Baobao Zhang1, Sarah Kreps1, Nina McMurry2, R Miles McCain3. 1. Department of Government, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America. 2. Institutions and Political Inequality Unit, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin, Germany. 3. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the U.S. public's attitudes toward surveillance measures aimed at curbing the spread of COVID-19, particularly smartphone applications (apps) that supplement traditional contact tracing. METHOD: We deployed a survey of approximately 2,000 American adults to measure support for nine COVID-19 surveillance measures. We assessed attitudes toward contact tracing apps by manipulating six different attributes of a hypothetical app through a conjoint analysis experiment. RESULTS: A smaller percentage of respondents support the government encouraging everyone to download and use contact tracing apps (42%) compared with other surveillance measures such as enforcing temperature checks (62%), expanding traditional contact tracing (57%), carrying out centralized quarantine (49%), deploying electronic device monitoring (44%), or implementing immunity passes (44%). Despite partisan differences on a range of surveillance measures, support for the government encouraging digital contact tracing is indistinguishable between Democrats (47%) and Republicans (46%), although more Republicans oppose the policy (39%) compared to Democrats (27%). Of the app features we tested in our conjoint analysis experiment, only one had statistically significant effects on the self-reported likelihood of downloading the app: decentralized data architecture increased the likelihood by 5.4 percentage points. CONCLUSION: Support for public health surveillance policies to curb the spread of COVID-19 is relatively low in the U.S. Contact tracing apps that use decentralized data storage, compared with those that use centralized data storage, are more accepted by the public. While respondents' support for expanding traditional contact tracing is greater than their support for the government encouraging the public to download and use contact tracing apps, there are smaller partisan differences in support for the latter policy.
OBJECTIVE: To study the U.S. public's attitudes toward surveillance measures aimed at curbing the spread of COVID-19, particularly smartphone applications (apps) that supplement traditional contact tracing. METHOD: We deployed a survey of approximately 2,000 American adults to measure support for nine COVID-19 surveillance measures. We assessed attitudes toward contact tracing apps by manipulating six different attributes of a hypothetical app through a conjoint analysis experiment. RESULTS: A smaller percentage of respondents support the government encouraging everyone to download and use contact tracing apps (42%) compared with other surveillance measures such as enforcing temperature checks (62%), expanding traditional contact tracing (57%), carrying out centralized quarantine (49%), deploying electronic device monitoring (44%), or implementing immunity passes (44%). Despite partisan differences on a range of surveillance measures, support for the government encouraging digital contact tracing is indistinguishable between Democrats (47%) and Republicans (46%), although more Republicans oppose the policy (39%) compared to Democrats (27%). Of the app features we tested in our conjoint analysis experiment, only one had statistically significant effects on the self-reported likelihood of downloading the app: decentralized data architecture increased the likelihood by 5.4 percentage points. CONCLUSION: Support for public health surveillance policies to curb the spread of COVID-19 is relatively low in the U.S. Contact tracing apps that use decentralized data storage, compared with those that use centralized data storage, are more accepted by the public. While respondents' support for expanding traditional contact tracing is greater than their support for the government encouraging the public to download and use contact tracing apps, there are smaller partisan differences in support for the latter policy.
Authors: Golden Gao; Raynell Lang; Robert J Oxoby; Mehdi Mourali; Hasan Sheikh; Madison M Fullerton; Theresa Tang; Braden J Manns; Deborah A Marshall; Jia Hu; Jamie L Benham Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Muhammad Ajmal Azad; Junaid Arshad; Syed Muhammad Ali Akmal; Farhan Riaz; Sidrah Abdullah; Muhammad Imran; Farhan Ahmad Journal: IEEE Internet Things J Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 10.238
Authors: James O'Connell; Manzar Abbas; Sarah Beecham; Jim Buckley; Muslim Chochlov; Brian Fitzgerald; Liam Glynn; Kevin Johnson; John Laffey; Bairbre McNicholas; Bashar Nuseibeh; Michael O'Callaghan; Ian O'Keeffe; Abdul Razzaq; Kaavya Rekanar; Ita Richardson; Andrew Simpkin; Cristiano Storni; Damyanka Tsvyatkova; Jane Walsh; Thomas Welsh; Derek O'Keeffe Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Olivia H Tousignant; Sarah W Hopkins; Abigail M Stark; Gary D Fireman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Laszlo Horvath; Susan Banducci; Joshua Blamire; Cathrine Degnen; Oliver James; Andrew Jones; Daniel Stevens; Katharine Tyler Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-01-17 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Deborah Martínez; Cristina Parilli; Ana María Rojas; Carlos Scartascini; Alberto Simpser Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 3.240