deepak Tugnawat; Ritu Shrivastava; Harikeerthan Raghuram; Azaz Khan; John A Naslund; Snehil Gupta; Anant Bhan; Jagadisha Thirthall; Prabhat K Chand; Tanvi Lakhtakia; Matcheri Keshavan; John Torous
Journal:  Glob Ment Health (Camb)       Date:  2021-08-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.